Formula Systems 1985 Ltd ADR Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Formula Systems 1985 Ltd ADR cash flow-to-debt ratio. Formula Systems 1985 Ltd ADR (FORTY) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2023, meaning its operating cash flow of $14.95 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.58 Billion) in one year. Check earnings quality score of Formula Systems 1985 Ltd ADR to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Formula Systems 1985 Ltd ADR (1998–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Formula Systems 1985 Ltd ADR from 1998 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Formula Systems 1985 Ltd ADR across 27 annual periods. Check Formula Systems 1985 Ltd ADR total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Formula Systems 1985 Ltd ADR Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1998–2024)
Formula Systems 1985 Ltd ADR cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1998 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Formula Systems 1985 Ltd ADR. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see FORTY cash generation efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.20x | $324.45 Million | $1.63 Billion | ▲ +1.8% |
| 2023 | 0.20x | $294.97 Million | $1.50 Billion | ▲ +32.6% |
| 2022 | 0.15x | $239.14 Million | $1.62 Billion | ▲ +11.2% |
| 2021 | 0.13x | $208.48 Million | $1.57 Billion | ▼ -34.5% |
| 2020 | 0.20x | $286.94 Million | $1.41 Billion | ▲ +23.5% |
| 2019 | 0.16x | $196.08 Million | $1.19 Billion | ▲ +71.1% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | $82.59 Million | $859.33 Million | ▼ -6.5% |
| 2017 | 0.10x | $80.98 Million | $788.10 Million | ▼ -13.0% |
| 2016 | 0.12x | $74.95 Million | $634.82 Million | ▲ +18.7% |
| 2015 | 0.10x | $54.40 Million | $546.74 Million | ▲ +178.9% |
| 2014 | 0.04x | $16.67 Million | $467.32 Million | ▼ -79.4% |
| 2013 | 0.17x | $68.55 Million | $395.64 Million | ▼ -2.2% |
| 2012 | 0.18x | $73.07 Million | $412.54 Million | ▲ +109.5% |
| 2011 | 0.08x | $25.83 Million | $305.54 Million | ▼ -54.2% |
| 2010 | 0.18x | $53.37 Million | $289.38 Million | ▼ -10.1% |
| 2009 | 0.21x | $55.64 Million | $271.12 Million | ▲ +38.3% |
| 2008 | 0.15x | $47.38 Million | $319.25 Million | ▲ +5.1% |
| 2007 | 0.14x | $43.27 Million | $306.32 Million | ▲ +78.0% |
| 2006 | 0.08x | $25.95 Million | $327.07 Million | ▲ +351.8% |
| 2005 | 0.02x | $6.29 Million | $357.96 Million | ▼ -64.7% |
| 2004 | 0.05x | $17.81 Million | $357.66 Million | ▲ +15.3% |
| 2003 | 0.04x | $12.29 Million | $284.66 Million | ▲ +111.3% |
| 2002 | 0.02x | $4.97 Million | $243.12 Million | ▲ +217.6% |
| 2001 | 0.01x | $1.18 Million | $182.72 Million | ▼ -81.7% |
| 2000 | 0.04x | $5.65 Million | $160.75 Million | ▼ -61.1% |
| 1999 | 0.09x | $13.41 Million | $148.33 Million | ▼ -71.4% |
| 1998 | 0.32x | $34.70 Million | $109.60 Million | — |