DeFi Technologies Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
DeFi Technologies Inc. cash flow-to-debt ratio. DeFi Technologies Inc. (DEFT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.37 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($430.13 Million) in one year. Check earnings quality score of DeFi Technologies Inc. to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of DeFi Technologies Inc. (2000–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of DeFi Technologies Inc. from 2000 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for DeFi Technologies Inc. across 26 annual periods. Check DEFT capex plus investments ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
DeFi Technologies Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2000–2025)
DeFi Technologies Inc. cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2000 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for DeFi Technologies Inc.. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of DeFi Technologies Inc..
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.20x | $-133.36 Million | $675.01 Million | ▼ -97.3% |
| 2024 | -0.10x | $-129.96 Million | $1.30 Billion | ▼ -205.6% |
| 2023 | -0.03x | $-18.83 Million | $574.75 Million | ▲ +94.0% |
| 2022 | -0.54x | $-90.08 Million | $166.09 Million | ▲ +39.0% |
| 2021 | -0.89x | $-326.92 Million | $367.91 Million | ▲ +42.9% |
| 2020 | -1.56x | $-1.21 Million | $778.14K | ▼ -350.4% |
| 2019 | -0.35x | $-476.75K | $1.38 Million | ▲ +81.0% |
| 2018 | -1.82x | $-2.15 Million | $1.18 Million | ▼ -17.4% |
| 2017 | -1.55x | $-1.48 Million | $953.61K | ▲ +44.1% |
| 2016 | -2.77x | $-1.99 Million | $716.12K | ▼ -743.1% |
| 2015 | -0.33x | $-482.46K | $1.47 Million | ▼ -119.7% |
| 2014 | -0.15x | $-435.22K | $2.90 Million | ▼ -245.8% |
| 2013 | -0.04x | $-205.89K | $4.75 Million | ▲ +96.5% |
| 2012 | -1.25x | $-1.39 Million | $1.12 Million | ▲ +43.8% |
| 2011 | -2.22x | $-3.10 Million | $1.39 Million | ▼ -62.5% |
| 2010 | -1.37x | $-1.93 Million | $1.41 Million | ▲ +28.1% |
| 2009 | -1.90x | $-1.52 Million | $801.47K | ▲ +58.2% |
| 2008 | -4.54x | $-416.23K | $91.60K | ▼ -48.2% |
| 2007 | -3.07x | $-332.34K | $108.40K | ▲ +78.5% |
| 2006 | -14.26x | $-532.85K | $37.35K | ▼ -131.9% |
| 2005 | -6.15x | $-440.26K | $71.56K | ▼ -1704.0% |
| 2004 | -0.34x | $-77.94K | $228.55K | ▲ +82.1% |
| 2003 | -1.91x | $-62.22K | $32.61K | ▼ -193.9% |
| 2002 | -0.65x | $-59.12K | $91.08K | ▲ +23.6% |
| 2001 | -0.85x | $-59.38K | $69.90K | ▼ -87.6% |
| 2000 | -0.45x | $-70.36K | $155.39K | — |