FARO Technologies Inc (FARO) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
FARO Technologies Inc (FARO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of March 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $5.03 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($234.86 Million) in one year. Explore how much of FARO Technologies Inc's assets are long-term investments to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
FARO Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for FARO Technologies Inc across 29 annual periods. Also explore FARO total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for FARO Technologies Inc (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for FARO Technologies Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of FARO Technologies Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.13x | $30.63 Million | $233.40 Million | ▲ +2782.1% |
| 2023 | 0.00x | $1.07 Million | $236.09 Million | ▲ +103.0% |
| 2022 | -0.15x | $-24.86 Million | $162.30 Million | ▼ -74.2% |
| 2021 | -0.09x | $-13.48 Million | $153.28 Million | ▼ -167.9% |
| 2020 | 0.13x | $21.39 Million | $165.29 Million | ▼ -38.3% |
| 2019 | 0.21x | $32.47 Million | $154.85 Million | ▲ +293.8% |
| 2018 | 0.05x | $6.90 Million | $129.63 Million | ▼ -45.2% |
| 2017 | 0.10x | $10.36 Million | $106.51 Million | ▼ -78.3% |
| 2016 | 0.45x | $37.58 Million | $84.06 Million | ▲ +30.1% |
| 2015 | 0.34x | $28.03 Million | $81.54 Million | ▲ +395.8% |
| 2014 | 0.07x | $5.66 Million | $81.61 Million | ▼ -84.7% |
| 2013 | 0.45x | $34.28 Million | $75.55 Million | ▲ +10.8% |
| 2012 | 0.41x | $27.87 Million | $68.07 Million | ▲ +205.8% |
| 2011 | 0.13x | $8.69 Million | $64.89 Million | ▼ -52.1% |
| 2010 | 0.28x | $14.98 Million | $53.54 Million | ▲ +22.1% |
| 2009 | 0.23x | $8.96 Million | $39.11 Million | ▼ -18.8% |
| 2008 | 0.28x | $13.27 Million | $47.01 Million | ▼ -35.9% |
| 2007 | 0.44x | $21.59 Million | $49.04 Million | ▲ +50.0% |
| 2006 | 0.29x | $9.75 Million | $33.22 Million | ▲ +305.2% |
| 2005 | -0.14x | $-3.40 Million | $23.79 Million | ▼ -131.2% |
| 2004 | 0.46x | $7.29 Million | $15.92 Million | ▲ +27.5% |
| 2003 | 0.36x | $4.67 Million | $12.99 Million | ▲ +184.9% |
| 2002 | -0.42x | $-5.00 Million | $11.81 Million | ▼ -267.4% |
| 2001 | -0.12x | $-842.49K | $7.32 Million | ▼ -121.3% |
| 2000 | 0.54x | $4.72 Million | $8.74 Million | ▲ +98.5% |
| 1999 | 0.27x | $1.50 Million | $5.50 Million | ▲ +132.5% |
| 1998 | -0.84x | $-3.10 Million | $3.70 Million | ▼ -140.9% |
| 1997 | -0.35x | $-800.00K | $2.30 Million | ▼ -192.8% |
| 1996 | 0.38x | $1.50 Million | $4.00 Million | — |