Axogen Inc (AXGN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Axogen Inc (AXGN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.56 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($44.68 Million) in one year. See how much free cash does Axogen Inc generate to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Axogen Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Axogen Inc across 37 annual periods. Also explore Axogen Inc annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Axogen Inc (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Axogen Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Axogen Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.01x | $812.00K | $92.84 Million | ▼ -80.7% |
| 2024 | 0.05x | $4.54 Million | $99.82 Million | ▲ +180.4% |
| 2023 | -0.06x | $-5.72 Million | $101.16 Million | ▲ +66.8% |
| 2022 | -0.17x | $-16.07 Million | $94.39 Million | ▼ -21.2% |
| 2021 | -0.14x | $-13.40 Million | $95.47 Million | ▼ -14.1% |
| 2020 | -0.12x | $-9.63 Million | $78.23 Million | ▲ +86.1% |
| 2019 | -0.88x | $-19.87 Million | $22.49 Million | ▲ +34.7% |
| 2018 | -1.35x | $-17.86 Million | $13.19 Million | ▼ -393.9% |
| 2017 | -0.27x | $-9.24 Million | $33.69 Million | ▲ +23.1% |
| 2016 | -0.36x | $-11.20 Million | $31.44 Million | ▲ +19.9% |
| 2015 | -0.44x | $-13.05 Million | $29.35 Million | ▼ -17.6% |
| 2014 | -0.38x | $-10.45 Million | $27.65 Million | ▲ +0.3% |
| 2013 | -0.38x | $-10.44 Million | $27.55 Million | ▼ -0.9% |
| 2012 | -0.38x | $-8.66 Million | $23.06 Million | ▲ +65.9% |
| 2011 | -1.10x | $-7.08 Million | $6.42 Million | ▲ +94.8% |
| 2010 | -21.25x | $-2.43 Million | $114.35K | ▼ -890.8% |
| 2009 | 2.69x | $15.44 Million | $5.75 Million | ▲ +220.6% |
| 2008 | -2.23x | $-470.16K | $211.06K | ▲ +4.0% |
| 2007 | -2.32x | $-466.95K | $201.17K | ▼ -1656.4% |
| 2006 | -0.13x | $-28.79K | $217.87K | ▲ +97.0% |
| 2005 | -4.41x | $-709.62K | $160.86K | ▼ -361.5% |
| 2004 | 1.69x | $878.84K | $521.05K | ▲ +17673.5% |
| 2003 | -0.01x | $-27.30K | $2.84 Million | ▲ +96.0% |
| 2002 | -0.24x | $-755.02K | $3.18 Million | ▲ +77.2% |
| 2001 | -1.04x | $-2.92 Million | $2.81 Million | ▼ -207.1% |
| 2000 | -0.34x | $-1.27 Million | $3.75 Million | ▼ -357.3% |
| 1999 | -0.07x | $-200.00K | $2.70 Million | ▼ -110.9% |
| 1998 | 0.68x | $1.50 Million | $2.20 Million | ▲ +1945.5% |
| 1997 | 0.03x | $100.00K | $3.00 Million | ▼ -76.7% |
| 1996 | 0.14x | $200.00K | $1.40 Million | ▲ +114.3% |
| 1995 | 0.07x | $100.00K | $1.50 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1994 | 0.07x | $100.00K | $1.50 Million | ▼ -62.2% |
| 1993 | 0.18x | $300.00K | $1.70 Million | ▼ -91.2% |
| 1992 | 2.00x | $1.40 Million | $700.00K | ▲ +27.3% |
| 1991 | 1.57x | $1.10 Million | $700.00K | ▼ -15.4% |
| 1990 | 1.86x | $1.30 Million | $700.00K | ▲ +364.3% |
| 1989 | 0.40x | $600.00K | $1.50 Million | — |