Cerus Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Cerus Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Cerus Corporation (CERS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-3.05 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($154.62 Million) in one year. Check Cerus Corporation cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Cerus Corporation (1997–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Cerus Corporation from 1997 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Cerus Corporation across 29 annual periods. Check Cerus Corporation investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Cerus Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1997–2025)
Cerus Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1997 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Cerus Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Cerus Corporation cash conversion from operations.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.07x | $11.36 Million | $156.89 Million | ▼ -8.2% |
| 2024 | 0.08x | $11.36 Million | $144.02 Million | ▲ +126.4% |
| 2023 | -0.30x | $-43.17 Million | $144.30 Million | ▼ -74.6% |
| 2022 | -0.17x | $-25.61 Million | $149.53 Million | ▲ +23.3% |
| 2021 | -0.22x | $-33.92 Million | $151.88 Million | ▲ +37.2% |
| 2020 | -0.36x | $-41.81 Million | $117.61 Million | ▲ +41.1% |
| 2019 | -0.60x | $-65.50 Million | $108.48 Million | ▼ -52.5% |
| 2018 | -0.40x | $-31.25 Million | $78.94 Million | ▲ +55.1% |
| 2017 | -0.88x | $-52.23 Million | $59.30 Million | ▲ +24.8% |
| 2016 | -1.17x | $-53.53 Million | $45.69 Million | ▼ -2.4% |
| 2015 | -1.14x | $-51.13 Million | $44.70 Million | ▼ -15.1% |
| 2014 | -0.99x | $-39.81 Million | $40.06 Million | ▼ -50.5% |
| 2013 | -0.66x | $-26.80 Million | $40.59 Million | ▼ -41.4% |
| 2012 | -0.47x | $-13.92 Million | $29.81 Million | ▲ +19.2% |
| 2011 | -0.58x | $-15.63 Million | $27.05 Million | ▼ -0.1% |
| 2010 | -0.58x | $-14.11 Million | $24.43 Million | ▲ +48.6% |
| 2009 | -1.12x | $-14.66 Million | $13.04 Million | ▲ +57.5% |
| 2008 | -2.64x | $-34.55 Million | $13.06 Million | ▼ -29.6% |
| 2007 | -2.04x | $-37.40 Million | $18.32 Million | ▼ -106.4% |
| 2006 | -0.99x | $-14.69 Million | $14.85 Million | ▼ -54.8% |
| 2005 | -0.64x | $-14.95 Million | $23.39 Million | ▼ -304.7% |
| 2004 | -0.16x | $-12.73 Million | $80.59 Million | ▲ +82.2% |
| 2003 | -0.89x | $-58.62 Million | $65.94 Million | ▲ +73.2% |
| 2002 | -3.32x | $-55.65 Million | $16.78 Million | ▼ -62.1% |
| 2001 | -2.05x | $-44.00 Million | $21.50 Million | ▲ +21.8% |
| 2000 | -2.62x | $-32.03 Million | $12.24 Million | ▲ +30.8% |
| 1999 | -3.78x | $-33.30 Million | $8.80 Million | ▼ -664.6% |
| 1998 | -0.49x | $-9.70 Million | $19.60 Million | ▲ +85.7% |
| 1997 | -3.46x | $-16.60 Million | $4.80 Million | — |