EXACT Sciences Corporation (EXAS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
EXACT Sciences Corporation (EXAS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $151.69 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($3.46 Billion) in one year. See EXAS free cash flow debt coverage to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
EXACT Sciences Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for EXACT Sciences Corporation across 27 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see EXACT Sciences Corporation operating cash flow efficiency.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for EXACT Sciences Corporation (1999–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for EXACT Sciences Corporation. Check EXAS cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.14x | $491.44 Million | $3.46 Billion | ▲ +137.9% |
| 2024 | 0.06x | $210.54 Million | $3.53 Billion | ▲ +27.2% |
| 2023 | 0.05x | $156.12 Million | $3.33 Billion | ▲ +166.8% |
| 2022 | -0.07x | $-223.56 Million | $3.18 Billion | ▼ -126.5% |
| 2021 | -0.03x | $-102.24 Million | $3.30 Billion | ▼ -161.1% |
| 2020 | 0.05x | $136.48 Million | $2.69 Billion | ▲ +155.3% |
| 2019 | -0.09x | $-111.66 Million | $1.22 Billion | ▼ -11.5% |
| 2018 | -0.08x | $-69.33 Million | $843.08 Million | ▲ +91.0% |
| 2017 | -0.92x | $-71.72 Million | $78.14 Million | ▲ +70.5% |
| 2016 | -3.12x | $-130.07 Million | $41.74 Million | ▲ +13.0% |
| 2015 | -3.58x | $-134.02 Million | $37.44 Million | ▼ -0.2% |
| 2014 | -3.57x | $-80.91 Million | $22.64 Million | ▼ -2.9% |
| 2013 | -3.47x | $-39.30 Million | $11.31 Million | ▼ -6.4% |
| 2012 | -3.26x | $-44.16 Million | $13.52 Million | ▼ -57.9% |
| 2011 | -2.07x | $-27.82 Million | $13.46 Million | ▼ -157.1% |
| 2010 | -0.80x | $-13.48 Million | $16.76 Million | ▼ -25.2% |
| 2009 | -0.64x | $-12.64 Million | $19.68 Million | ▲ +32.3% |
| 2008 | -0.95x | $-7.90 Million | $8.33 Million | ▲ +10.1% |
| 2007 | -1.06x | $-8.77 Million | $8.31 Million | ▲ +22.6% |
| 2006 | -1.36x | $-12.15 Million | $8.91 Million | ▼ -12.9% |
| 2005 | -1.21x | $-15.98 Million | $13.22 Million | ▼ -3.5% |
| 2004 | -1.17x | $-21.17 Million | $18.13 Million | ▼ -89.1% |
| 2003 | -0.62x | $-13.87 Million | $22.45 Million | ▲ +39.2% |
| 2002 | -1.02x | $-11.92 Million | $11.74 Million | ▲ +73.5% |
| 2001 | -3.83x | $-15.84 Million | $4.13 Million | ▲ +34.9% |
| 2000 | -5.88x | $-7.99 Million | $1.36 Million | ▲ +56.1% |
| 1999 | -13.40x | $-4.61 Million | $343.89K | — |