American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $3.25 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($182.70 Million) in one year. See AMSC free cash flow to operating cash ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
American Superconductor Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for American Superconductor Corporation across 34 annual periods. Also explore AMSC net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for American Superconductor Corporation (1992–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for American Superconductor Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of American Superconductor Corporation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.25x | $28.29 Million | $113.41 Million | ▲ +928.9% |
| 2024 | 0.02x | $2.14 Million | $88.20 Million | ▲ +110.1% |
| 2023 | -0.24x | $-22.48 Million | $93.76 Million | ▲ +18.5% |
| 2022 | -0.29x | $-18.98 Million | $64.50 Million | ▼ -77.2% |
| 2021 | -0.17x | $-8.68 Million | $52.27 Million | ▲ +47.8% |
| 2020 | -0.32x | $-16.50 Million | $51.89 Million | ▼ -128.4% |
| 2019 | 1.12x | $42.71 Million | $38.14 Million | ▲ +262.2% |
| 2018 | -0.69x | $-24.83 Million | $35.95 Million | ▼ -146.5% |
| 2017 | -0.28x | $-11.21 Million | $40.02 Million | ▼ -218.2% |
| 2016 | -0.09x | $-4.56 Million | $51.77 Million | ▲ +85.5% |
| 2015 | -0.61x | $-32.68 Million | $53.93 Million | ▼ -156.9% |
| 2014 | -0.24x | $-13.27 Million | $56.25 Million | ▲ +52.3% |
| 2013 | -0.49x | $-45.27 Million | $91.64 Million | ▲ +68.4% |
| 2012 | -1.56x | $-141.04 Million | $90.18 Million | ▼ -916.8% |
| 2011 | -0.15x | $-22.82 Million | $148.35 Million | ▼ -145.1% |
| 2010 | 0.34x | $40.68 Million | $119.22 Million | ▲ +1327.1% |
| 2009 | -0.03x | $-2.43 Million | $87.25 Million | ▲ +91.8% |
| 2008 | -0.34x | $-17.82 Million | $52.78 Million | ▲ +54.3% |
| 2007 | -0.74x | $-22.76 Million | $30.81 Million | ▲ +30.7% |
| 2006 | -1.07x | $-19.59 Million | $18.37 Million | ▼ -77.0% |
| 2005 | -0.60x | $-9.28 Million | $15.41 Million | ▲ +50.0% |
| 2004 | -1.21x | $-17.42 Million | $14.45 Million | ▲ +56.9% |
| 2003 | -2.80x | $-39.60 Million | $14.16 Million | ▼ -170.9% |
| 2002 | -1.03x | $-26.46 Million | $25.63 Million | ▲ +51.7% |
| 2001 | -2.14x | $-26.42 Million | $12.36 Million | ▲ +16.3% |
| 2000 | -2.55x | $-20.36 Million | $7.97 Million | ▲ +29.4% |
| 1999 | -3.62x | $-15.10 Million | $4.17 Million | ▼ -62.2% |
| 1998 | -2.23x | $-14.93 Million | $6.69 Million | ▲ +44.7% |
| 1997 | -4.03x | $-8.91 Million | $2.21 Million | ▲ +12.6% |
| 1996 | -4.62x | $-6.00 Million | $1.30 Million | ▼ -44.2% |
| 1995 | -3.20x | $-6.40 Million | $2.00 Million | ▼ -15.2% |
| 1994 | -2.78x | $-5.00 Million | $1.80 Million | ▼ -91.6% |
| 1993 | -1.45x | $-2.90 Million | $2.00 Million | ▼ -59.5% |
| 1992 | -0.91x | $-1.00 Million | $1.10 Million | — |