icad inc (ICAD) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
icad inc (ICAD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $60.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($8.68 Million) in one year. Check icad inc total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
icad inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1988–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for icad inc across 36 annual periods. Also explore how large is icad inc's balance sheet for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for icad inc (1988–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for icad inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see icad inc market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.45x | $-3.94 Million | $8.86 Million | ▲ +28.2% |
| 2023 | -0.62x | $-4.96 Million | $8.00 Million | ▲ +18.5% |
| 2022 | -0.76x | $-12.79 Million | $16.80 Million | ▼ -26.8% |
| 2021 | -0.60x | $-9.41 Million | $15.67 Million | ▼ -115.3% |
| 2020 | -0.28x | $-6.99 Million | $25.06 Million | ▼ -43.9% |
| 2019 | -0.19x | $-7.11 Million | $36.68 Million | ▼ -24.5% |
| 2018 | -0.16x | $-3.87 Million | $24.84 Million | ▲ +62.1% |
| 2017 | -0.41x | $-7.34 Million | $17.86 Million | ▼ -2.1% |
| 2016 | -0.40x | $-5.48 Million | $13.61 Million | ▼ -236.6% |
| 2015 | -0.12x | $-1.90 Million | $15.89 Million | ▼ -215.6% |
| 2014 | 0.10x | $3.20 Million | $30.99 Million | ▲ +372.5% |
| 2013 | -0.04x | $-1.42 Million | $37.54 Million | ▲ +70.8% |
| 2012 | -0.13x | $-4.20 Million | $32.33 Million | ▲ +79.9% |
| 2011 | -0.65x | $-10.14 Million | $15.71 Million | ▼ -6584.9% |
| 2010 | 0.01x | $207.33K | $20.82 Million | ▼ -97.9% |
| 2009 | 0.48x | $3.44 Million | $7.10 Million | ▼ -65.8% |
| 2008 | 1.42x | $9.78 Million | $6.90 Million | ▲ +3078.6% |
| 2007 | 0.04x | $574.57K | $12.88 Million | ▲ +112.5% |
| 2006 | -0.36x | $-4.41 Million | $12.32 Million | ▼ -143.1% |
| 2005 | -0.15x | $-1.30 Million | $8.80 Million | ▲ +38.3% |
| 2004 | -0.24x | $-1.95 Million | $8.17 Million | ▲ +24.4% |
| 2003 | -0.32x | $-4.67 Million | $14.77 Million | ▲ +35.2% |
| 2002 | -0.49x | $-2.26 Million | $4.62 Million | ▲ +24.8% |
| 2001 | -0.65x | $-1.38 Million | $2.12 Million | ▼ -243.9% |
| 2000 | -0.19x | $-574.33K | $3.04 Million | ▲ +49.1% |
| 1999 | -0.37x | $-1.00 Million | $2.70 Million | ▲ +27.7% |
| 1998 | -0.51x | $-2.10 Million | $4.10 Million | ▼ -144.1% |
| 1997 | 1.16x | $4.30 Million | $3.70 Million | ▲ +1111.1% |
| 1996 | -0.11x | $-1.00 Million | $8.70 Million | ▲ +4.2% |
| 1995 | -0.12x | $-1.20 Million | $10.00 Million | ▼ -237.1% |
| 1994 | 0.09x | $700.00K | $8.00 Million | ▼ -88.9% |
| 1993 | 0.79x | $4.40 Million | $5.60 Million | ▲ +502.4% |
| 1992 | 0.13x | $900.00K | $6.90 Million | ▲ +280.0% |
| 1991 | -0.07x | $-500.00K | $6.90 Million | ▲ +86.7% |
| 1990 | -0.55x | $-4.80 Million | $8.80 Million | ▼ -165.9% |
| 1988 | 0.83x | $9.10 Million | $11.00 Million | — |