icad inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
icad inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. icad inc (ICAD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $60.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($8.68 Million) in one year. Check icad inc cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of icad inc (1988–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of icad inc from 1988 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for icad inc across 36 annual periods. Check how aggressively does icad inc reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
icad inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1988–2024)
icad inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1988 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for icad inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does icad inc generate cash.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.45x | $-3.94 Million | $8.86 Million | ▲ +28.2% |
| 2023 | -0.62x | $-4.96 Million | $8.00 Million | ▲ +18.5% |
| 2022 | -0.76x | $-12.79 Million | $16.80 Million | ▼ -26.8% |
| 2021 | -0.60x | $-9.41 Million | $15.67 Million | ▼ -115.3% |
| 2020 | -0.28x | $-6.99 Million | $25.06 Million | ▼ -43.9% |
| 2019 | -0.19x | $-7.11 Million | $36.68 Million | ▼ -24.5% |
| 2018 | -0.16x | $-3.87 Million | $24.84 Million | ▲ +62.1% |
| 2017 | -0.41x | $-7.34 Million | $17.86 Million | ▼ -2.1% |
| 2016 | -0.40x | $-5.48 Million | $13.61 Million | ▼ -236.6% |
| 2015 | -0.12x | $-1.90 Million | $15.89 Million | ▼ -215.6% |
| 2014 | 0.10x | $3.20 Million | $30.99 Million | ▲ +372.5% |
| 2013 | -0.04x | $-1.42 Million | $37.54 Million | ▲ +70.8% |
| 2012 | -0.13x | $-4.20 Million | $32.33 Million | ▲ +79.9% |
| 2011 | -0.65x | $-10.14 Million | $15.71 Million | ▼ -6584.9% |
| 2010 | 0.01x | $207.33K | $20.82 Million | ▼ -97.9% |
| 2009 | 0.48x | $3.44 Million | $7.10 Million | ▼ -65.8% |
| 2008 | 1.42x | $9.78 Million | $6.90 Million | ▲ +3078.6% |
| 2007 | 0.04x | $574.57K | $12.88 Million | ▲ +112.5% |
| 2006 | -0.36x | $-4.41 Million | $12.32 Million | ▼ -143.1% |
| 2005 | -0.15x | $-1.30 Million | $8.80 Million | ▲ +38.3% |
| 2004 | -0.24x | $-1.95 Million | $8.17 Million | ▲ +24.4% |
| 2003 | -0.32x | $-4.67 Million | $14.77 Million | ▲ +35.2% |
| 2002 | -0.49x | $-2.26 Million | $4.62 Million | ▲ +24.8% |
| 2001 | -0.65x | $-1.38 Million | $2.12 Million | ▼ -243.9% |
| 2000 | -0.19x | $-574.33K | $3.04 Million | ▲ +49.1% |
| 1999 | -0.37x | $-1.00 Million | $2.70 Million | ▲ +27.7% |
| 1998 | -0.51x | $-2.10 Million | $4.10 Million | ▼ -144.1% |
| 1997 | 1.16x | $4.30 Million | $3.70 Million | ▲ +1111.1% |
| 1996 | -0.11x | $-1.00 Million | $8.70 Million | ▲ +4.2% |
| 1995 | -0.12x | $-1.20 Million | $10.00 Million | ▼ -237.1% |
| 1994 | 0.09x | $700.00K | $8.00 Million | ▼ -88.9% |
| 1993 | 0.79x | $4.40 Million | $5.60 Million | ▲ +502.4% |
| 1992 | 0.13x | $900.00K | $6.90 Million | ▲ +280.0% |
| 1991 | -0.07x | $-500.00K | $6.90 Million | ▲ +86.7% |
| 1990 | -0.55x | $-4.80 Million | $8.80 Million | ▼ -165.9% |
| 1988 | 0.83x | $9.10 Million | $11.00 Million | — |