Dynavax Technologies Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Dynavax Technologies Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Dynavax Technologies Corporation (DVAX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.08x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $33.83 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($412.37 Million) in one year. Check Dynavax Technologies Corporation (DVAX) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Dynavax Technologies Corporation (2002–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Dynavax Technologies Corporation from 2002 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Dynavax Technologies Corporation across 23 annual periods. Check Dynavax Technologies Corporation (DVAX) reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Dynavax Technologies Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2002–2024)
Dynavax Technologies Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2002 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Dynavax Technologies Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see DVAX cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.17x | $66.51 Million | $389.46 Million | ▼ -36.3% |
| 2023 | 0.27x | $100.56 Million | $375.02 Million | ▲ +73.1% |
| 2022 | 0.15x | $62.72 Million | $404.84 Million | ▼ -62.3% |
| 2021 | 0.41x | $335.53 Million | $816.87 Million | ▲ +231.2% |
| 2020 | -0.31x | $-92.25 Million | $294.58 Million | ▲ +30.1% |
| 2019 | -0.45x | $-121.25 Million | $270.78 Million | ▲ +49.6% |
| 2018 | -0.89x | $-131.30 Million | $147.82 Million | ▲ +78.0% |
| 2017 | -4.03x | $-77.52 Million | $19.24 Million | ▲ +22.9% |
| 2016 | -5.23x | $-107.05 Million | $20.48 Million | ▼ -66.9% |
| 2015 | -3.13x | $-92.56 Million | $29.55 Million | ▼ -60.6% |
| 2014 | -1.95x | $-73.74 Million | $37.81 Million | ▲ +39.1% |
| 2013 | -3.20x | $-58.67 Million | $18.33 Million | ▼ -82.1% |
| 2012 | -1.76x | $-43.81 Million | $24.93 Million | ▼ -27.7% |
| 2011 | -1.38x | $-47.12 Million | $34.22 Million | ▲ +13.9% |
| 2010 | -1.60x | $-51.37 Million | $32.14 Million | ▼ -110.1% |
| 2009 | -0.76x | $-33.55 Million | $44.09 Million | ▼ -232.6% |
| 2008 | -0.23x | $-17.04 Million | $74.47 Million | ▲ +41.9% |
| 2007 | -0.39x | $-32.03 Million | $81.32 Million | ▲ +74.8% |
| 2006 | -1.56x | $-37.24 Million | $23.82 Million | ▲ +60.8% |
| 2005 | -3.99x | $-22.86 Million | $5.73 Million | ▼ -649.2% |
| 2004 | -0.53x | $-7.33 Million | $13.77 Million | ▼ -228.2% |
| 2003 | -0.16x | $-14.41 Million | $88.78 Million | ▲ +0.2% |
| 2002 | -0.16x | $-14.28 Million | $87.85 Million | — |