Dawson Geophysical Company Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Dawson Geophysical Company cash flow-to-debt ratio. Dawson Geophysical Company (DWSN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-465.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($41.07 Million) in one year. Check Dawson Geophysical Company earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Dawson Geophysical Company (1993–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Dawson Geophysical Company from 1993 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Dawson Geophysical Company across 33 annual periods. Check Dawson Geophysical Company total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Dawson Geophysical Company Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1993–2025)
Dawson Geophysical Company cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1993 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Dawson Geophysical Company. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Dawson Geophysical Company.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.35x | $13.98 Million | $40.20 Million | ▲ +353.2% |
| 2024 | -0.14x | $-1.87 Million | $13.59 Million | ▼ -551.4% |
| 2023 | 0.03x | $814.00K | $26.76 Million | ▲ +118.5% |
| 2022 | -0.16x | $-3.27 Million | $19.87 Million | ▲ +88.1% |
| 2021 | -1.39x | $-16.05 Million | $11.56 Million | ▼ -187.7% |
| 2020 | 1.58x | $19.64 Million | $12.40 Million | ▲ +308.3% |
| 2019 | 0.39x | $9.48 Million | $24.44 Million | ▲ +1.5% |
| 2018 | 0.38x | $12.87 Million | $33.67 Million | ▲ +236.8% |
| 2017 | -0.28x | $-6.70 Million | $23.99 Million | ▼ -153.6% |
| 2016 | 0.52x | $8.74 Million | $16.78 Million | ▼ -3.8% |
| 2015 | 0.54x | $20.61 Million | $38.07 Million | ▲ +58.1% |
| 2014 | 0.34x | $18.03 Million | $52.62 Million | ▼ -56.5% |
| 2013 | 0.79x | $22.97 Million | $29.17 Million | ▲ +28.4% |
| 2012 | 0.61x | $39.28 Million | $64.04 Million | ▼ -35.1% |
| 2011 | 0.95x | $34.17 Million | $36.16 Million | ▲ +547.1% |
| 2010 | 0.15x | $5.16 Million | $35.34 Million | ▼ -76.4% |
| 2009 | 0.62x | $20.70 Million | $33.52 Million | ▼ -36.8% |
| 2008 | 0.98x | $33.86 Million | $34.66 Million | ▲ +20.1% |
| 2007 | 0.81x | $14.84 Million | $18.24 Million | ▼ -39.4% |
| 2006 | 1.34x | $28.68 Million | $21.36 Million | ▲ +242.6% |
| 2005 | 0.39x | $5.74 Million | $14.64 Million | ▼ -55.3% |
| 2004 | 0.88x | $4.17 Million | $4.75 Million | ▼ -33.0% |
| 2003 | 1.31x | $1.07 Million | $815.61K | ▲ +612.7% |
| 2002 | -0.26x | $-404.10K | $1.58 Million | ▼ -141.6% |
| 2001 | 0.61x | $1.44 Million | $2.34 Million | ▲ +263.8% |
| 2000 | -0.37x | $-383.58K | $1.03 Million | ▼ -443.7% |
| 1999 | 0.11x | $404.42K | $3.72 Million | ▼ -80.1% |
| 1998 | 0.55x | $2.26 Million | $4.14 Million | ▲ +53.9% |
| 1997 | 0.35x | $2.43 Million | $6.84 Million | ▲ +5.0% |
| 1996 | 0.34x | $1.99 Million | $5.89 Million | ▲ +2089.3% |
| 1995 | 0.02x | $172.16K | $11.16 Million | ▼ -87.7% |
| 1994 | 0.13x | $1.30 Million | $10.40 Million | ▲ +937.5% |
| 1993 | -0.01x | $-100.00K | $6.70 Million | — |