Imunon Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Imunon Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Imunon Inc (IMNN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -369.50x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-3.99 Billion could theoretically repay -369% of its total liabilities ($10.80 Million) in one year. Check Imunon Inc (IMNN) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Imunon Inc (1996–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Imunon Inc from 1996 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Imunon Inc across 30 annual periods. Check how aggressively does Imunon Inc reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Imunon Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2025)
Imunon Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Imunon Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see IMNN operating cash flow.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -2.66x | $-13.90 Million | $5.23 Million | ▲ +22.8% |
| 2024 | -3.45x | $-18.85 Million | $5.47 Million | ▼ -54.5% |
| 2023 | -2.23x | $-19.02 Million | $8.53 Million | ▼ -41.4% |
| 2022 | -1.58x | $-23.10 Million | $14.65 Million | ▼ -77.4% |
| 2021 | -0.89x | $-16.22 Million | $18.25 Million | ▼ -7.7% |
| 2020 | -0.83x | $-15.62 Million | $18.92 Million | ▲ +3.3% |
| 2019 | -0.85x | $-20.26 Million | $23.72 Million | ▼ -215.3% |
| 2018 | -0.27x | $-7.04 Million | $25.99 Million | ▲ +66.1% |
| 2017 | -0.80x | $-16.64 Million | $20.81 Million | ▼ -5.0% |
| 2016 | -0.76x | $-18.38 Million | $24.12 Million | ▼ -4.8% |
| 2015 | -0.73x | $-20.83 Million | $28.64 Million | ▼ -15.4% |
| 2014 | -0.63x | $-21.35 Million | $33.87 Million | ▲ +6.4% |
| 2013 | -0.67x | $-9.53 Million | $14.15 Million | ▲ +59.3% |
| 2012 | -1.65x | $-22.14 Million | $13.40 Million | ▲ +53.1% |
| 2011 | -3.52x | $-22.74 Million | $6.46 Million | ▼ -87.1% |
| 2010 | -1.88x | $-13.37 Million | $7.10 Million | ▼ -865.1% |
| 2009 | -0.20x | $-930.33K | $4.77 Million | ▼ -133.9% |
| 2008 | 0.58x | $2.28 Million | $3.96 Million | ▲ +150.4% |
| 2007 | -1.14x | $-9.58 Million | $8.39 Million | ▼ -249.6% |
| 2006 | -0.33x | $-7.23 Million | $22.13 Million | ▲ +49.4% |
| 2005 | -0.65x | $-8.06 Million | $12.48 Million | ▲ +76.5% |
| 2004 | -2.74x | $-13.94 Million | $5.08 Million | ▲ +70.2% |
| 2003 | -9.21x | $-9.09 Million | $986.84K | ▲ +21.7% |
| 2002 | -11.76x | $-9.11 Million | $774.96K | ▲ +45.7% |
| 2001 | -21.64x | $-6.22 Million | $287.64K | ▼ -119.0% |
| 2000 | -9.88x | $-3.87 Million | $391.39K | ▼ -157.7% |
| 1999 | -3.83x | $-2.30 Million | $600.00K | ▼ -295.9% |
| 1998 | -0.97x | $-2.11 Million | $2.18 Million | ▼ -175.3% |
| 1997 | -0.35x | $-1.15 Million | $3.28 Million | ▲ +38.3% |
| 1996 | -0.57x | $-1.46 Million | $2.57 Million | — |