Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd (GILT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd (GILT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.27 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($216.56 Million) in one year. See GILT FCF to total liabilities ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd across 35 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd cash conversion from operations.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd (1991–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. Check Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.09x | $20.68 Million | $240.15 Million | ▼ -65.9% |
| 2024 | 0.25x | $31.67 Million | $125.31 Million | ▲ +20.4% |
| 2023 | 0.21x | $31.94 Million | $152.20 Million | ▲ +174.2% |
| 2022 | 0.08x | $10.81 Million | $141.29 Million | ▼ -51.6% |
| 2021 | 0.16x | $18.90 Million | $119.41 Million | ▼ -40.7% |
| 2020 | 0.27x | $43.16 Million | $161.80 Million | ▲ +6.0% |
| 2019 | 0.25x | $34.78 Million | $138.25 Million | ▲ +22.3% |
| 2018 | 0.21x | $32.02 Million | $155.68 Million | ▲ +66.6% |
| 2017 | 0.12x | $20.80 Million | $168.50 Million | ▲ +98.6% |
| 2016 | 0.06x | $10.78 Million | $173.37 Million | ▲ +181.0% |
| 2015 | -0.08x | $-14.79 Million | $192.75 Million | ▲ +33.7% |
| 2014 | -0.12x | $-16.16 Million | $139.77 Million | ▼ -194.0% |
| 2013 | 0.12x | $17.56 Million | $142.74 Million | ▼ -1.5% |
| 2012 | 0.12x | $21.57 Million | $172.69 Million | ▲ +171.1% |
| 2011 | 0.05x | $8.60 Million | $186.60 Million | ▼ -31.8% |
| 2010 | 0.07x | $12.92 Million | $191.26 Million | ▲ +4196.7% |
| 2009 | 0.00x | $-206.00K | $124.93 Million | ▲ +98.5% |
| 2008 | -0.11x | $-19.62 Million | $180.41 Million | ▼ -196.6% |
| 2007 | 0.11x | $22.77 Million | $202.29 Million | ▼ -32.1% |
| 2006 | 0.17x | $37.82 Million | $228.16 Million | ▲ +1192.6% |
| 2005 | 0.01x | $3.69 Million | $287.48 Million | ▼ -86.4% |
| 2004 | 0.09x | $30.52 Million | $323.43 Million | ▼ -16.6% |
| 2003 | 0.11x | $36.52 Million | $322.61 Million | ▲ +1169.5% |
| 2002 | -0.01x | $-6.81 Million | $643.30 Million | ▲ +95.7% |
| 2001 | -0.24x | $-163.62 Million | $670.66 Million | ▼ -26.7% |
| 2000 | -0.19x | $-123.92 Million | $643.68 Million | ▲ +21.2% |
| 1999 | -0.24x | $-43.74 Million | $179.03 Million | ▼ -346.1% |
| 1998 | -0.05x | $-10.40 Million | $189.90 Million | ▲ +28.1% |
| 1997 | -0.08x | $-7.90 Million | $103.70 Million | ▼ -326.6% |
| 1996 | -0.02x | $-400.00K | $22.40 Million | ▲ +89.2% |
| 1995 | -0.16x | $-1.60 Million | $9.70 Million | ▼ -151.7% |
| 1994 | 0.32x | $1.50 Million | $4.70 Million | ▲ +136.2% |
| 1993 | -0.88x | $-3.70 Million | $4.20 Million | ▼ -346.9% |
| 1992 | 0.36x | $1.82 Million | $5.10 Million | ▲ +122.9% |
| 1991 | -1.56x | $-1.40 Million | $900.00K | — |