Dawson Geophysical Company (DWSN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Dawson Geophysical Company (DWSN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-465.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($41.07 Million) in one year. See Dawson Geophysical Company financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Dawson Geophysical Company Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Dawson Geophysical Company across 33 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Dawson Geophysical Company operating cash flow efficiency.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Dawson Geophysical Company (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Dawson Geophysical Company. Check Dawson Geophysical Company (DWSN) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.35x | $13.98 Million | $40.20 Million | ▲ +353.2% |
| 2024 | -0.14x | $-1.87 Million | $13.59 Million | ▼ -551.4% |
| 2023 | 0.03x | $814.00K | $26.76 Million | ▲ +118.5% |
| 2022 | -0.16x | $-3.27 Million | $19.87 Million | ▲ +88.1% |
| 2021 | -1.39x | $-16.05 Million | $11.56 Million | ▼ -187.7% |
| 2020 | 1.58x | $19.64 Million | $12.40 Million | ▲ +308.3% |
| 2019 | 0.39x | $9.48 Million | $24.44 Million | ▲ +1.5% |
| 2018 | 0.38x | $12.87 Million | $33.67 Million | ▲ +236.8% |
| 2017 | -0.28x | $-6.70 Million | $23.99 Million | ▼ -153.6% |
| 2016 | 0.52x | $8.74 Million | $16.78 Million | ▼ -3.8% |
| 2015 | 0.54x | $20.61 Million | $38.07 Million | ▲ +58.1% |
| 2014 | 0.34x | $18.03 Million | $52.62 Million | ▼ -56.5% |
| 2013 | 0.79x | $22.97 Million | $29.17 Million | ▲ +28.4% |
| 2012 | 0.61x | $39.28 Million | $64.04 Million | ▼ -35.1% |
| 2011 | 0.95x | $34.17 Million | $36.16 Million | ▲ +547.1% |
| 2010 | 0.15x | $5.16 Million | $35.34 Million | ▼ -76.4% |
| 2009 | 0.62x | $20.70 Million | $33.52 Million | ▼ -36.8% |
| 2008 | 0.98x | $33.86 Million | $34.66 Million | ▲ +20.1% |
| 2007 | 0.81x | $14.84 Million | $18.24 Million | ▼ -39.4% |
| 2006 | 1.34x | $28.68 Million | $21.36 Million | ▲ +242.6% |
| 2005 | 0.39x | $5.74 Million | $14.64 Million | ▼ -55.3% |
| 2004 | 0.88x | $4.17 Million | $4.75 Million | ▼ -33.0% |
| 2003 | 1.31x | $1.07 Million | $815.61K | ▲ +612.7% |
| 2002 | -0.26x | $-404.10K | $1.58 Million | ▼ -141.6% |
| 2001 | 0.61x | $1.44 Million | $2.34 Million | ▲ +263.8% |
| 2000 | -0.37x | $-383.58K | $1.03 Million | ▼ -443.7% |
| 1999 | 0.11x | $404.42K | $3.72 Million | ▼ -80.1% |
| 1998 | 0.55x | $2.26 Million | $4.14 Million | ▲ +53.9% |
| 1997 | 0.35x | $2.43 Million | $6.84 Million | ▲ +5.0% |
| 1996 | 0.34x | $1.99 Million | $5.89 Million | ▲ +2089.3% |
| 1995 | 0.02x | $172.16K | $11.16 Million | ▼ -87.7% |
| 1994 | 0.13x | $1.30 Million | $10.40 Million | ▲ +937.5% |
| 1993 | -0.01x | $-100.00K | $6.70 Million | — |