Fuel Tech Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Fuel Tech Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Fuel Tech Inc (FTEK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.15x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-894.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($5.83 Million) in one year. Check cash flow quality index of Fuel Tech Inc to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Fuel Tech Inc (1992–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Fuel Tech Inc from 1992 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Fuel Tech Inc across 34 annual periods. Check FTEK cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Fuel Tech Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1992–2025)
Fuel Tech Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1992 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Fuel Tech Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see FTEK cash flow metrics.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.42x | $3.02 Million | $7.25 Million | ▲ +182.9% |
| 2024 | -0.50x | $-3.43 Million | $6.84 Million | ▼ -581.1% |
| 2023 | 0.10x | $696.00K | $6.67 Million | ▲ +113.3% |
| 2022 | -0.78x | $-4.14 Million | $5.28 Million | ▼ -488.5% |
| 2021 | 0.20x | $761.00K | $3.77 Million | ▲ +157.9% |
| 2020 | -0.35x | $-2.71 Million | $7.77 Million | ▲ +42.8% |
| 2019 | -0.61x | $-3.39 Million | $5.56 Million | ▼ -318.6% |
| 2018 | 0.28x | $4.93 Million | $17.67 Million | ▲ +226.2% |
| 2017 | -0.22x | $-3.57 Million | $16.14 Million | ▼ -16.2% |
| 2016 | -0.19x | $-2.74 Million | $14.40 Million | ▼ -146.8% |
| 2015 | 0.41x | $6.93 Million | $17.04 Million | ▲ +43.4% |
| 2014 | 0.28x | $5.43 Million | $19.17 Million | ▲ +113.8% |
| 2013 | 0.13x | $2.84 Million | $21.43 Million | ▼ -66.9% |
| 2012 | 0.40x | $8.67 Million | $21.66 Million | ▲ +97.5% |
| 2011 | 0.20x | $4.86 Million | $23.98 Million | ▼ -67.9% |
| 2010 | 0.63x | $12.19 Million | $19.29 Million | ▼ -34.4% |
| 2009 | 0.96x | $13.53 Million | $14.04 Million | ▲ +80.3% |
| 2008 | 0.53x | $8.05 Million | $15.06 Million | ▲ +212.6% |
| 2007 | 0.17x | $4.10 Million | $23.98 Million | ▼ -62.3% |
| 2006 | 0.45x | $8.16 Million | $18.00 Million | ▼ -45.4% |
| 2005 | 0.83x | $11.53 Million | $13.89 Million | ▲ +466.6% |
| 2004 | 0.15x | $714.00K | $4.87 Million | ▼ -62.1% |
| 2003 | 0.39x | $1.66 Million | $4.29 Million | ▲ +16.9% |
| 2002 | 0.33x | $3.00 Million | $9.06 Million | ▲ +15.6% |
| 2001 | 0.29x | $2.06 Million | $7.19 Million | ▲ +66.5% |
| 2000 | 0.17x | $1.47 Million | $8.52 Million | ▼ -62.8% |
| 1999 | 0.46x | $5.00 Million | $10.80 Million | ▲ +924.1% |
| 1998 | -0.06x | $-500.00K | $8.90 Million | ▲ +96.7% |
| 1997 | -1.71x | $-1.20 Million | $700.00K | ▲ +42.9% |
| 1996 | -3.00x | $-1.50 Million | $500.00K | ▲ +66.7% |
| 1995 | -9.00x | $-3.60 Million | $400.00K | ▼ -200.0% |
| 1994 | -3.00x | $-2.10 Million | $700.00K | ▲ +42.9% |
| 1993 | -5.25x | $-2.10 Million | $400.00K | ▼ -45.8% |
| 1992 | -3.60x | $-1.80 Million | $500.00K | — |