Dawson Geophysical Company (DWSN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Dawson Geophysical Company (DWSN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-465.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($41.07 Million) in one year. Explore DWSN long-term asset investment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Dawson Geophysical Company Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Dawson Geophysical Company across 33 annual periods. Also explore Dawson Geophysical Company balance sheet assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Dawson Geophysical Company (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Dawson Geophysical Company. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see DWSN market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.35x | $13.98 Million | $40.20 Million | ▲ +353.2% |
| 2024 | -0.14x | $-1.87 Million | $13.59 Million | ▼ -551.4% |
| 2023 | 0.03x | $814.00K | $26.76 Million | ▲ +118.5% |
| 2022 | -0.16x | $-3.27 Million | $19.87 Million | ▲ +88.1% |
| 2021 | -1.39x | $-16.05 Million | $11.56 Million | ▼ -187.7% |
| 2020 | 1.58x | $19.64 Million | $12.40 Million | ▲ +308.3% |
| 2019 | 0.39x | $9.48 Million | $24.44 Million | ▲ +1.5% |
| 2018 | 0.38x | $12.87 Million | $33.67 Million | ▲ +236.8% |
| 2017 | -0.28x | $-6.70 Million | $23.99 Million | ▼ -153.6% |
| 2016 | 0.52x | $8.74 Million | $16.78 Million | ▼ -3.8% |
| 2015 | 0.54x | $20.61 Million | $38.07 Million | ▲ +58.1% |
| 2014 | 0.34x | $18.03 Million | $52.62 Million | ▼ -56.5% |
| 2013 | 0.79x | $22.97 Million | $29.17 Million | ▲ +28.4% |
| 2012 | 0.61x | $39.28 Million | $64.04 Million | ▼ -35.1% |
| 2011 | 0.95x | $34.17 Million | $36.16 Million | ▲ +547.1% |
| 2010 | 0.15x | $5.16 Million | $35.34 Million | ▼ -76.4% |
| 2009 | 0.62x | $20.70 Million | $33.52 Million | ▼ -36.8% |
| 2008 | 0.98x | $33.86 Million | $34.66 Million | ▲ +20.1% |
| 2007 | 0.81x | $14.84 Million | $18.24 Million | ▼ -39.4% |
| 2006 | 1.34x | $28.68 Million | $21.36 Million | ▲ +242.6% |
| 2005 | 0.39x | $5.74 Million | $14.64 Million | ▼ -55.3% |
| 2004 | 0.88x | $4.17 Million | $4.75 Million | ▼ -33.0% |
| 2003 | 1.31x | $1.07 Million | $815.61K | ▲ +612.7% |
| 2002 | -0.26x | $-404.10K | $1.58 Million | ▼ -141.6% |
| 2001 | 0.61x | $1.44 Million | $2.34 Million | ▲ +263.8% |
| 2000 | -0.37x | $-383.58K | $1.03 Million | ▼ -443.7% |
| 1999 | 0.11x | $404.42K | $3.72 Million | ▼ -80.1% |
| 1998 | 0.55x | $2.26 Million | $4.14 Million | ▲ +53.9% |
| 1997 | 0.35x | $2.43 Million | $6.84 Million | ▲ +5.0% |
| 1996 | 0.34x | $1.99 Million | $5.89 Million | ▲ +2089.3% |
| 1995 | 0.02x | $172.16K | $11.16 Million | ▼ -87.7% |
| 1994 | 0.13x | $1.30 Million | $10.40 Million | ▲ +937.5% |
| 1993 | -0.01x | $-100.00K | $6.70 Million | — |