Asure Software Inc (ASUR) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Asure Software Inc (ASUR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $4.47 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($280.12 Million) in one year. See Asure Software Inc (ASUR) flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Asure Software Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Asure Software Inc across 36 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Asure Software Inc.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Asure Software Inc (1990–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Asure Software Inc. Check ASUR cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.07x | $22.22 Million | $333.62 Million | ▲ +69.8% |
| 2024 | 0.04x | $9.39 Million | $239.32 Million | ▼ -47.7% |
| 2023 | 0.07x | $18.90 Million | $252.21 Million | ▲ +50.6% |
| 2022 | 0.05x | $13.67 Million | $274.84 Million | ▲ +892.9% |
| 2021 | 0.01x | $1.38 Million | $275.00 Million | ▼ -17.1% |
| 2020 | 0.01x | $2.23 Million | $369.77 Million | ▲ +126.8% |
| 2019 | -0.02x | $-4.12 Million | $182.49 Million | ▲ +18.2% |
| 2018 | -0.03x | $-7.13 Million | $258.58 Million | ▼ -10586.1% |
| 2017 | 0.00x | $-36.00K | $139.54 Million | ▲ +99.1% |
| 2016 | -0.03x | $-2.01 Million | $67.58 Million | ▼ -127.1% |
| 2015 | 0.11x | $3.35 Million | $30.49 Million | ▲ +22.0% |
| 2014 | 0.09x | $2.71 Million | $30.00 Million | ▲ +39.9% |
| 2013 | 0.06x | $2.02 Million | $31.40 Million | ▼ -22.0% |
| 2012 | 0.08x | $2.81 Million | $33.99 Million | ▼ -65.4% |
| 2011 | 0.24x | $3.35 Million | $14.02 Million | ▲ +179.3% |
| 2010 | -0.30x | $-939.00K | $3.11 Million | ▲ +71.4% |
| 2009 | -1.06x | $-4.62 Million | $4.38 Million | ▲ +41.4% |
| 2008 | -1.80x | $-13.31 Million | $7.39 Million | ▼ -233.0% |
| 2007 | 1.36x | $19.88 Million | $14.67 Million | ▲ +956.5% |
| 2006 | -0.16x | $-1.25 Million | $7.87 Million | ▲ +86.5% |
| 2005 | -1.17x | $-7.97 Million | $6.81 Million | ▼ -1764.1% |
| 2004 | 0.07x | $458.00K | $6.51 Million | ▼ -75.8% |
| 2003 | 0.29x | $2.32 Million | $8.00 Million | ▼ -45.5% |
| 2002 | 0.53x | $10.63 Million | $19.94 Million | ▲ +399.3% |
| 2001 | -0.18x | $-4.94 Million | $27.72 Million | ▼ -116.6% |
| 2000 | 1.08x | $43.94 Million | $40.87 Million | ▲ +663.7% |
| 1999 | -0.19x | $-10.70 Million | $56.10 Million | ▼ -146.4% |
| 1998 | 0.41x | $19.75 Million | $48.03 Million | ▲ +246.9% |
| 1997 | -0.28x | $-15.20 Million | $54.30 Million | ▲ +4.9% |
| 1996 | -0.29x | $-5.15 Million | $17.50 Million | ▼ -384.5% |
| 1995 | 0.10x | $1.50 Million | $14.50 Million | ▼ -54.7% |
| 1994 | 0.23x | $2.10 Million | $9.20 Million | ▲ +126.6% |
| 1993 | -0.86x | $-7.90 Million | $9.20 Million | ▲ +42.8% |
| 1992 | -1.50x | $-6.00 Million | $4.00 Million | ▼ -108.3% |
| 1991 | -0.72x | $-3.60 Million | $5.00 Million | ▲ +60.3% |
| 1990 | -1.81x | $-2.90 Million | $1.60 Million | — |