American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $9.29 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($184.03 Million) in one year. Explore AMSC strategic capital deployment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
American Superconductor Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2026)
Historical debt coverage capacity for American Superconductor Corporation across 35 annual periods. Also explore American Superconductor Corporation balance sheet assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for American Superconductor Corporation (1992–2026)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for American Superconductor Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.12x | $23.15 Million | $196.76 Million | ▼ -52.8% |
| 2025 | 0.25x | $28.29 Million | $113.41 Million | ▲ +928.9% |
| 2024 | 0.02x | $2.14 Million | $88.20 Million | ▲ +110.1% |
| 2023 | -0.24x | $-22.48 Million | $93.76 Million | ▲ +18.5% |
| 2022 | -0.29x | $-18.98 Million | $64.50 Million | ▼ -77.2% |
| 2021 | -0.17x | $-8.68 Million | $52.27 Million | ▲ +47.8% |
| 2020 | -0.32x | $-16.50 Million | $51.89 Million | ▼ -128.4% |
| 2019 | 1.12x | $42.71 Million | $38.14 Million | ▲ +262.2% |
| 2018 | -0.69x | $-24.83 Million | $35.95 Million | ▼ -146.5% |
| 2017 | -0.28x | $-11.21 Million | $40.02 Million | ▼ -218.2% |
| 2016 | -0.09x | $-4.56 Million | $51.77 Million | ▲ +85.5% |
| 2015 | -0.61x | $-32.68 Million | $53.93 Million | ▼ -156.9% |
| 2014 | -0.24x | $-13.27 Million | $56.25 Million | ▲ +52.3% |
| 2013 | -0.49x | $-45.27 Million | $91.64 Million | ▲ +68.4% |
| 2012 | -1.56x | $-141.04 Million | $90.18 Million | ▼ -916.8% |
| 2011 | -0.15x | $-22.82 Million | $148.35 Million | ▼ -145.1% |
| 2010 | 0.34x | $40.68 Million | $119.22 Million | ▲ +1327.1% |
| 2009 | -0.03x | $-2.43 Million | $87.25 Million | ▲ +91.8% |
| 2008 | -0.34x | $-17.82 Million | $52.78 Million | ▲ +54.3% |
| 2007 | -0.74x | $-22.76 Million | $30.81 Million | ▲ +30.7% |
| 2006 | -1.07x | $-19.59 Million | $18.37 Million | ▼ -77.0% |
| 2005 | -0.60x | $-9.28 Million | $15.41 Million | ▲ +50.0% |
| 2004 | -1.21x | $-17.42 Million | $14.45 Million | ▲ +56.9% |
| 2003 | -2.80x | $-39.60 Million | $14.16 Million | ▼ -170.9% |
| 2002 | -1.03x | $-26.46 Million | $25.63 Million | ▲ +51.7% |
| 2001 | -2.14x | $-26.42 Million | $12.36 Million | ▲ +16.3% |
| 2000 | -2.55x | $-20.36 Million | $7.97 Million | ▲ +29.4% |
| 1999 | -3.62x | $-15.10 Million | $4.17 Million | ▼ -62.2% |
| 1998 | -2.23x | $-14.93 Million | $6.69 Million | ▲ +44.7% |
| 1997 | -4.03x | $-8.91 Million | $2.21 Million | ▲ +12.6% |
| 1996 | -4.62x | $-6.00 Million | $1.30 Million | ▼ -44.2% |
| 1995 | -3.20x | $-6.40 Million | $2.00 Million | ▼ -15.2% |
| 1994 | -2.78x | $-5.00 Million | $1.80 Million | ▼ -91.6% |
| 1993 | -1.45x | $-2.90 Million | $2.00 Million | ▼ -59.5% |
| 1992 | -0.91x | $-1.00 Million | $1.10 Million | — |