Fonar Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Fonar Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Fonar Corporation (FONR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $130.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($54.36 Million) in one year. Check Fonar Corporation (FONR) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Fonar Corporation (1988–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Fonar Corporation from 1988 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Fonar Corporation across 38 annual periods. Check FONR capex plus investments ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Fonar Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1988–2025)
Fonar Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1988 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Fonar Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see FONR cash flow metrics.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.20x | $11.26 Million | $56.80 Million | ▼ -19.1% |
| 2024 | 0.25x | $14.09 Million | $57.46 Million | ▼ -15.6% |
| 2023 | 0.29x | $14.47 Million | $49.75 Million | ▲ +0.9% |
| 2022 | 0.29x | $15.30 Million | $53.11 Million | ▼ -18.3% |
| 2021 | 0.35x | $19.09 Million | $54.14 Million | ▼ -6.6% |
| 2020 | 0.38x | $20.40 Million | $54.02 Million | ▼ -70.0% |
| 2019 | 1.26x | $19.45 Million | $15.45 Million | ▲ +8.0% |
| 2018 | 1.17x | $18.74 Million | $16.08 Million | ▲ +9.9% |
| 2017 | 1.06x | $16.81 Million | $15.85 Million | ▲ +53.8% |
| 2016 | 0.69x | $16.62 Million | $24.11 Million | ▲ +33.5% |
| 2015 | 0.52x | $13.27 Million | $25.71 Million | ▲ +19.3% |
| 2014 | 0.43x | $13.36 Million | $30.88 Million | ▲ +102.9% |
| 2013 | 0.21x | $7.54 Million | $35.35 Million | ▼ -35.2% |
| 2012 | 0.33x | $7.42 Million | $22.53 Million | ▲ +168.8% |
| 2011 | 0.12x | $3.15 Million | $25.71 Million | ▲ +324.0% |
| 2010 | -0.05x | $-1.50 Million | $27.40 Million | ▲ +71.8% |
| 2009 | -0.19x | $-6.07 Million | $31.24 Million | ▼ -63.7% |
| 2008 | -0.12x | $-4.66 Million | $39.30 Million | ▲ +4.3% |
| 2007 | -0.12x | $-3.94 Million | $31.78 Million | ▼ -26.4% |
| 2006 | -0.10x | $-2.56 Million | $26.11 Million | ▼ -124.2% |
| 2005 | -0.04x | $-1.04 Million | $23.70 Million | ▼ -122.7% |
| 2004 | 0.19x | $6.50 Million | $33.67 Million | ▲ +47.2% |
| 2003 | 0.13x | $3.41 Million | $26.02 Million | ▲ +674.7% |
| 2002 | 0.02x | $623.92K | $36.86 Million | ▼ -44.5% |
| 2001 | 0.03x | $1.32 Million | $43.17 Million | ▲ +121.4% |
| 2000 | -0.14x | $-4.74 Million | $33.29 Million | ▲ +56.1% |
| 1999 | -0.32x | $-12.40 Million | $38.30 Million | ▼ -116.8% |
| 1998 | 1.92x | $68.60 Million | $35.70 Million | ▲ +1829.4% |
| 1997 | -0.11x | $-3.70 Million | $33.30 Million | ▲ +78.2% |
| 1996 | -0.51x | $-7.60 Million | $14.90 Million | ▼ -187.1% |
| 1995 | -0.18x | $-2.70 Million | $15.20 Million | ▲ +13.4% |
| 1994 | -0.21x | $-4.00 Million | $19.50 Million | ▼ -463.4% |
| 1993 | 0.06x | $1.40 Million | $24.80 Million | ▼ -75.4% |
| 1992 | 0.23x | $6.30 Million | $27.50 Million | ▲ +18.0% |
| 1991 | 0.19x | $5.90 Million | $30.40 Million | ▲ +5.6% |
| 1990 | 0.18x | $6.56 Million | $35.70 Million | ▲ +193.4% |
| 1989 | -0.20x | $-8.99 Million | $45.70 Million | ▼ -170.5% |
| 1988 | 0.28x | $8.84 Million | $31.70 Million | — |