Astec Industries Inc (ASTE) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Astec Industries Inc (ASTE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.06x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $41.80 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($750.80 Million) in one year. See free cash flow generation of Astec Industries Inc to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Astec Industries Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1985–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Astec Industries Inc across 38 annual periods. Also explore Astec Industries Inc (ASTE) equity growth momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Astec Industries Inc (1985–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Astec Industries Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Astec Industries Inc stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.09x | $61.40 Million | $685.60 Million | ▲ +58.1% |
| 2024 | 0.06x | $23.00 Million | $406.00 Million | ▼ -17.3% |
| 2023 | 0.07x | $27.80 Million | $405.60 Million | ▲ +135.9% |
| 2022 | -0.19x | $-73.90 Million | $387.50 Million | ▼ -761.0% |
| 2021 | 0.03x | $7.40 Million | $256.50 Million | ▼ -95.8% |
| 2020 | 0.69x | $141.50 Million | $205.20 Million | ▲ +21.5% |
| 2019 | 0.57x | $112.43 Million | $198.11 Million | ▲ +614.8% |
| 2018 | -0.11x | $-29.79 Million | $270.17 Million | ▼ -153.4% |
| 2017 | 0.21x | $41.88 Million | $202.81 Million | ▼ -70.2% |
| 2016 | 0.69x | $134.81 Million | $194.76 Million | ▲ +275.6% |
| 2015 | 0.18x | $30.87 Million | $167.50 Million | ▲ +101.4% |
| 2014 | 0.09x | $18.86 Million | $206.11 Million | ▲ +163.5% |
| 2013 | 0.03x | $5.86 Million | $168.78 Million | ▼ -78.6% |
| 2012 | 0.16x | $28.63 Million | $176.57 Million | ▼ -5.8% |
| 2011 | 0.17x | $32.31 Million | $187.70 Million | ▼ -56.5% |
| 2010 | 0.40x | $62.04 Million | $156.83 Million | ▲ +11.5% |
| 2009 | 0.35x | $49.20 Million | $138.64 Million | ▲ +510.8% |
| 2008 | 0.06x | $10.04 Million | $172.78 Million | ▼ -79.0% |
| 2007 | 0.28x | $45.74 Million | $165.10 Million | ▼ -11.3% |
| 2006 | 0.31x | $39.02 Million | $125.00 Million | ▲ +0.4% |
| 2005 | 0.31x | $32.11 Million | $103.25 Million | ▲ +98.0% |
| 2004 | 0.16x | $20.89 Million | $132.99 Million | ▲ +193.7% |
| 2003 | 0.05x | $8.18 Million | $152.95 Million | ▼ -63.7% |
| 2002 | 0.15x | $32.84 Million | $222.61 Million | ▲ +1962.4% |
| 2001 | 0.01x | $1.45 Million | $202.99 Million | ▼ -93.6% |
| 2000 | 0.11x | $23.29 Million | $207.23 Million | ▼ -23.4% |
| 1999 | 0.15x | $27.60 Million | $188.10 Million | ▼ -40.0% |
| 1998 | 0.24x | $28.50 Million | $116.50 Million | ▼ -38.9% |
| 1997 | 0.40x | $34.70 Million | $86.60 Million | ▲ +3149.7% |
| 1996 | -0.01x | $-900.00K | $68.50 Million | ▼ -112.4% |
| 1995 | 0.11x | $6.20 Million | $58.50 Million | ▼ -56.8% |
| 1994 | 0.25x | $16.10 Million | $65.60 Million | ▲ +4.9% |
| 1993 | 0.23x | $9.10 Million | $38.90 Million | ▲ +171.3% |
| 1992 | 0.09x | $5.20 Million | $60.30 Million | ▲ +1.9% |
| 1991 | 0.08x | $5.90 Million | $69.70 Million | ▲ +235.8% |
| 1990 | 0.03x | $2.40 Million | $95.20 Million | ▲ +127.8% |
| 1989 | -0.09x | $-8.60 Million | $94.80 Million | ▼ -107.8% |
| 1985 | 1.16x | $32.60 Million | $28.00 Million | — |