Alterity Therapeutics Ltd (ATHE) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Alterity Therapeutics Ltd (ATHE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -3.94x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-10.43 Million could theoretically repay -4% of its total liabilities ($2.65 Million) in one year. See Alterity Therapeutics Ltd free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Alterity Therapeutics Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2002–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Alterity Therapeutics Ltd across 24 annual periods. Also explore how fast is Alterity Therapeutics Ltd growing its equity to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Alterity Therapeutics Ltd (2002–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Alterity Therapeutics Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Alterity Therapeutics Ltd.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -3.16x | $-11.45 Million | $3.62 Million | ▼ -36.0% |
| 2024 | -2.32x | $-12.61 Million | $5.43 Million | ▲ +47.8% |
| 2023 | -4.45x | $-20.04 Million | $4.50 Million | ▼ -112.5% |
| 2022 | -2.09x | $-12.34 Million | $5.89 Million | ▲ +62.4% |
| 2021 | -5.56x | $-17.33 Million | $3.12 Million | ▼ -62.6% |
| 2020 | -3.42x | $-9.43 Million | $2.76 Million | ▲ +17.8% |
| 2019 | -4.16x | $-13.95 Million | $3.36 Million | ▼ -76.1% |
| 2018 | -2.36x | $-6.25 Million | $2.64 Million | ▲ +36.0% |
| 2017 | -3.69x | $-5.87 Million | $1.59 Million | ▼ -17.2% |
| 2016 | -3.15x | $-7.42 Million | $2.36 Million | ▲ +21.2% |
| 2015 | -4.00x | $-10.87 Million | $2.72 Million | ▼ -14.6% |
| 2014 | -3.49x | $-13.79 Million | $3.95 Million | ▼ -35.9% |
| 2013 | -2.57x | $-7.95 Million | $3.10 Million | ▲ +35.6% |
| 2012 | -3.98x | $-6.85 Million | $1.72 Million | ▼ -81.8% |
| 2011 | -2.19x | $-4.56 Million | $2.08 Million | ▲ +26.8% |
| 2010 | -3.00x | $-4.71 Million | $1.57 Million | ▲ +63.7% |
| 2009 | -8.25x | $-6.99 Million | $847.43K | ▼ -61.0% |
| 2008 | -5.13x | $-9.41 Million | $1.84 Million | ▼ -17.6% |
| 2007 | -4.36x | $-9.20 Million | $2.11 Million | ▲ +36.7% |
| 2006 | -6.89x | $-11.66 Million | $1.69 Million | ▼ -62.5% |
| 2005 | -4.24x | $-11.37 Million | $2.68 Million | ▼ -115.0% |
| 2004 | -1.97x | $-5.31 Million | $2.70 Million | ▲ +68.9% |
| 2003 | -6.34x | $-3.58 Million | $564.54K | ▼ -53.6% |
| 2002 | -4.13x | $-3.77 Million | $912.82K | — |