Galectin Therapeutics Inc (GALT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Galectin Therapeutics Inc (GALT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.03x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-3.87 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($146.00 Million) in one year. Explore GALT long-term asset investment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Galectin Therapeutics Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2000–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Galectin Therapeutics Inc across 26 annual periods. Also explore how large is Galectin Therapeutics Inc's balance sheet for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Galectin Therapeutics Inc (2000–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Galectin Therapeutics Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Galectin Therapeutics Inc (GALT) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.16x | $-23.88 Million | $145.73 Million | ▲ +52.7% |
| 2024 | -0.35x | $-41.77 Million | $120.56 Million | ▲ +7.1% |
| 2023 | -0.37x | $-32.97 Million | $88.44 Million | ▲ +35.8% |
| 2022 | -0.58x | $-31.06 Million | $53.48 Million | ▲ +6.3% |
| 2021 | -0.62x | $-24.31 Million | $39.21 Million | ▲ +83.7% |
| 2020 | -3.81x | $-20.60 Million | $5.41 Million | ▼ -0.9% |
| 2019 | -3.78x | $-10.85 Million | $2.87 Million | ▲ +21.8% |
| 2018 | -4.83x | $-10.18 Million | $2.11 Million | ▲ +9.8% |
| 2017 | -5.35x | $-15.89 Million | $2.97 Million | ▼ -23.3% |
| 2016 | -4.34x | $-16.41 Million | $3.78 Million | ▲ +65.2% |
| 2015 | -12.49x | $-16.98 Million | $1.36 Million | ▼ -71.1% |
| 2014 | -7.30x | $-12.43 Million | $1.70 Million | ▼ -142.4% |
| 2013 | -3.01x | $-7.48 Million | $2.49 Million | ▲ +34.0% |
| 2012 | -4.56x | $-7.50 Million | $1.64 Million | ▼ -78.0% |
| 2011 | -2.56x | $-5.68 Million | $2.21 Million | ▼ -560.4% |
| 2010 | -0.39x | $-3.10 Million | $7.99 Million | ▲ +51.1% |
| 2009 | -0.79x | $-3.89 Million | $4.90 Million | ▲ +80.1% |
| 2008 | -3.98x | $-4.67 Million | $1.17 Million | ▼ -241.3% |
| 2007 | -1.17x | $-5.48 Million | $4.71 Million | ▼ -10.1% |
| 2006 | -1.06x | $-6.76 Million | $6.38 Million | ▲ +76.2% |
| 2005 | -4.44x | $-6.13 Million | $1.38 Million | ▲ +29.5% |
| 2004 | -6.30x | $-6.33 Million | $1.00 Million | ▲ +42.6% |
| 2003 | -10.99x | $-4.15 Million | $377.91K | ▼ -145.6% |
| 2002 | -4.47x | $-2.98 Million | $666.79K | ▼ -36.9% |
| 2001 | -3.27x | $-1.80 Million | $550.70K | ▼ -553.5% |
| 2000 | -0.50x | $-90.00K | $180.00K | — |