Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.03x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-70.22 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.07 Billion) in one year. See Central Garden & Pet Company free cash flow ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Central Garden & Pet Company Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Central Garden & Pet Company across 34 annual periods. Also explore CENT year-over-year net asset growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Central Garden & Pet Company (1992–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Central Garden & Pet Company. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Central Garden & Pet Company.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.16x | $332.51 Million | $2.04 Billion | ▼ -17.6% |
| 2024 | 0.20x | $394.89 Million | $2.00 Billion | ▼ -0.2% |
| 2023 | 0.20x | $381.63 Million | $1.93 Billion | ▲ +1234.0% |
| 2022 | -0.02x | $-34.03 Million | $1.95 Billion | ▼ -113.2% |
| 2021 | 0.13x | $250.84 Million | $1.89 Billion | ▼ -36.7% |
| 2020 | 0.21x | $264.27 Million | $1.26 Billion | ▲ +5.1% |
| 2019 | 0.20x | $204.97 Million | $1.03 Billion | ▲ +66.6% |
| 2018 | 0.12x | $114.11 Million | $954.38 Million | ▼ -29.9% |
| 2017 | 0.17x | $114.31 Million | $669.76 Million | ▼ -25.9% |
| 2016 | 0.23x | $151.43 Million | $657.61 Million | ▲ +65.5% |
| 2015 | 0.14x | $87.45 Million | $628.37 Million | ▼ -27.1% |
| 2014 | 0.19x | $126.47 Million | $662.27 Million | ▲ +566.7% |
| 2013 | -0.04x | $-28.28 Million | $691.14 Million | ▼ -131.4% |
| 2012 | 0.13x | $89.17 Million | $684.66 Million | ▲ +62.4% |
| 2011 | 0.08x | $51.01 Million | $636.22 Million | ▼ -64.5% |
| 2010 | 0.23x | $135.23 Million | $598.74 Million | ▼ -38.5% |
| 2009 | 0.37x | $221.64 Million | $603.59 Million | ▲ +138.7% |
| 2008 | 0.15x | $115.03 Million | $747.89 Million | ▲ +246.4% |
| 2007 | 0.04x | $38.53 Million | $868.01 Million | ▼ -62.4% |
| 2006 | 0.12x | $95.17 Million | $805.30 Million | ▲ +4.4% |
| 2005 | 0.11x | $57.66 Million | $509.17 Million | ▼ -15.0% |
| 2004 | 0.13x | $64.41 Million | $483.40 Million | ▲ +5.1% |
| 2003 | 0.13x | $51.20 Million | $404.00 Million | ▼ -38.3% |
| 2002 | 0.21x | $72.81 Million | $354.45 Million | ▲ +144.2% |
| 2001 | 0.08x | $38.81 Million | $461.31 Million | ▲ +1.5% |
| 2000 | 0.08x | $40.08 Million | $483.47 Million | ▼ -40.0% |
| 1999 | 0.14x | $63.60 Million | $460.10 Million | ▲ +52.5% |
| 1998 | 0.09x | $30.80 Million | $339.90 Million | ▲ +146.3% |
| 1997 | 0.04x | $10.20 Million | $277.20 Million | ▲ +117.5% |
| 1996 | -0.21x | $-32.40 Million | $154.10 Million | ▼ -310.9% |
| 1995 | 0.10x | $10.40 Million | $104.30 Million | ▲ +78.6% |
| 1994 | 0.06x | $5.70 Million | $102.10 Million | ▲ +5.8% |
| 1993 | 0.05x | $5.70 Million | $108.00 Million | ▲ +906.7% |
| 1992 | -0.01x | $-700.00K | $107.00 Million | — |