Astrotech Corp (ASTC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Astrotech Corp (ASTC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.85x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-3.54 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities ($4.18 Million) in one year. See ASTC FCF to total liabilities ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Astrotech Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Astrotech Corp across 32 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Astrotech Corp.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Astrotech Corp (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Astrotech Corp. Check how high is Astrotech Corp's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -2.65x | $-12.95 Million | $4.89 Million | ▲ +22.8% |
| 2024 | -3.43x | $-9.72 Million | $2.83 Million | ▼ -33.1% |
| 2023 | -2.58x | $-7.62 Million | $2.96 Million | ▼ -13.4% |
| 2022 | -2.28x | $-6.79 Million | $2.98 Million | ▼ -35.9% |
| 2021 | -1.67x | $-7.41 Million | $4.43 Million | ▼ -28.1% |
| 2020 | -1.31x | $-6.93 Million | $5.30 Million | ▲ +84.8% |
| 2019 | -8.61x | $-8.47 Million | $984.00K | ▲ +8.3% |
| 2018 | -9.39x | $-10.78 Million | $1.15 Million | ▼ -119.9% |
| 2017 | -4.27x | $-8.82 Million | $2.06 Million | ▲ +39.2% |
| 2016 | -7.03x | $-13.32 Million | $1.90 Million | ▼ -61.2% |
| 2015 | -4.36x | $-10.86 Million | $2.49 Million | ▼ -8180.5% |
| 2014 | -0.05x | $-552.00K | $10.48 Million | ▲ +77.3% |
| 2013 | -0.23x | $-2.90 Million | $12.52 Million | ▲ +21.5% |
| 2012 | -0.30x | $-4.11 Million | $13.92 Million | ▼ -164.1% |
| 2011 | 0.46x | $9.23 Million | $20.06 Million | ▲ +31.7% |
| 2010 | 0.35x | $4.44 Million | $12.69 Million | ▲ +29.2% |
| 2009 | 0.27x | $4.97 Million | $18.37 Million | ▲ +173.3% |
| 2008 | -0.37x | $-8.60 Million | $23.27 Million | ▼ -356.9% |
| 2007 | 0.14x | $12.31 Million | $85.61 Million | ▲ +198.3% |
| 2006 | 0.05x | $3.98 Million | $82.64 Million | ▲ +158.7% |
| 2005 | -0.08x | $-7.15 Million | $87.15 Million | ▼ -240.9% |
| 2004 | 0.06x | $5.27 Million | $90.52 Million | ▼ -65.8% |
| 2003 | 0.17x | $19.78 Million | $116.27 Million | ▲ +162.2% |
| 2002 | 0.06x | $8.59 Million | $132.41 Million | ▼ -49.9% |
| 2001 | 0.13x | $17.12 Million | $132.12 Million | ▲ +1014.1% |
| 2000 | 0.01x | $1.42 Million | $122.41 Million | ▲ +120.3% |
| 1999 | -0.06x | $-6.30 Million | $110.10 Million | ▼ -122.5% |
| 1998 | 0.25x | $31.60 Million | $124.20 Million | ▲ +888.7% |
| 1997 | -0.03x | $-900.00K | $27.90 Million | ▼ -110.6% |
| 1996 | 0.30x | $26.80 Million | $88.40 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1995 | 0.30x | $26.80 Million | $88.40 Million | ▲ +61.7% |
| 1994 | 0.19x | $21.83 Million | $116.44 Million | — |