Cerus Corporation (CERS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Cerus Corporation (CERS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-3.05 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($154.62 Million) in one year. See CERS free cash flow to operating cash ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cerus Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Cerus Corporation across 29 annual periods. Also explore Cerus Corporation equity growth rate to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Cerus Corporation (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Cerus Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see CERS market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.07x | $11.36 Million | $156.89 Million | ▼ -8.2% |
| 2024 | 0.08x | $11.36 Million | $144.02 Million | ▲ +126.4% |
| 2023 | -0.30x | $-43.17 Million | $144.30 Million | ▼ -74.6% |
| 2022 | -0.17x | $-25.61 Million | $149.53 Million | ▲ +23.3% |
| 2021 | -0.22x | $-33.92 Million | $151.88 Million | ▲ +37.2% |
| 2020 | -0.36x | $-41.81 Million | $117.61 Million | ▲ +41.1% |
| 2019 | -0.60x | $-65.50 Million | $108.48 Million | ▼ -52.5% |
| 2018 | -0.40x | $-31.25 Million | $78.94 Million | ▲ +55.1% |
| 2017 | -0.88x | $-52.23 Million | $59.30 Million | ▲ +24.8% |
| 2016 | -1.17x | $-53.53 Million | $45.69 Million | ▼ -2.4% |
| 2015 | -1.14x | $-51.13 Million | $44.70 Million | ▼ -15.1% |
| 2014 | -0.99x | $-39.81 Million | $40.06 Million | ▼ -50.5% |
| 2013 | -0.66x | $-26.80 Million | $40.59 Million | ▼ -41.4% |
| 2012 | -0.47x | $-13.92 Million | $29.81 Million | ▲ +19.2% |
| 2011 | -0.58x | $-15.63 Million | $27.05 Million | ▼ -0.1% |
| 2010 | -0.58x | $-14.11 Million | $24.43 Million | ▲ +48.6% |
| 2009 | -1.12x | $-14.66 Million | $13.04 Million | ▲ +57.5% |
| 2008 | -2.64x | $-34.55 Million | $13.06 Million | ▼ -29.6% |
| 2007 | -2.04x | $-37.40 Million | $18.32 Million | ▼ -106.4% |
| 2006 | -0.99x | $-14.69 Million | $14.85 Million | ▼ -54.8% |
| 2005 | -0.64x | $-14.95 Million | $23.39 Million | ▼ -304.7% |
| 2004 | -0.16x | $-12.73 Million | $80.59 Million | ▲ +82.2% |
| 2003 | -0.89x | $-58.62 Million | $65.94 Million | ▲ +73.2% |
| 2002 | -3.32x | $-55.65 Million | $16.78 Million | ▼ -62.1% |
| 2001 | -2.05x | $-44.00 Million | $21.50 Million | ▲ +21.8% |
| 2000 | -2.62x | $-32.03 Million | $12.24 Million | ▲ +30.8% |
| 1999 | -3.78x | $-33.30 Million | $8.80 Million | ▼ -664.6% |
| 1998 | -0.49x | $-9.70 Million | $19.60 Million | ▲ +85.7% |
| 1997 | -3.46x | $-16.60 Million | $4.80 Million | — |