Grace Therapeutics, Inc. (GRCE) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of December 2025: -0.62x

Grace Therapeutics, Inc. (GRCE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.62x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.22 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities ($3.60 Million) in one year. See Grace Therapeutics, Inc. financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

-0.62x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

$-2.22 Million
USD

Total Liabilities

$3.60 Million
USD

Data as of

Dec 2025
Most recent filing

Grace Therapeutics, Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2010–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Grace Therapeutics, Inc. across 15 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Grace Therapeutics, Inc. cash conversion from operations.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Grace Therapeutics, Inc. (2010–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Grace Therapeutics, Inc.. Check earnings quality score of Grace Therapeutics, Inc. to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (USD) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 -2.77x $-14.90 Million $5.38 Million ▼ -159.5%
2024 -1.07x $-12.33 Million $11.56 Million ▲ +25.1%
2023 -1.42x $-15.91 Million $11.17 Million ▼ -68.2%
2022 -0.85x $-17.23 Million $20.35 Million ▲ +59.8%
2021 -2.11x $-14.32 Million $6.80 Million ▲ +9.5%
2020 -2.33x $-22.95 Million $9.86 Million ▼ -142.8%
2019 -0.96x $-24.79 Million $25.85 Million ▼ -12.9%
2018 -0.85x $-9.69 Million $11.41 Million ▲ +83.2%
2016 -5.07x $-4.85 Million $957.12K ▼ -180.2%
2015 -1.81x $-5.75 Million $3.18 Million ▼ -228.3%
2014 -0.55x $-6.12 Million $11.10 Million ▲ +47.1%
2013 -1.04x $-2.49 Million $2.39 Million ▲ +76.6%
2012 -4.46x $-5.65 Million $1.27 Million ▼ -1120.5%
2011 -0.37x $-1.91 Million $5.24 Million ▲ +6.2%
2010 -0.39x $-1.90 Million $4.88 Million
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.