Durect Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Durect Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Durect Corporation (DRRX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.21x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-1.76 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($8.54 Million) in one year. Check DRRX cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Durect Corporation (1999–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Durect Corporation from 1999 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Durect Corporation across 26 annual periods. Check Durect Corporation cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Durect Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1999–2024)
Durect Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1999 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Durect Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Durect Corporation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -2.07x | $-19.09 Million | $9.22 Million | ▼ -82.9% |
| 2023 | -1.13x | $-34.41 Million | $30.41 Million | ▼ -51.2% |
| 2022 | -0.75x | $-26.28 Million | $35.12 Million | ▲ +31.4% |
| 2021 | -1.09x | $-37.31 Million | $34.21 Million | ▼ -0.1% |
| 2020 | -1.09x | $-38.70 Million | $35.53 Million | ▼ -719.9% |
| 2019 | 0.18x | $11.10 Million | $63.16 Million | ▲ +126.7% |
| 2018 | -0.66x | $-19.75 Million | $30.00 Million | ▼ -1450.3% |
| 2017 | -0.04x | $-1.34 Million | $31.62 Million | ▲ +95.0% |
| 2016 | -0.85x | $-27.29 Million | $32.17 Million | ▼ -31.6% |
| 2015 | -0.64x | $-20.55 Million | $31.89 Million | ▼ -43.2% |
| 2014 | -0.45x | $-14.21 Million | $31.57 Million | ▲ +70.6% |
| 2013 | -1.53x | $-15.45 Million | $10.10 Million | ▼ -9.2% |
| 2012 | -1.40x | $-13.45 Million | $9.60 Million | ▼ -268.2% |
| 2011 | -0.38x | $-17.39 Million | $45.72 Million | ▼ -360.0% |
| 2010 | 0.15x | $7.76 Million | $53.07 Million | ▲ +121.5% |
| 2009 | -0.68x | $-20.89 Million | $30.73 Million | ▼ -177.1% |
| 2008 | -0.25x | $-9.43 Million | $38.45 Million | ▲ +33.7% |
| 2007 | -0.37x | $-18.30 Million | $49.44 Million | ▼ -155.5% |
| 2006 | -0.14x | $-9.48 Million | $65.45 Million | ▼ -48.7% |
| 2005 | -0.10x | $-7.21 Million | $74.06 Million | ▲ +70.6% |
| 2004 | -0.33x | $-22.21 Million | $67.08 Million | ▼ -15.8% |
| 2003 | -0.29x | $-19.25 Million | $67.29 Million | ▲ +93.8% |
| 2002 | -4.61x | $-31.31 Million | $6.79 Million | ▼ -62.3% |
| 2001 | -2.84x | $-22.43 Million | $7.89 Million | ▼ -2.2% |
| 2000 | -2.78x | $-14.89 Million | $5.36 Million | ▲ +33.7% |
| 1999 | -4.19x | $-7.27 Million | $1.74 Million | — |