FARO Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
FARO Technologies Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. FARO Technologies Inc (FARO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of March 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $5.03 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($234.86 Million) in one year. Check FARO operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of FARO Technologies Inc (1996–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of FARO Technologies Inc from 1996 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for FARO Technologies Inc across 29 annual periods. Check FARO Technologies Inc (FARO) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
FARO Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2024)
FARO Technologies Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for FARO Technologies Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see FARO Technologies Inc (FARO) cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.13x | $30.63 Million | $233.40 Million | ▲ +2782.1% |
| 2023 | 0.00x | $1.07 Million | $236.09 Million | ▲ +103.0% |
| 2022 | -0.15x | $-24.86 Million | $162.30 Million | ▼ -74.2% |
| 2021 | -0.09x | $-13.48 Million | $153.28 Million | ▼ -167.9% |
| 2020 | 0.13x | $21.39 Million | $165.29 Million | ▼ -38.3% |
| 2019 | 0.21x | $32.47 Million | $154.85 Million | ▲ +293.8% |
| 2018 | 0.05x | $6.90 Million | $129.63 Million | ▼ -45.2% |
| 2017 | 0.10x | $10.36 Million | $106.51 Million | ▼ -78.3% |
| 2016 | 0.45x | $37.58 Million | $84.06 Million | ▲ +30.1% |
| 2015 | 0.34x | $28.03 Million | $81.54 Million | ▲ +395.8% |
| 2014 | 0.07x | $5.66 Million | $81.61 Million | ▼ -84.7% |
| 2013 | 0.45x | $34.28 Million | $75.55 Million | ▲ +10.8% |
| 2012 | 0.41x | $27.87 Million | $68.07 Million | ▲ +205.8% |
| 2011 | 0.13x | $8.69 Million | $64.89 Million | ▼ -52.1% |
| 2010 | 0.28x | $14.98 Million | $53.54 Million | ▲ +22.1% |
| 2009 | 0.23x | $8.96 Million | $39.11 Million | ▼ -18.8% |
| 2008 | 0.28x | $13.27 Million | $47.01 Million | ▼ -35.9% |
| 2007 | 0.44x | $21.59 Million | $49.04 Million | ▲ +50.0% |
| 2006 | 0.29x | $9.75 Million | $33.22 Million | ▲ +305.2% |
| 2005 | -0.14x | $-3.40 Million | $23.79 Million | ▼ -131.2% |
| 2004 | 0.46x | $7.29 Million | $15.92 Million | ▲ +27.5% |
| 2003 | 0.36x | $4.67 Million | $12.99 Million | ▲ +184.9% |
| 2002 | -0.42x | $-5.00 Million | $11.81 Million | ▼ -267.4% |
| 2001 | -0.12x | $-842.49K | $7.32 Million | ▼ -121.3% |
| 2000 | 0.54x | $4.72 Million | $8.74 Million | ▲ +98.5% |
| 1999 | 0.27x | $1.50 Million | $5.50 Million | ▲ +132.5% |
| 1998 | -0.84x | $-3.10 Million | $3.70 Million | ▼ -140.9% |
| 1997 | -0.35x | $-800.00K | $2.30 Million | ▼ -192.8% |
| 1996 | 0.38x | $1.50 Million | $4.00 Million | — |