American Superconductor Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
American Superconductor Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.08x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $16.01 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($189.74 Million) in one year. Check earnings quality score of American Superconductor Corporation to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of American Superconductor Corporation (1992–2026)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of American Superconductor Corporation from 1992 to 2026. Historical debt coverage capacity for American Superconductor Corporation across 35 annual periods. Check total reinvestment intensity of American Superconductor Corporation to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
American Superconductor Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1992–2026)
American Superconductor Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1992 to 2026. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for American Superconductor Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see American Superconductor Corporation cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.12x | $23.15 Million | $196.76 Million | ▼ -52.8% |
| 2025 | 0.25x | $28.29 Million | $113.41 Million | ▲ +928.9% |
| 2024 | 0.02x | $2.14 Million | $88.20 Million | ▲ +110.1% |
| 2023 | -0.24x | $-22.48 Million | $93.76 Million | ▲ +18.5% |
| 2022 | -0.29x | $-18.98 Million | $64.50 Million | ▼ -77.2% |
| 2021 | -0.17x | $-8.68 Million | $52.27 Million | ▲ +47.8% |
| 2020 | -0.32x | $-16.50 Million | $51.89 Million | ▼ -128.4% |
| 2019 | 1.12x | $42.71 Million | $38.14 Million | ▲ +262.2% |
| 2018 | -0.69x | $-24.83 Million | $35.95 Million | ▼ -146.5% |
| 2017 | -0.28x | $-11.21 Million | $40.02 Million | ▼ -218.2% |
| 2016 | -0.09x | $-4.56 Million | $51.77 Million | ▲ +85.5% |
| 2015 | -0.61x | $-32.68 Million | $53.93 Million | ▼ -156.9% |
| 2014 | -0.24x | $-13.27 Million | $56.25 Million | ▲ +52.3% |
| 2013 | -0.49x | $-45.27 Million | $91.64 Million | ▲ +68.4% |
| 2012 | -1.56x | $-141.04 Million | $90.18 Million | ▼ -916.8% |
| 2011 | -0.15x | $-22.82 Million | $148.35 Million | ▼ -145.1% |
| 2010 | 0.34x | $40.68 Million | $119.22 Million | ▲ +1327.1% |
| 2009 | -0.03x | $-2.43 Million | $87.25 Million | ▲ +91.8% |
| 2008 | -0.34x | $-17.82 Million | $52.78 Million | ▲ +54.3% |
| 2007 | -0.74x | $-22.76 Million | $30.81 Million | ▲ +30.7% |
| 2006 | -1.07x | $-19.59 Million | $18.37 Million | ▼ -77.0% |
| 2005 | -0.60x | $-9.28 Million | $15.41 Million | ▲ +50.0% |
| 2004 | -1.21x | $-17.42 Million | $14.45 Million | ▲ +56.9% |
| 2003 | -2.80x | $-39.60 Million | $14.16 Million | ▼ -170.9% |
| 2002 | -1.03x | $-26.46 Million | $25.63 Million | ▲ +51.7% |
| 2001 | -2.14x | $-26.42 Million | $12.36 Million | ▲ +16.3% |
| 2000 | -2.55x | $-20.36 Million | $7.97 Million | ▲ +29.4% |
| 1999 | -3.62x | $-15.10 Million | $4.17 Million | ▼ -62.2% |
| 1998 | -2.23x | $-14.93 Million | $6.69 Million | ▲ +44.7% |
| 1997 | -4.03x | $-8.91 Million | $2.21 Million | ▲ +12.6% |
| 1996 | -4.62x | $-6.00 Million | $1.30 Million | ▼ -44.2% |
| 1995 | -3.20x | $-6.40 Million | $2.00 Million | ▼ -15.2% |
| 1994 | -2.78x | $-5.00 Million | $1.80 Million | ▼ -91.6% |
| 1993 | -1.45x | $-2.90 Million | $2.00 Million | ▼ -59.5% |
| 1992 | -0.91x | $-1.00 Million | $1.10 Million | — |