Clearfield Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Clearfield Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Clearfield Inc (CLFD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.47x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $9.86 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($21.17 Million) in one year. Check Clearfield Inc total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Clearfield Inc (1991–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Clearfield Inc from 1991 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Clearfield Inc across 32 annual periods. Check how high is Clearfield Inc's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Clearfield Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1991–2025)
Clearfield Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1991 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Clearfield Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see CLFD cash flow metrics.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.59x | $29.45 Million | $50.01 Million | ▲ +4.7% |
| 2024 | 0.56x | $22.22 Million | $39.51 Million | ▲ +13.4% |
| 2023 | 0.50x | $20.01 Million | $40.35 Million | ▲ +3939.5% |
| 2022 | 0.01x | $1.00 Million | $81.55 Million | ▼ -97.5% |
| 2021 | 0.49x | $10.90 Million | $22.09 Million | ▼ -7.0% |
| 2020 | 0.53x | $6.66 Million | $12.54 Million | ▼ -75.0% |
| 2019 | 2.12x | $14.73 Million | $6.96 Million | ▲ +149.4% |
| 2018 | 0.85x | $4.55 Million | $5.35 Million | ▼ -33.0% |
| 2017 | 1.27x | $6.30 Million | $4.97 Million | ▼ -12.2% |
| 2016 | 1.44x | $11.55 Million | $8.00 Million | ▲ +33.9% |
| 2015 | 1.08x | $6.85 Million | $6.35 Million | ▼ -52.3% |
| 2014 | 2.26x | $11.53 Million | $5.10 Million | ▲ +230.0% |
| 2013 | 0.68x | $4.34 Million | $6.34 Million | ▼ -45.3% |
| 2012 | 1.25x | $3.83 Million | $3.05 Million | ▼ -3.7% |
| 2011 | 1.30x | $5.30 Million | $4.07 Million | ▲ +337.1% |
| 2010 | 0.30x | $629.35K | $2.11 Million | ▼ -63.3% |
| 2009 | 0.81x | $2.09 Million | $2.58 Million | ▲ +36.4% |
| 2008 | 0.59x | $2.02 Million | $3.41 Million | ▲ +317.4% |
| 2007 | -0.27x | $-855.16K | $3.13 Million | ▲ +66.5% |
| 2006 | -0.82x | $-3.28 Million | $4.01 Million | ▼ -26.9% |
| 2005 | -0.64x | $-2.03 Million | $3.15 Million | ▲ +60.0% |
| 2004 | -1.61x | $-5.60 Million | $3.48 Million | ▼ -0.5% |
| 2003 | -1.60x | $-4.66 Million | $2.91 Million | ▲ +2.0% |
| 2002 | -1.63x | $-3.75 Million | $2.30 Million | ▼ -165.8% |
| 2001 | -0.61x | $-2.23 Million | $3.63 Million | ▲ +42.7% |
| 2000 | -1.07x | $-3.54 Million | $3.30 Million | ▼ -82.0% |
| 1999 | -0.59x | $-2.00 Million | $3.40 Million | ▼ -311.8% |
| 1998 | -0.14x | $-500.00K | $3.50 Million | ▼ -192.9% |
| 1997 | 0.15x | $600.00K | $3.90 Million | ▲ +238.5% |
| 1996 | 0.05x | $200.00K | $4.40 Million | ▼ -84.1% |
| 1995 | 0.29x | $200.00K | $700.00K | ▲ +235.7% |
| 1991 | -0.21x | $-400.00K | $1.90 Million | — |