Electro-Sensors Inc (ELSE) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Electro-Sensors Inc (ELSE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $20.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($885.00K) in one year. See ELSE free cash flow to operating cash ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Electro-Sensors Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Electro-Sensors Inc across 35 annual periods. Also explore Electro-Sensors Inc net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Electro-Sensors Inc (1991–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Electro-Sensors Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Electro-Sensors Inc market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.75x | $662.00K | $885.00K | ▲ +238.1% |
| 2024 | 0.22x | $129.00K | $583.00K | ▲ +22.0% |
| 2023 | 0.18x | $130.00K | $717.00K | ▲ +181.4% |
| 2022 | -0.22x | $-147.00K | $660.00K | ▼ -121.0% |
| 2021 | 1.06x | $769.00K | $726.00K | ▲ +81.8% |
| 2020 | 0.58x | $331.00K | $568.00K | ▲ +132.3% |
| 2019 | 0.25x | $152.00K | $606.00K | ▲ +6.1% |
| 2018 | 0.24x | $130.00K | $550.00K | ▼ -64.2% |
| 2017 | 0.66x | $468.00K | $708.00K | ▲ +148.9% |
| 2016 | 0.27x | $196.00K | $738.00K | ▲ +219.9% |
| 2015 | -0.22x | $-306.00K | $1.38 Million | ▼ -288.2% |
| 2014 | 0.12x | $263.00K | $2.23 Million | ▲ +24.8% |
| 2013 | 0.09x | $127.00K | $1.35 Million | ▼ -73.1% |
| 2012 | 0.35x | $732.00K | $2.09 Million | ▲ +75.7% |
| 2011 | 0.20x | $309.00K | $1.55 Million | ▼ -54.2% |
| 2010 | 0.44x | $618.00K | $1.42 Million | ▼ -24.9% |
| 2009 | 0.58x | $707.00K | $1.22 Million | ▲ +61.7% |
| 2008 | 0.36x | $278.00K | $775.00K | ▼ -28.2% |
| 2007 | 0.50x | $1.09 Million | $2.18 Million | ▲ +662.5% |
| 2006 | 0.07x | $178.00K | $2.72 Million | ▲ +226.1% |
| 2005 | -0.05x | $-143.00K | $2.75 Million | ▲ +42.0% |
| 2004 | -0.09x | $-278.00K | $3.10 Million | ▼ -73.8% |
| 2003 | -0.05x | $-275.15K | $5.33 Million | ▲ +95.7% |
| 2002 | -1.19x | $-2.38 Million | $2.00 Million | ▼ -31577.4% |
| 2001 | 0.00x | $-21.61K | $5.77 Million | ▲ +72.1% |
| 2000 | -0.01x | $-97.78K | $7.28 Million | ▼ -102.5% |
| 1999 | 0.55x | $512.41K | $938.62K | ▲ +82.0% |
| 1998 | 0.30x | $300.00K | $1.00 Million | ▲ +80.0% |
| 1997 | 0.17x | $300.00K | $1.80 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1996 | 0.17x | $400.00K | $2.40 Million | ▼ -11.9% |
| 1995 | 0.19x | $700.00K | $3.70 Million | ▼ -43.2% |
| 1994 | 0.33x | $400.00K | $1.20 Million | ▼ -50.0% |
| 1993 | 0.67x | $200.00K | $300.00K | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1992 | 0.67x | $200.00K | $300.00K | ▼ -69.7% |
| 1991 | 2.20x | $1.10 Million | $500.00K | — |