CBAK Energy Technology Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
CBAK Energy Technology Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. CBAK Energy Technology Inc (CBAT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.06x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $22.28 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($388.80 Million) in one year. Check how aggressively does CBAK Energy Technology Inc reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of CBAK Energy Technology Inc (1996–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of CBAK Energy Technology Inc from 1996 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for CBAK Energy Technology Inc across 28 annual periods. Check cash flow quality index of CBAK Energy Technology Inc to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CBAK Energy Technology Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2025)
CBAK Energy Technology Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for CBAK Energy Technology Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see CBAT cash generation efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 153.31x | $48.55 Billion | $316.70 Million | ▲ +70234.9% |
| 2024 | 0.22x | $39.70 Million | $182.15 Million | ▼ -21.4% |
| 2023 | 0.28x | $46.51 Million | $167.70 Million | ▲ +119.5% |
| 2022 | 0.13x | $15.11 Million | $119.65 Million | ▲ +460.1% |
| 2021 | -0.04x | $-4.27 Million | $121.73 Million | ▲ +37.8% |
| 2020 | -0.06x | $-5.10 Million | $90.36 Million | ▲ +78.2% |
| 2019 | -0.26x | $-21.22 Million | $81.93 Million | ▼ -477.8% |
| 2018 | 0.07x | $8.73 Million | $127.26 Million | ▲ +66.5% |
| 2017 | 0.04x | $6.22 Million | $150.94 Million | ▲ +117.1% |
| 2016 | -0.24x | $-18.88 Million | $78.22 Million | ▼ -394.0% |
| 2015 | -0.05x | $-2.04 Million | $41.70 Million | ▲ +91.9% |
| 2014 | -0.61x | $-29.30 Million | $48.30 Million | ▼ -1085.6% |
| 2013 | 0.06x | $23.63 Million | $383.88 Million | ▲ +349.1% |
| 2012 | 0.01x | $5.09 Million | $371.15 Million | ▼ -86.8% |
| 2011 | 0.10x | $35.32 Million | $339.97 Million | ▲ +612.4% |
| 2010 | -0.02x | $-6.21 Million | $306.18 Million | ▼ -116.7% |
| 2009 | 0.12x | $38.39 Million | $315.48 Million | ▲ +1056.3% |
| 2008 | 0.01x | $2.70 Million | $256.97 Million | ▼ -24.4% |
| 2007 | 0.01x | $2.99 Million | $214.59 Million | ▲ +134.7% |
| 2006 | -0.04x | $-5.68 Million | $141.97 Million | ▲ +41.1% |
| 2005 | -0.07x | $-6.78 Million | $99.73 Million | ▼ -110.5% |
| 2004 | 0.65x | $12.91K | $20.00K | ▲ +781.5% |
| 2003 | -0.09x | $-4.01K | $42.34K | ▲ +93.9% |
| 2002 | -1.56x | $-7.15K | $4.57K | ▼ -2964.5% |
| 2001 | -0.05x | $-295.00 | $5.78K | ▼ -106.2% |
| 2000 | 0.83x | $2.48K | $3.00K | ▲ +278.4% |
| 1997 | -0.46x | $-1.30 Million | $2.80 Million | ▲ +50.8% |
| 1996 | -0.94x | $-1.70 Million | $1.80 Million | — |