Astec Industries Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Astec Industries Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Astec Industries Inc (ASTE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $11.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($726.40 Million) in one year. Check Astec Industries Inc (ASTE) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Astec Industries Inc (1985–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Astec Industries Inc from 1985 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Astec Industries Inc across 38 annual periods. Check total reinvestment intensity of Astec Industries Inc to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Astec Industries Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1985–2025)
Astec Industries Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1985 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Astec Industries Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see ASTE operating cash flow.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.09x | $61.40 Million | $685.60 Million | ▲ +58.1% |
| 2024 | 0.06x | $23.00 Million | $406.00 Million | ▼ -17.3% |
| 2023 | 0.07x | $27.80 Million | $405.60 Million | ▲ +135.9% |
| 2022 | -0.19x | $-73.90 Million | $387.50 Million | ▼ -761.0% |
| 2021 | 0.03x | $7.40 Million | $256.50 Million | ▼ -95.8% |
| 2020 | 0.69x | $141.50 Million | $205.20 Million | ▲ +21.5% |
| 2019 | 0.57x | $112.43 Million | $198.11 Million | ▲ +614.8% |
| 2018 | -0.11x | $-29.79 Million | $270.17 Million | ▼ -153.4% |
| 2017 | 0.21x | $41.88 Million | $202.81 Million | ▼ -70.2% |
| 2016 | 0.69x | $134.81 Million | $194.76 Million | ▲ +275.6% |
| 2015 | 0.18x | $30.87 Million | $167.50 Million | ▲ +101.4% |
| 2014 | 0.09x | $18.86 Million | $206.11 Million | ▲ +163.5% |
| 2013 | 0.03x | $5.86 Million | $168.78 Million | ▼ -78.6% |
| 2012 | 0.16x | $28.63 Million | $176.57 Million | ▼ -5.8% |
| 2011 | 0.17x | $32.31 Million | $187.70 Million | ▼ -56.5% |
| 2010 | 0.40x | $62.04 Million | $156.83 Million | ▲ +11.5% |
| 2009 | 0.35x | $49.20 Million | $138.64 Million | ▲ +510.8% |
| 2008 | 0.06x | $10.04 Million | $172.78 Million | ▼ -79.0% |
| 2007 | 0.28x | $45.74 Million | $165.10 Million | ▼ -11.3% |
| 2006 | 0.31x | $39.02 Million | $125.00 Million | ▲ +0.4% |
| 2005 | 0.31x | $32.11 Million | $103.25 Million | ▲ +98.0% |
| 2004 | 0.16x | $20.89 Million | $132.99 Million | ▲ +193.7% |
| 2003 | 0.05x | $8.18 Million | $152.95 Million | ▼ -63.7% |
| 2002 | 0.15x | $32.84 Million | $222.61 Million | ▲ +1962.4% |
| 2001 | 0.01x | $1.45 Million | $202.99 Million | ▼ -93.6% |
| 2000 | 0.11x | $23.29 Million | $207.23 Million | ▼ -23.4% |
| 1999 | 0.15x | $27.60 Million | $188.10 Million | ▼ -40.0% |
| 1998 | 0.24x | $28.50 Million | $116.50 Million | ▼ -38.9% |
| 1997 | 0.40x | $34.70 Million | $86.60 Million | ▲ +3149.7% |
| 1996 | -0.01x | $-900.00K | $68.50 Million | ▼ -112.4% |
| 1995 | 0.11x | $6.20 Million | $58.50 Million | ▼ -56.8% |
| 1994 | 0.25x | $16.10 Million | $65.60 Million | ▲ +4.9% |
| 1993 | 0.23x | $9.10 Million | $38.90 Million | ▲ +171.3% |
| 1992 | 0.09x | $5.20 Million | $60.30 Million | ▲ +1.9% |
| 1991 | 0.08x | $5.90 Million | $69.70 Million | ▲ +235.8% |
| 1990 | 0.03x | $2.40 Million | $95.20 Million | ▲ +127.8% |
| 1989 | -0.09x | $-8.60 Million | $94.80 Million | ▼ -107.8% |
| 1985 | 1.16x | $32.60 Million | $28.00 Million | — |