Hall of Fame Resort Entertainment Co Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: 0.00x

Hall of Fame Resort Entertainment Co cash flow-to-debt ratio. Hall of Fame Resort Entertainment Co (HOFV) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-1.60 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($325.72 Million) in one year. Check how high is Hall of Fame Resort Entertainment Co's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.00x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

$-1.60 Million
USD

Total Liabilities

$325.72 Million
USD

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Hall of Fame Resort Entertainment Co (2017–2024)

Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Hall of Fame Resort Entertainment Co from 2017 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Hall of Fame Resort Entertainment Co across 8 annual periods. Check total reinvestment intensity of Hall of Fame Resort Entertainment Co to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.

Hall of Fame Resort Entertainment Co Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2017–2024)

Hall of Fame Resort Entertainment Co cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2017 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Hall of Fame Resort Entertainment Co. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Hall of Fame Resort Entertainment Co.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (USD) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 -0.04x $-10.91 Million $294.47 Million ▲ +56.7%
2023 -0.09x $-27.00 Million $315.16 Million ▼ -364.1%
2022 -0.02x $-4.89 Million $265.04 Million ▲ +88.2%
2021 -0.16x $-20.76 Million $132.71 Million ▼ -7.9%
2020 -0.15x $-18.37 Million $126.65 Million ▼ -3221.0%
2019 0.00x $933.02K $200.81 Million ▲ +104.9%
2018 -0.10x $-480.09K $5.04 Million ▼ -358.6%
2017 0.04x $6.49 Million $176.25 Million —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.