Allient Inc. (ALNT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Allient Inc. (ALNT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $6.17 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($271.74 Million) in one year. See Allient Inc. free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Allient Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1988–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Allient Inc. across 36 annual periods. Also explore Allient Inc. net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Allient Inc. (1988–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Allient Inc.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see ALNT market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.21x | $56.67 Million | $276.14 Million | ▲ +52.5% |
| 2024 | 0.13x | $41.85 Million | $310.93 Million | ▲ +3.4% |
| 2023 | 0.13x | $45.04 Million | $345.97 Million | ▲ +767.4% |
| 2022 | 0.02x | $5.60 Million | $372.88 Million | ▼ -83.3% |
| 2021 | 0.09x | $25.40 Million | $283.02 Million | ▼ -25.5% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | $24.84 Million | $206.14 Million | ▼ -34.9% |
| 2019 | 0.19x | $34.53 Million | $186.63 Million | ▲ +94.5% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | $17.45 Million | $183.49 Million | ▼ -62.3% |
| 2017 | 0.25x | $25.41 Million | $100.58 Million | ▲ +90.1% |
| 2016 | 0.13x | $14.30 Million | $107.63 Million | ▼ -35.4% |
| 2015 | 0.21x | $20.07 Million | $97.55 Million | ▲ +11.2% |
| 2014 | 0.19x | $20.30 Million | $109.69 Million | ▲ +111.1% |
| 2013 | 0.09x | $10.78 Million | $122.97 Million | ▼ -64.2% |
| 2012 | 0.24x | $4.60 Million | $18.82 Million | ▼ -38.4% |
| 2011 | 0.40x | $8.88 Million | $22.36 Million | ▲ +16.7% |
| 2010 | 0.34x | $7.17 Million | $21.06 Million | ▲ +17.5% |
| 2009 | 0.29x | $2.82 Million | $9.73 Million | ▼ -30.5% |
| 2008 | 0.42x | $6.64 Million | $15.92 Million | ▲ +24.7% |
| 2007 | 0.33x | $5.86 Million | $17.51 Million | ▲ +121.8% |
| 2006 | 0.15x | $3.63 Million | $24.10 Million | ▲ +13.1% |
| 2005 | 0.13x | $3.67 Million | $27.53 Million | ▲ +24.1% |
| 2004 | 0.11x | $3.27 Million | $30.46 Million | ▼ -42.9% |
| 2003 | 0.19x | $2.15 Million | $11.44 Million | ▲ +355.7% |
| 2002 | 0.04x | $552.00K | $13.37 Million | ▼ -48.8% |
| 2001 | 0.08x | $720.00K | $8.92 Million | ▼ -9.5% |
| 2000 | 0.09x | $678.00K | $7.60 Million | ▲ +653.1% |
| 1999 | -0.02x | $-100.00K | $6.20 Million | ▼ -107.2% |
| 1998 | 0.22x | $1.50 Million | $6.70 Million | ▲ +883.6% |
| 1997 | -0.03x | $-200.00K | $7.00 Million | ▲ +2.9% |
| 1996 | -0.03x | $-200.00K | $6.80 Million | ▼ -115.5% |
| 1995 | 0.19x | $1.40 Million | $7.40 Million | ▼ -29.7% |
| 1993 | 0.27x | $2.10 Million | $7.80 Million | ▲ +13.4% |
| 1992 | 0.24x | $3.80 Million | $16.00 Million | ▲ +104.1% |
| 1991 | 0.12x | $2.70 Million | $23.20 Million | ▼ -45.5% |
| 1989 | 0.21x | $4.70 Million | $22.00 Million | ▼ -7.7% |
| 1988 | 0.23x | $5.30 Million | $22.90 Million | — |