Electrovaya Inc. (ELVA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Electrovaya Inc. (ELVA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.71 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($39.62 Million) in one year. See Electrovaya Inc. (ELVA) FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Electrovaya Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Electrovaya Inc. across 29 annual periods. Also explore net asset momentum of Electrovaya Inc. to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Electrovaya Inc. (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Electrovaya Inc.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see ELVA company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.05x | $1.72 Million | $32.80 Million | ▲ +55.8% |
| 2024 | 0.03x | $1.04 Million | $30.90 Million | ▲ +118.8% |
| 2023 | -0.18x | $-5.24 Million | $29.37 Million | ▲ +41.6% |
| 2022 | -0.31x | $-8.82 Million | $28.90 Million | ▲ +37.3% |
| 2021 | -0.49x | $-8.12 Million | $16.67 Million | ▼ -141.7% |
| 2020 | -0.20x | $-3.90 Million | $19.36 Million | ▼ -14.5% |
| 2019 | -0.18x | $-2.88 Million | $16.35 Million | ▲ +25.7% |
| 2018 | -0.24x | $-7.00 Million | $29.59 Million | ▲ +54.7% |
| 2017 | -0.52x | $-19.18 Million | $36.76 Million | ▼ -47.6% |
| 2016 | -0.35x | $-8.09 Million | $22.88 Million | ▼ -1265.9% |
| 2015 | 0.03x | $449.00K | $14.81 Million | ▲ +104.3% |
| 2014 | -0.70x | $-5.01 Million | $7.17 Million | ▼ -422.5% |
| 2013 | -0.13x | $-1.44 Million | $10.75 Million | ▼ -119.8% |
| 2012 | -0.06x | $-714.00K | $11.74 Million | ▲ +79.0% |
| 2011 | -0.29x | $-2.42 Million | $8.36 Million | ▲ +71.6% |
| 2010 | -1.02x | $-2.71 Million | $2.66 Million | ▼ -356.4% |
| 2009 | 0.40x | $1.28 Million | $3.23 Million | ▲ +158.3% |
| 2008 | -0.68x | $-1.71 Million | $2.51 Million | ▲ +67.9% |
| 2007 | -2.12x | $-3.74 Million | $1.76 Million | ▲ +1.2% |
| 2006 | -2.15x | $-3.35 Million | $1.56 Million | ▼ -14.5% |
| 2005 | -1.88x | $-3.01 Million | $1.60 Million | ▲ +42.7% |
| 2004 | -3.28x | $-4.96 Million | $1.51 Million | ▲ +9.7% |
| 2003 | -3.63x | $-6.40 Million | $1.77 Million | ▲ +49.8% |
| 2002 | -7.22x | $-9.12 Million | $1.26 Million | ▼ -0.1% |
| 2001 | -7.21x | $-8.27 Million | $1.15 Million | ▼ -3109.5% |
| 2000 | -0.22x | $-411.87K | $1.83 Million | ▲ +95.3% |
| 1999 | -4.75x | $-1.03 Million | $216.71K | ▼ -6.6% |
| 1998 | -4.46x | $-855.66K | $191.84K | ▲ +9.7% |
| 1997 | -4.94x | $-1.11 Million | $224.26K | — |