Alkermes Plc (ALKS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Alkermes Plc (ALKS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.06x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $145.18 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.58 Billion) in one year. See Alkermes Plc leverage flexibility ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Alkermes Plc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Alkermes Plc across 35 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Alkermes Plc operating cash flow efficiency.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Alkermes Plc (1991–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Alkermes Plc. Check Alkermes Plc cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.73x | $520.75 Million | $710.96 Million | ▼ -1.5% |
| 2024 | 0.74x | $439.12 Million | $590.59 Million | ▲ +72.9% |
| 2023 | 0.43x | $401.35 Million | $933.54 Million | ▲ +1780.0% |
| 2022 | 0.02x | $21.04 Million | $920.23 Million | ▼ -79.5% |
| 2021 | 0.11x | $101.72 Million | $911.90 Million | ▲ +18.9% |
| 2020 | 0.09x | $82.84 Million | $882.75 Million | ▼ -6.3% |
| 2019 | 0.10x | $72.08 Million | $719.96 Million | ▼ -34.1% |
| 2018 | 0.15x | $99.28 Million | $653.72 Million | ▲ +370.4% |
| 2017 | 0.03x | $19.19 Million | $594.42 Million | ▲ +126.2% |
| 2016 | -0.12x | $-63.80 Million | $516.94 Million | ▼ -65.6% |
| 2015 | -0.07x | $-40.36 Million | $541.47 Million | ▼ -450.9% |
| 2014 | 0.02x | $11.14 Million | $524.43 Million | ▼ -88.2% |
| 2013 | 0.18x | $92.20 Million | $512.40 Million | ▼ -26.4% |
| 2012 | 0.24x | $126.55 Million | $517.92 Million | ▲ +5823.4% |
| 2011 | 0.00x | $-2.48 Million | $581.37 Million | ▲ +95.6% |
| 2010 | -0.10x | $-5.91 Million | $60.43 Million | ▲ +17.8% |
| 2009 | -0.12x | $-12.25 Million | $102.98 Million | ▼ -134.6% |
| 2008 | 0.34x | $34.59 Million | $100.67 Million | ▲ +184.3% |
| 2007 | 0.12x | $42.42 Million | $351.00 Million | ▼ -50.1% |
| 2006 | 0.24x | $83.73 Million | $345.84 Million | ▼ -22.9% |
| 2005 | 0.31x | $116.53 Million | $371.14 Million | ▲ +241.6% |
| 2004 | -0.22x | $-74.25 Million | $334.76 Million | ▲ +58.7% |
| 2003 | -0.54x | $-98.25 Million | $182.97 Million | ▼ -117.9% |
| 2002 | -0.25x | $-48.75 Million | $197.85 Million | ▼ -34.4% |
| 2001 | -0.18x | $-42.68 Million | $232.78 Million | ▼ -170.3% |
| 2000 | -0.07x | $-17.99 Million | $265.18 Million | ▲ +50.2% |
| 1999 | -0.14x | $-33.03 Million | $242.25 Million | ▲ +52.0% |
| 1998 | -0.28x | $-14.25 Million | $50.20 Million | ▼ -1244.3% |
| 1997 | -0.02x | $-1.14 Million | $53.83 Million | ▲ +96.9% |
| 1996 | -0.67x | $-17.18 Million | $25.55 Million | ▼ -194.9% |
| 1995 | -0.23x | $-5.50 Million | $24.12 Million | ▲ +61.2% |
| 1994 | -0.59x | $-9.10 Million | $15.50 Million | ▲ +31.3% |
| 1993 | -0.85x | $-12.30 Million | $14.40 Million | ▲ +10.3% |
| 1992 | -0.95x | $-6.00 Million | $6.30 Million | ▲ +96.8% |
| 1991 | -30.13x | $-45.20 Million | $1.50 Million | — |