Cerus Corporation (CERS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Cerus Corporation (CERS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-3.05 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($154.62 Million) in one year. Check how aggressively does Cerus Corporation reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cerus Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Cerus Corporation across 29 annual periods. Also explore Cerus Corporation assets under control for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Cerus Corporation (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Cerus Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Cerus Corporation market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.07x | $11.36 Million | $156.89 Million | ▼ -8.2% |
| 2024 | 0.08x | $11.36 Million | $144.02 Million | ▲ +126.4% |
| 2023 | -0.30x | $-43.17 Million | $144.30 Million | ▼ -74.6% |
| 2022 | -0.17x | $-25.61 Million | $149.53 Million | ▲ +23.3% |
| 2021 | -0.22x | $-33.92 Million | $151.88 Million | ▲ +37.2% |
| 2020 | -0.36x | $-41.81 Million | $117.61 Million | ▲ +41.1% |
| 2019 | -0.60x | $-65.50 Million | $108.48 Million | ▼ -52.5% |
| 2018 | -0.40x | $-31.25 Million | $78.94 Million | ▲ +55.1% |
| 2017 | -0.88x | $-52.23 Million | $59.30 Million | ▲ +24.8% |
| 2016 | -1.17x | $-53.53 Million | $45.69 Million | ▼ -2.4% |
| 2015 | -1.14x | $-51.13 Million | $44.70 Million | ▼ -15.1% |
| 2014 | -0.99x | $-39.81 Million | $40.06 Million | ▼ -50.5% |
| 2013 | -0.66x | $-26.80 Million | $40.59 Million | ▼ -41.4% |
| 2012 | -0.47x | $-13.92 Million | $29.81 Million | ▲ +19.2% |
| 2011 | -0.58x | $-15.63 Million | $27.05 Million | ▼ -0.1% |
| 2010 | -0.58x | $-14.11 Million | $24.43 Million | ▲ +48.6% |
| 2009 | -1.12x | $-14.66 Million | $13.04 Million | ▲ +57.5% |
| 2008 | -2.64x | $-34.55 Million | $13.06 Million | ▼ -29.6% |
| 2007 | -2.04x | $-37.40 Million | $18.32 Million | ▼ -106.4% |
| 2006 | -0.99x | $-14.69 Million | $14.85 Million | ▼ -54.8% |
| 2005 | -0.64x | $-14.95 Million | $23.39 Million | ▼ -304.7% |
| 2004 | -0.16x | $-12.73 Million | $80.59 Million | ▲ +82.2% |
| 2003 | -0.89x | $-58.62 Million | $65.94 Million | ▲ +73.2% |
| 2002 | -3.32x | $-55.65 Million | $16.78 Million | ▼ -62.1% |
| 2001 | -2.05x | $-44.00 Million | $21.50 Million | ▲ +21.8% |
| 2000 | -2.62x | $-32.03 Million | $12.24 Million | ▲ +30.8% |
| 1999 | -3.78x | $-33.30 Million | $8.80 Million | ▼ -664.6% |
| 1998 | -0.49x | $-9.70 Million | $19.60 Million | ▲ +85.7% |
| 1997 | -3.46x | $-16.60 Million | $4.80 Million | — |