Fuel Tech Inc (FTEK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Fuel Tech Inc (FTEK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.14x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-847.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($5.93 Million) in one year. See Fuel Tech Inc free cash flow ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Fuel Tech Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Fuel Tech Inc across 34 annual periods. Also explore Fuel Tech Inc (FTEK) net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Fuel Tech Inc (1992–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Fuel Tech Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Fuel Tech Inc stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.42x | $3.02 Million | $7.25 Million | ▲ +182.9% |
| 2024 | -0.50x | $-3.43 Million | $6.84 Million | ▼ -581.1% |
| 2023 | 0.10x | $696.00K | $6.67 Million | ▲ +113.3% |
| 2022 | -0.78x | $-4.14 Million | $5.28 Million | ▼ -488.5% |
| 2021 | 0.20x | $761.00K | $3.77 Million | ▲ +157.9% |
| 2020 | -0.35x | $-2.71 Million | $7.77 Million | ▲ +42.8% |
| 2019 | -0.61x | $-3.39 Million | $5.56 Million | ▼ -318.6% |
| 2018 | 0.28x | $4.93 Million | $17.67 Million | ▲ +226.2% |
| 2017 | -0.22x | $-3.57 Million | $16.14 Million | ▼ -16.2% |
| 2016 | -0.19x | $-2.74 Million | $14.40 Million | ▼ -146.8% |
| 2015 | 0.41x | $6.93 Million | $17.04 Million | ▲ +43.4% |
| 2014 | 0.28x | $5.43 Million | $19.17 Million | ▲ +113.8% |
| 2013 | 0.13x | $2.84 Million | $21.43 Million | ▼ -66.9% |
| 2012 | 0.40x | $8.67 Million | $21.66 Million | ▲ +97.5% |
| 2011 | 0.20x | $4.86 Million | $23.98 Million | ▼ -67.9% |
| 2010 | 0.63x | $12.19 Million | $19.29 Million | ▼ -34.4% |
| 2009 | 0.96x | $13.53 Million | $14.04 Million | ▲ +80.3% |
| 2008 | 0.53x | $8.05 Million | $15.06 Million | ▲ +212.6% |
| 2007 | 0.17x | $4.10 Million | $23.98 Million | ▼ -62.3% |
| 2006 | 0.45x | $8.16 Million | $18.00 Million | ▼ -45.4% |
| 2005 | 0.83x | $11.53 Million | $13.89 Million | ▲ +466.6% |
| 2004 | 0.15x | $714.00K | $4.87 Million | ▼ -62.1% |
| 2003 | 0.39x | $1.66 Million | $4.29 Million | ▲ +16.9% |
| 2002 | 0.33x | $3.00 Million | $9.06 Million | ▲ +15.6% |
| 2001 | 0.29x | $2.06 Million | $7.19 Million | ▲ +66.5% |
| 2000 | 0.17x | $1.47 Million | $8.52 Million | ▼ -62.8% |
| 1999 | 0.46x | $5.00 Million | $10.80 Million | ▲ +924.1% |
| 1998 | -0.06x | $-500.00K | $8.90 Million | ▲ +96.7% |
| 1997 | -1.71x | $-1.20 Million | $700.00K | ▲ +42.9% |
| 1996 | -3.00x | $-1.50 Million | $500.00K | ▲ +66.7% |
| 1995 | -9.00x | $-3.60 Million | $400.00K | ▼ -200.0% |
| 1994 | -3.00x | $-2.10 Million | $700.00K | ▲ +42.9% |
| 1993 | -5.25x | $-2.10 Million | $400.00K | ▼ -45.8% |
| 1992 | -3.60x | $-1.80 Million | $500.00K | — |