EXACT Sciences Corporation (EXAS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
EXACT Sciences Corporation (EXAS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $151.69 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($3.46 Billion) in one year. Explore EXAS long-term investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
EXACT Sciences Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for EXACT Sciences Corporation across 27 annual periods. Also explore total assets of EXACT Sciences Corporation for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for EXACT Sciences Corporation (1999–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for EXACT Sciences Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see EXACT Sciences Corporation (EXAS) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.14x | $491.44 Million | $3.46 Billion | ▲ +137.9% |
| 2024 | 0.06x | $210.54 Million | $3.53 Billion | ▲ +27.2% |
| 2023 | 0.05x | $156.12 Million | $3.33 Billion | ▲ +166.8% |
| 2022 | -0.07x | $-223.56 Million | $3.18 Billion | ▼ -126.5% |
| 2021 | -0.03x | $-102.24 Million | $3.30 Billion | ▼ -161.1% |
| 2020 | 0.05x | $136.48 Million | $2.69 Billion | ▲ +155.3% |
| 2019 | -0.09x | $-111.66 Million | $1.22 Billion | ▼ -11.5% |
| 2018 | -0.08x | $-69.33 Million | $843.08 Million | ▲ +91.0% |
| 2017 | -0.92x | $-71.72 Million | $78.14 Million | ▲ +70.5% |
| 2016 | -3.12x | $-130.07 Million | $41.74 Million | ▲ +13.0% |
| 2015 | -3.58x | $-134.02 Million | $37.44 Million | ▼ -0.2% |
| 2014 | -3.57x | $-80.91 Million | $22.64 Million | ▼ -2.9% |
| 2013 | -3.47x | $-39.30 Million | $11.31 Million | ▼ -6.4% |
| 2012 | -3.26x | $-44.16 Million | $13.52 Million | ▼ -57.9% |
| 2011 | -2.07x | $-27.82 Million | $13.46 Million | ▼ -157.1% |
| 2010 | -0.80x | $-13.48 Million | $16.76 Million | ▼ -25.2% |
| 2009 | -0.64x | $-12.64 Million | $19.68 Million | ▲ +32.3% |
| 2008 | -0.95x | $-7.90 Million | $8.33 Million | ▲ +10.1% |
| 2007 | -1.06x | $-8.77 Million | $8.31 Million | ▲ +22.6% |
| 2006 | -1.36x | $-12.15 Million | $8.91 Million | ▼ -12.9% |
| 2005 | -1.21x | $-15.98 Million | $13.22 Million | ▼ -3.5% |
| 2004 | -1.17x | $-21.17 Million | $18.13 Million | ▼ -89.1% |
| 2003 | -0.62x | $-13.87 Million | $22.45 Million | ▲ +39.2% |
| 2002 | -1.02x | $-11.92 Million | $11.74 Million | ▲ +73.5% |
| 2001 | -3.83x | $-15.84 Million | $4.13 Million | ▲ +34.9% |
| 2000 | -5.88x | $-7.99 Million | $1.36 Million | ▲ +56.1% |
| 1999 | -13.40x | $-4.61 Million | $343.89K | — |