EXACT Sciences Corporation (EXAS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
EXACT Sciences Corporation (EXAS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $151.69 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($3.46 Billion) in one year. See EXACT Sciences Corporation free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
EXACT Sciences Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for EXACT Sciences Corporation across 27 annual periods. Also explore how fast is EXACT Sciences Corporation growing its equity to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for EXACT Sciences Corporation (1999–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for EXACT Sciences Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see EXACT Sciences Corporation (EXAS) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.14x | $491.44 Million | $3.46 Billion | ▲ +137.9% |
| 2024 | 0.06x | $210.54 Million | $3.53 Billion | ▲ +27.2% |
| 2023 | 0.05x | $156.12 Million | $3.33 Billion | ▲ +166.8% |
| 2022 | -0.07x | $-223.56 Million | $3.18 Billion | ▼ -126.5% |
| 2021 | -0.03x | $-102.24 Million | $3.30 Billion | ▼ -161.1% |
| 2020 | 0.05x | $136.48 Million | $2.69 Billion | ▲ +155.3% |
| 2019 | -0.09x | $-111.66 Million | $1.22 Billion | ▼ -11.5% |
| 2018 | -0.08x | $-69.33 Million | $843.08 Million | ▲ +91.0% |
| 2017 | -0.92x | $-71.72 Million | $78.14 Million | ▲ +70.5% |
| 2016 | -3.12x | $-130.07 Million | $41.74 Million | ▲ +13.0% |
| 2015 | -3.58x | $-134.02 Million | $37.44 Million | ▼ -0.2% |
| 2014 | -3.57x | $-80.91 Million | $22.64 Million | ▼ -2.9% |
| 2013 | -3.47x | $-39.30 Million | $11.31 Million | ▼ -6.4% |
| 2012 | -3.26x | $-44.16 Million | $13.52 Million | ▼ -57.9% |
| 2011 | -2.07x | $-27.82 Million | $13.46 Million | ▼ -157.1% |
| 2010 | -0.80x | $-13.48 Million | $16.76 Million | ▼ -25.2% |
| 2009 | -0.64x | $-12.64 Million | $19.68 Million | ▲ +32.3% |
| 2008 | -0.95x | $-7.90 Million | $8.33 Million | ▲ +10.1% |
| 2007 | -1.06x | $-8.77 Million | $8.31 Million | ▲ +22.6% |
| 2006 | -1.36x | $-12.15 Million | $8.91 Million | ▼ -12.9% |
| 2005 | -1.21x | $-15.98 Million | $13.22 Million | ▼ -3.5% |
| 2004 | -1.17x | $-21.17 Million | $18.13 Million | ▼ -89.1% |
| 2003 | -0.62x | $-13.87 Million | $22.45 Million | ▲ +39.2% |
| 2002 | -1.02x | $-11.92 Million | $11.74 Million | ▲ +73.5% |
| 2001 | -3.83x | $-15.84 Million | $4.13 Million | ▲ +34.9% |
| 2000 | -5.88x | $-7.99 Million | $1.36 Million | ▲ +56.1% |
| 1999 | -13.40x | $-4.61 Million | $343.89K | — |