Clearfield Inc (CLFD) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Clearfield Inc (CLFD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.05x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-1.07 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($20.74 Million) in one year. See Clearfield Inc free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Clearfield Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Clearfield Inc across 32 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Clearfield Inc to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Clearfield Inc (1991–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Clearfield Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Clearfield Inc (CLFD) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.59x | $29.45 Million | $50.01 Million | ▲ +4.7% |
| 2024 | 0.56x | $22.22 Million | $39.51 Million | ▲ +13.4% |
| 2023 | 0.50x | $20.01 Million | $40.35 Million | ▲ +3939.5% |
| 2022 | 0.01x | $1.00 Million | $81.55 Million | ▼ -97.5% |
| 2021 | 0.49x | $10.90 Million | $22.09 Million | ▼ -7.0% |
| 2020 | 0.53x | $6.66 Million | $12.54 Million | ▼ -75.0% |
| 2019 | 2.12x | $14.73 Million | $6.96 Million | ▲ +149.4% |
| 2018 | 0.85x | $4.55 Million | $5.35 Million | ▼ -33.0% |
| 2017 | 1.27x | $6.30 Million | $4.97 Million | ▼ -12.2% |
| 2016 | 1.44x | $11.55 Million | $8.00 Million | ▲ +33.9% |
| 2015 | 1.08x | $6.85 Million | $6.35 Million | ▼ -52.3% |
| 2014 | 2.26x | $11.53 Million | $5.10 Million | ▲ +230.0% |
| 2013 | 0.68x | $4.34 Million | $6.34 Million | ▼ -45.3% |
| 2012 | 1.25x | $3.83 Million | $3.05 Million | ▼ -3.7% |
| 2011 | 1.30x | $5.30 Million | $4.07 Million | ▲ +337.1% |
| 2010 | 0.30x | $629.35K | $2.11 Million | ▼ -63.3% |
| 2009 | 0.81x | $2.09 Million | $2.58 Million | ▲ +36.4% |
| 2008 | 0.59x | $2.02 Million | $3.41 Million | ▲ +317.4% |
| 2007 | -0.27x | $-855.16K | $3.13 Million | ▲ +66.5% |
| 2006 | -0.82x | $-3.28 Million | $4.01 Million | ▼ -26.9% |
| 2005 | -0.64x | $-2.03 Million | $3.15 Million | ▲ +60.0% |
| 2004 | -1.61x | $-5.60 Million | $3.48 Million | ▼ -0.5% |
| 2003 | -1.60x | $-4.66 Million | $2.91 Million | ▲ +2.0% |
| 2002 | -1.63x | $-3.75 Million | $2.30 Million | ▼ -165.8% |
| 2001 | -0.61x | $-2.23 Million | $3.63 Million | ▲ +42.7% |
| 2000 | -1.07x | $-3.54 Million | $3.30 Million | ▼ -82.0% |
| 1999 | -0.59x | $-2.00 Million | $3.40 Million | ▼ -311.8% |
| 1998 | -0.14x | $-500.00K | $3.50 Million | ▼ -192.9% |
| 1997 | 0.15x | $600.00K | $3.90 Million | ▲ +238.5% |
| 1996 | 0.05x | $200.00K | $4.40 Million | ▼ -84.1% |
| 1995 | 0.29x | $200.00K | $700.00K | ▲ +235.7% |
| 1991 | -0.21x | $-400.00K | $1.90 Million | — |