Cintas Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Cintas Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Cintas Corporation (CTAS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.13x as of May 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $709.10 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($5.39 Billion) in one year. Check CTAS cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Cintas Corporation (1990–2026)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Cintas Corporation from 1990 to 2026. Historical debt coverage capacity for Cintas Corporation across 37 annual periods. Check total reinvestment intensity of Cintas Corporation to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Cintas Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1990–2026)
Cintas Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1990 to 2026. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Cintas Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see CTAS operating cash flow.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.42x | $2.28 Billion | $5.39 Billion | ▲ +0.3% |
| 2025 | 0.42x | $2.17 Billion | $5.14 Billion | ▲ +4.6% |
| 2024 | 0.40x | $2.08 Billion | $5.16 Billion | ▲ +25.1% |
| 2023 | 0.32x | $1.60 Billion | $4.96 Billion | ▲ +7.2% |
| 2022 | 0.30x | $1.54 Billion | $5.12 Billion | ▲ +7.4% |
| 2021 | 0.28x | $1.36 Billion | $4.87 Billion | ▲ +2.7% |
| 2020 | 0.27x | $1.29 Billion | $4.74 Billion | ▲ +18.1% |
| 2019 | 0.23x | $1.07 Billion | $4.63 Billion | ▼ -5.8% |
| 2018 | 0.24x | $964.16 Million | $3.94 Billion | ▲ +51.7% |
| 2017 | 0.16x | $763.89 Million | $4.74 Billion | ▼ -17.4% |
| 2016 | 0.20x | $465.85 Million | $2.39 Billion | ▼ -24.0% |
| 2015 | 0.26x | $580.28 Million | $2.26 Billion | ▼ -4.2% |
| 2014 | 0.27x | $607.97 Million | $2.27 Billion | ▲ +3.9% |
| 2013 | 0.26x | $552.75 Million | $2.14 Billion | ▲ +10.9% |
| 2012 | 0.23x | $469.86 Million | $2.02 Billion | ▲ +39.7% |
| 2011 | 0.17x | $340.89 Million | $2.05 Billion | ▼ -57.5% |
| 2010 | 0.39x | $561.57 Million | $1.44 Billion | ▲ +1.1% |
| 2009 | 0.39x | $523.52 Million | $1.35 Billion | ▲ +10.4% |
| 2008 | 0.35x | $544.54 Million | $1.55 Billion | ▲ +9.3% |
| 2007 | 0.32x | $449.39 Million | $1.40 Billion | ▼ -7.4% |
| 2006 | 0.35x | $461.89 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▼ -20.2% |
| 2005 | 0.43x | $414.21 Million | $955.61 Million | ▼ -21.6% |
| 2004 | 0.55x | $509.71 Million | $922.33 Million | ▲ +56.5% |
| 2003 | 0.35x | $330.69 Million | $936.61 Million | ▲ +2.5% |
| 2002 | 0.34x | $377.43 Million | $1.10 Billion | ▼ -27.3% |
| 2001 | 0.47x | $246.96 Million | $520.91 Million | ▼ -1.1% |
| 2000 | 0.48x | $258.03 Million | $538.47 Million | ▲ +26.6% |
| 1999 | 0.38x | $203.10 Million | $536.40 Million | ▲ +15.9% |
| 1998 | 0.33x | $118.70 Million | $363.30 Million | ▼ -30.0% |
| 1997 | 0.47x | $116.40 Million | $249.40 Million | ▼ -0.6% |
| 1996 | 0.47x | $112.40 Million | $239.30 Million | ▲ +44.7% |
| 1995 | 0.32x | $75.30 Million | $231.90 Million | ▼ -12.7% |
| 1994 | 0.37x | $71.40 Million | $191.90 Million | ▼ -13.7% |
| 1993 | 0.43x | $81.60 Million | $189.30 Million | ▼ -7.6% |
| 1992 | 0.47x | $63.20 Million | $135.40 Million | ▲ +27.8% |
| 1991 | 0.37x | $43.90 Million | $120.20 Million | ▼ -18.0% |
| 1990 | 0.45x | $43.10 Million | $96.80 Million | — |