Biomerica Inc (BMRA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Biomerica Inc (BMRA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.80x as of February 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-1.25 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities ($1.56 Million) in one year. See BMRA free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Biomerica Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Biomerica Inc across 37 annual periods. Also explore BMRA net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Biomerica Inc (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Biomerica Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Biomerica Inc worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -2.09x | $-3.84 Million | $1.84 Million | ▼ -3.7% |
| 2024 | -2.01x | $-5.36 Million | $2.66 Million | ▼ -0.4% |
| 2023 | -2.01x | $-5.47 Million | $2.73 Million | ▼ -1172.5% |
| 2022 | -0.16x | $-480.53K | $3.05 Million | ▲ +92.2% |
| 2021 | -2.03x | $-5.25 Million | $2.59 Million | ▼ -43.7% |
| 2020 | -1.41x | $-4.30 Million | $3.05 Million | ▲ +20.5% |
| 2019 | -1.77x | $-2.24 Million | $1.26 Million | ▼ -35.5% |
| 2018 | -1.31x | $-1.17 Million | $896.81K | ▲ +4.2% |
| 2017 | -1.37x | $-722.86K | $528.87K | ▼ -231.3% |
| 2016 | -0.41x | $-208.78K | $506.03K | ▲ +46.7% |
| 2015 | -0.77x | $-405.48K | $523.93K | ▲ +50.1% |
| 2014 | -1.55x | $-862.27K | $555.84K | ▼ -162.3% |
| 2013 | 2.49x | $1.39 Million | $559.89K | ▲ +900.4% |
| 2012 | 0.25x | $147.41K | $592.29K | ▼ -52.7% |
| 2011 | 0.53x | $328.80K | $625.01K | ▲ +311.4% |
| 2010 | -0.25x | $-236.98K | $952.30K | ▼ -96.2% |
| 2009 | -0.13x | $-102.00K | $804.09K | ▲ +20.2% |
| 2008 | -0.16x | $-194.59K | $1.22 Million | ▼ -150.5% |
| 2007 | 0.32x | $463.71K | $1.47 Million | ▲ +211.6% |
| 2006 | -0.28x | $-385.17K | $1.36 Million | ▼ -974.0% |
| 2005 | 0.03x | $72.92K | $2.26 Million | ▲ +188.4% |
| 2004 | -0.04x | $-75.03K | $2.05 Million | ▼ -116.4% |
| 2003 | 0.22x | $512.54K | $2.30 Million | ▲ +436.5% |
| 2002 | -0.07x | $-131.07K | $1.98 Million | ▼ -211.0% |
| 2001 | 0.06x | $108.95K | $1.83 Million | ▲ +104.3% |
| 2000 | -1.40x | $-2.56 Million | $1.83 Million | ▼ -461.1% |
| 1999 | -0.25x | $-400.00K | $1.60 Million | ▼ -181.3% |
| 1998 | 0.31x | $400.00K | $1.30 Million | ▼ -34.1% |
| 1997 | 0.47x | $700.00K | $1.50 Million | ▲ +86.7% |
| 1996 | 0.25x | $500.00K | $2.00 Million | ▲ +30.0% |
| 1995 | 0.19x | $500.00K | $2.60 Million | ▼ -42.3% |
| 1994 | 0.33x | $1.00 Million | $3.00 Million | ▲ +391.7% |
| 1993 | -0.11x | $-400.00K | $3.50 Million | ▼ -17.1% |
| 1992 | -0.10x | $-400.00K | $4.10 Million | ▼ -142.6% |
| 1991 | 0.23x | $1.10 Million | $4.80 Million | ▲ +604.2% |
| 1990 | -0.05x | $-200.00K | $4.40 Million | ▲ +96.2% |
| 1989 | -1.20x | $-600.00K | $500.00K | — |