Dawson Geophysical Company (DWSN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Dawson Geophysical Company (DWSN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $2.09 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($40.20 Million) in one year. See DWSN free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Dawson Geophysical Company Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Dawson Geophysical Company across 33 annual periods. Also explore Dawson Geophysical Company annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Dawson Geophysical Company (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Dawson Geophysical Company. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see DWSN market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.35x | $13.98 Million | $40.20 Million | ▲ +353.2% |
| 2024 | -0.14x | $-1.87 Million | $13.59 Million | ▼ -551.4% |
| 2023 | 0.03x | $814.00K | $26.76 Million | ▲ +118.5% |
| 2022 | -0.16x | $-3.27 Million | $19.87 Million | ▲ +88.1% |
| 2021 | -1.39x | $-16.05 Million | $11.56 Million | ▼ -187.7% |
| 2020 | 1.58x | $19.64 Million | $12.40 Million | ▲ +308.3% |
| 2019 | 0.39x | $9.48 Million | $24.44 Million | ▲ +1.5% |
| 2018 | 0.38x | $12.87 Million | $33.67 Million | ▲ +236.8% |
| 2017 | -0.28x | $-6.70 Million | $23.99 Million | ▼ -153.6% |
| 2016 | 0.52x | $8.74 Million | $16.78 Million | ▼ -3.8% |
| 2015 | 0.54x | $20.61 Million | $38.07 Million | ▲ +58.1% |
| 2014 | 0.34x | $18.03 Million | $52.62 Million | ▼ -56.5% |
| 2013 | 0.79x | $22.97 Million | $29.17 Million | ▲ +28.4% |
| 2012 | 0.61x | $39.28 Million | $64.04 Million | ▼ -35.1% |
| 2011 | 0.95x | $34.17 Million | $36.16 Million | ▲ +547.1% |
| 2010 | 0.15x | $5.16 Million | $35.34 Million | ▼ -76.4% |
| 2009 | 0.62x | $20.70 Million | $33.52 Million | ▼ -36.8% |
| 2008 | 0.98x | $33.86 Million | $34.66 Million | ▲ +20.1% |
| 2007 | 0.81x | $14.84 Million | $18.24 Million | ▼ -39.4% |
| 2006 | 1.34x | $28.68 Million | $21.36 Million | ▲ +242.6% |
| 2005 | 0.39x | $5.74 Million | $14.64 Million | ▼ -55.3% |
| 2004 | 0.88x | $4.17 Million | $4.75 Million | ▼ -33.0% |
| 2003 | 1.31x | $1.07 Million | $815.61K | ▲ +612.7% |
| 2002 | -0.26x | $-404.10K | $1.58 Million | ▼ -141.6% |
| 2001 | 0.61x | $1.44 Million | $2.34 Million | ▲ +263.8% |
| 2000 | -0.37x | $-383.58K | $1.03 Million | ▼ -443.7% |
| 1999 | 0.11x | $404.42K | $3.72 Million | ▼ -80.1% |
| 1998 | 0.55x | $2.26 Million | $4.14 Million | ▲ +53.9% |
| 1997 | 0.35x | $2.43 Million | $6.84 Million | ▲ +5.0% |
| 1996 | 0.34x | $1.99 Million | $5.89 Million | ▲ +2089.3% |
| 1995 | 0.02x | $172.16K | $11.16 Million | ▼ -87.7% |
| 1994 | 0.13x | $1.30 Million | $10.40 Million | ▲ +937.5% |
| 1993 | -0.01x | $-100.00K | $6.70 Million | — |