Alkermes Plc (ALKS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Alkermes Plc (ALKS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.07x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-165.74 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.51 Billion) in one year. Explore Alkermes Plc strategic investment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Alkermes Plc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Alkermes Plc across 35 annual periods. Also explore how large is Alkermes Plc's balance sheet for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Alkermes Plc (1991–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Alkermes Plc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Alkermes Plc stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.73x | $520.75 Million | $710.96 Million | ▼ -1.5% |
| 2024 | 0.74x | $439.12 Million | $590.59 Million | ▲ +72.9% |
| 2023 | 0.43x | $401.35 Million | $933.54 Million | ▲ +1780.0% |
| 2022 | 0.02x | $21.04 Million | $920.23 Million | ▼ -79.5% |
| 2021 | 0.11x | $101.72 Million | $911.90 Million | ▲ +18.9% |
| 2020 | 0.09x | $82.84 Million | $882.75 Million | ▼ -6.3% |
| 2019 | 0.10x | $72.08 Million | $719.96 Million | ▼ -34.1% |
| 2018 | 0.15x | $99.28 Million | $653.72 Million | ▲ +370.4% |
| 2017 | 0.03x | $19.19 Million | $594.42 Million | ▲ +126.2% |
| 2016 | -0.12x | $-63.80 Million | $516.94 Million | ▼ -65.6% |
| 2015 | -0.07x | $-40.36 Million | $541.47 Million | ▼ -450.9% |
| 2014 | 0.02x | $11.14 Million | $524.43 Million | ▼ -88.2% |
| 2013 | 0.18x | $92.20 Million | $512.40 Million | ▼ -26.4% |
| 2012 | 0.24x | $126.55 Million | $517.92 Million | ▲ +5823.4% |
| 2011 | 0.00x | $-2.48 Million | $581.37 Million | ▲ +95.6% |
| 2010 | -0.10x | $-5.91 Million | $60.43 Million | ▲ +17.8% |
| 2009 | -0.12x | $-12.25 Million | $102.98 Million | ▼ -134.6% |
| 2008 | 0.34x | $34.59 Million | $100.67 Million | ▲ +184.3% |
| 2007 | 0.12x | $42.42 Million | $351.00 Million | ▼ -50.1% |
| 2006 | 0.24x | $83.73 Million | $345.84 Million | ▼ -22.9% |
| 2005 | 0.31x | $116.53 Million | $371.14 Million | ▲ +241.6% |
| 2004 | -0.22x | $-74.25 Million | $334.76 Million | ▲ +58.7% |
| 2003 | -0.54x | $-98.25 Million | $182.97 Million | ▼ -117.9% |
| 2002 | -0.25x | $-48.75 Million | $197.85 Million | ▼ -34.4% |
| 2001 | -0.18x | $-42.68 Million | $232.78 Million | ▼ -170.3% |
| 2000 | -0.07x | $-17.99 Million | $265.18 Million | ▲ +50.2% |
| 1999 | -0.14x | $-33.03 Million | $242.25 Million | ▲ +52.0% |
| 1998 | -0.28x | $-14.25 Million | $50.20 Million | ▼ -1244.3% |
| 1997 | -0.02x | $-1.14 Million | $53.83 Million | ▲ +96.9% |
| 1996 | -0.67x | $-17.18 Million | $25.55 Million | ▼ -194.9% |
| 1995 | -0.23x | $-5.50 Million | $24.12 Million | ▲ +61.2% |
| 1994 | -0.59x | $-9.10 Million | $15.50 Million | ▲ +31.3% |
| 1993 | -0.85x | $-12.30 Million | $14.40 Million | ▲ +10.3% |
| 1992 | -0.95x | $-6.00 Million | $6.30 Million | ▲ +96.8% |
| 1991 | -30.13x | $-45.20 Million | $1.50 Million | — |