LB Foster Company Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
LB Foster Company cash flow-to-debt ratio. LB Foster Company (FSTR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.12x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $17.86 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($155.25 Million) in one year. Check LB Foster Company cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of LB Foster Company (1985–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of LB Foster Company from 1985 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for LB Foster Company across 36 annual periods. Check FSTR total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
LB Foster Company Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1985–2025)
LB Foster Company cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1985 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for LB Foster Company. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see FSTR cash generation efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.23x | $35.62 Million | $155.10 Million | ▲ +57.8% |
| 2024 | 0.15x | $22.63 Million | $155.54 Million | ▼ -33.2% |
| 2023 | 0.22x | $36.96 Million | $169.57 Million | ▲ +569.3% |
| 2022 | -0.05x | $-10.58 Million | $227.71 Million | ▼ -594.6% |
| 2021 | -0.01x | $-1.06 Million | $158.99 Million | ▼ -107.6% |
| 2020 | 0.09x | $16.92 Million | $193.56 Million | ▼ -29.8% |
| 2019 | 0.12x | $29.30 Million | $235.31 Million | ▲ +25.2% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | $25.96 Million | $261.13 Million | ▼ -36.8% |
| 2017 | 0.16x | $39.37 Million | $250.08 Million | ▲ +122.2% |
| 2016 | 0.07x | $18.41 Million | $259.77 Million | ▼ -64.2% |
| 2015 | 0.20x | $56.17 Million | $283.83 Million | ▼ -52.8% |
| 2014 | 0.42x | $66.74 Million | $159.23 Million | ▲ +188.0% |
| 2013 | 0.15x | $14.15 Million | $97.26 Million | ▼ -34.8% |
| 2012 | 0.22x | $26.47 Million | $118.55 Million | ▼ -19.9% |
| 2011 | 0.28x | $30.67 Million | $110.08 Million | ▼ -42.4% |
| 2010 | 0.48x | $59.48 Million | $122.97 Million | ▲ +89.0% |
| 2009 | 0.26x | $25.74 Million | $100.58 Million | ▲ +21.7% |
| 2008 | 0.21x | $24.10 Million | $114.56 Million | ▲ +580.1% |
| 2007 | -0.04x | $-5.12 Million | $116.95 Million | ▲ +55.8% |
| 2006 | -0.10x | $-13.65 Million | $137.80 Million | ▼ -170.2% |
| 2005 | -0.04x | $-3.60 Million | $98.30 Million | ▼ -360.2% |
| 2004 | -0.01x | $-481.00K | $60.35 Million | ▼ -105.4% |
| 2003 | 0.15x | $8.94 Million | $60.62 Million | ▼ -45.0% |
| 2002 | 0.27x | $18.21 Million | $67.97 Million | ▲ +0.5% |
| 2001 | 0.27x | $22.10 Million | $82.90 Million | ▲ +4817.2% |
| 2000 | 0.01x | $541.00K | $99.79 Million | ▼ -85.2% |
| 1999 | 0.04x | $3.30 Million | $90.08 Million | ▼ -91.2% |
| 1998 | 0.42x | $19.20 Million | $45.90 Million | ▲ +2526.0% |
| 1997 | 0.02x | $900.00K | $56.50 Million | ▼ -86.8% |
| 1996 | 0.12x | $6.80 Million | $56.20 Million | ▲ +37.1% |
| 1995 | 0.09x | $5.40 Million | $61.20 Million | ▲ +199.5% |
| 1994 | -0.09x | $-5.70 Million | $64.30 Million | ▼ -226.8% |
| 1993 | 0.07x | $3.90 Million | $55.80 Million | ▲ +29.4% |
| 1992 | 0.05x | $2.90 Million | $53.70 Million | ▼ -80.4% |
| 1991 | 0.27x | $14.90 Million | $54.20 Million | ▼ -16.6% |
| 1985 | 0.33x | $41.60 Million | $126.20 Million | — |