Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp Class A (CTSH) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp Class A (CTSH) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.09x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $558.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($6.36 Billion) in one year. See Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp Clas leverage flexibility ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp Class A Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp Class A across 28 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp Clas (CTSH) cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp Class A (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp Class A. Check cash flow quality index of Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp Clas to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.51x | $2.88 Billion | $5.68 Billion | ▲ +32.9% |
| 2024 | 0.38x | $2.12 Billion | $5.56 Billion | ▼ -13.8% |
| 2023 | 0.44x | $2.33 Billion | $5.26 Billion | ▼ -4.3% |
| 2022 | 0.46x | $2.57 Billion | $5.54 Billion | ▲ +8.8% |
| 2021 | 0.43x | $2.50 Billion | $5.86 Billion | ▼ -21.5% |
| 2020 | 0.54x | $3.30 Billion | $6.09 Billion | ▲ +12.4% |
| 2019 | 0.48x | $2.50 Billion | $5.18 Billion | ▼ -16.5% |
| 2018 | 0.58x | $2.59 Billion | $4.49 Billion | ▲ +9.2% |
| 2017 | 0.53x | $2.41 Billion | $4.55 Billion | ▲ +15.3% |
| 2016 | 0.46x | $1.62 Billion | $3.53 Billion | ▼ -19.3% |
| 2015 | 0.57x | $2.15 Billion | $3.79 Billion | ▲ +53.6% |
| 2014 | 0.37x | $1.47 Billion | $3.98 Billion | ▼ -46.1% |
| 2013 | 0.69x | $1.42 Billion | $2.07 Billion | ▼ -2.4% |
| 2012 | 0.70x | $1.17 Billion | $1.67 Billion | ▲ +25.0% |
| 2011 | 0.56x | $875.15 Million | $1.56 Billion | ▼ -26.5% |
| 2010 | 0.77x | $764.65 Million | $998.64 Million | ▼ -22.0% |
| 2009 | 0.98x | $672.33 Million | $685.06 Million | ▼ -6.6% |
| 2008 | 1.05x | $429.70 Million | $408.98 Million | ▲ +12.9% |
| 2007 | 0.93x | $344.32 Million | $370.10 Million | ▼ -7.1% |
| 2006 | 1.00x | $252.88 Million | $252.48 Million | ▼ -2.4% |
| 2005 | 1.03x | $159.76 Million | $155.75 Million | ▼ -4.0% |
| 2004 | 1.07x | $127.33 Million | $119.22 Million | ▲ +15.7% |
| 2003 | 0.92x | $79.86 Million | $86.52 Million | ▲ +7.5% |
| 2002 | 0.86x | $56.68 Million | $65.99 Million | ▲ +23.7% |
| 2001 | 0.69x | $32.08 Million | $46.19 Million | ▼ -0.2% |
| 2000 | 0.70x | $30.22 Million | $43.42 Million | ▼ -12.1% |
| 1999 | 0.79x | $18.60 Million | $23.50 Million | ▲ +12.8% |
| 1998 | 0.70x | $13.40 Million | $19.10 Million | — |