CareDx Inc (CDNA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Latest as of June 2026:
0.28x
CareDx Inc (CDNA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.28x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $30.60 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($107.39 Million) in one year. See CareDx Inc (CDNA) flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
0.28x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities
Operating Cash Flow
$30.60 Million
USD
Total Liabilities
$107.39 Million
USD
Data as of
Jun 2026
Most recent filing
CareDx Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2012–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for CareDx Inc across 14 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see CDNA cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for CareDx Inc (2012–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for CareDx Inc. Check CareDx Inc cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.38x | $42.03 Million | $110.13 Million | ▲ +13.0% |
| 2024 | 0.34x | $38.05 Million | $112.62 Million | ▲ +477.6% |
| 2023 | -0.09x | $-18.39 Million | $205.50 Million | ▲ +60.3% |
| 2022 | -0.23x | $-25.24 Million | $112.08 Million | ▼ -17.6% |
| 2021 | -0.19x | $-19.29 Million | $100.75 Million | ▼ -152.0% |
| 2020 | 0.37x | $33.43 Million | $90.83 Million | ▲ +801.0% |
| 2019 | -0.05x | $-2.77 Million | $52.74 Million | ▲ +54.4% |
| 2018 | -0.12x | $-4.01 Million | $34.77 Million | ▲ +27.9% |
| 2017 | -0.16x | $-14.31 Million | $89.52 Million | ▲ +44.9% |
| 2016 | -0.29x | $-16.52 Million | $56.97 Million | ▲ +22.2% |
| 2015 | -0.37x | $-9.75 Million | $26.14 Million | ▼ -120.9% |
| 2014 | -0.17x | $-3.35 Million | $19.84 Million | ▼ -4864.1% |
| 2013 | 0.00x | $-546.00K | $160.55 Million | ▲ +69.9% |
| 2012 | -0.01x | $-1.78 Million | $157.08 Million | — |
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.