Fuel Tech Inc (FTEK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Fuel Tech Inc (FTEK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.14x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-847.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($5.93 Million) in one year. Explore how much of Fuel Tech Inc's assets are long-term investments to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Fuel Tech Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Fuel Tech Inc across 34 annual periods. Also explore balance sheet size of Fuel Tech Inc for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Fuel Tech Inc (1992–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Fuel Tech Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Fuel Tech Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.42x | $3.02 Million | $7.25 Million | ▲ +182.9% |
| 2024 | -0.50x | $-3.43 Million | $6.84 Million | ▼ -581.1% |
| 2023 | 0.10x | $696.00K | $6.67 Million | ▲ +113.3% |
| 2022 | -0.78x | $-4.14 Million | $5.28 Million | ▼ -488.5% |
| 2021 | 0.20x | $761.00K | $3.77 Million | ▲ +157.9% |
| 2020 | -0.35x | $-2.71 Million | $7.77 Million | ▲ +42.8% |
| 2019 | -0.61x | $-3.39 Million | $5.56 Million | ▼ -318.6% |
| 2018 | 0.28x | $4.93 Million | $17.67 Million | ▲ +226.2% |
| 2017 | -0.22x | $-3.57 Million | $16.14 Million | ▼ -16.2% |
| 2016 | -0.19x | $-2.74 Million | $14.40 Million | ▼ -146.8% |
| 2015 | 0.41x | $6.93 Million | $17.04 Million | ▲ +43.4% |
| 2014 | 0.28x | $5.43 Million | $19.17 Million | ▲ +113.8% |
| 2013 | 0.13x | $2.84 Million | $21.43 Million | ▼ -66.9% |
| 2012 | 0.40x | $8.67 Million | $21.66 Million | ▲ +97.5% |
| 2011 | 0.20x | $4.86 Million | $23.98 Million | ▼ -67.9% |
| 2010 | 0.63x | $12.19 Million | $19.29 Million | ▼ -34.4% |
| 2009 | 0.96x | $13.53 Million | $14.04 Million | ▲ +80.3% |
| 2008 | 0.53x | $8.05 Million | $15.06 Million | ▲ +212.6% |
| 2007 | 0.17x | $4.10 Million | $23.98 Million | ▼ -62.3% |
| 2006 | 0.45x | $8.16 Million | $18.00 Million | ▼ -45.4% |
| 2005 | 0.83x | $11.53 Million | $13.89 Million | ▲ +466.6% |
| 2004 | 0.15x | $714.00K | $4.87 Million | ▼ -62.1% |
| 2003 | 0.39x | $1.66 Million | $4.29 Million | ▲ +16.9% |
| 2002 | 0.33x | $3.00 Million | $9.06 Million | ▲ +15.6% |
| 2001 | 0.29x | $2.06 Million | $7.19 Million | ▲ +66.5% |
| 2000 | 0.17x | $1.47 Million | $8.52 Million | ▼ -62.8% |
| 1999 | 0.46x | $5.00 Million | $10.80 Million | ▲ +924.1% |
| 1998 | -0.06x | $-500.00K | $8.90 Million | ▲ +96.7% |
| 1997 | -1.71x | $-1.20 Million | $700.00K | ▲ +42.9% |
| 1996 | -3.00x | $-1.50 Million | $500.00K | ▲ +66.7% |
| 1995 | -9.00x | $-3.60 Million | $400.00K | ▼ -200.0% |
| 1994 | -3.00x | $-2.10 Million | $700.00K | ▲ +42.9% |
| 1993 | -5.25x | $-2.10 Million | $400.00K | ▼ -45.8% |
| 1992 | -3.60x | $-1.80 Million | $500.00K | — |