Imperial Petroleum Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Imperial Petroleum Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Imperial Petroleum Inc (IMPP) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.72x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $41.58 Million could theoretically repay 1% of its total liabilities ($58.14 Million) in one year. Check how aggressively does Imperial Petroleum Inc reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Imperial Petroleum Inc (1997–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Imperial Petroleum Inc from 1997 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Imperial Petroleum Inc across 22 annual periods. Check Imperial Petroleum Inc earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Imperial Petroleum Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1997–2025)
Imperial Petroleum Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1997 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Imperial Petroleum Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Imperial Petroleum Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 4.87x | $80.78 Million | $16.59 Million | ▲ +80.7% |
| 2024 | 2.69x | $77.70 Million | $28.84 Million | ▼ -50.8% |
| 2023 | 5.47x | $79.53 Million | $14.53 Million | ▲ +1026.5% |
| 2022 | 0.49x | $40.90 Million | $84.17 Million | ▲ +194.2% |
| 2021 | 0.17x | $5.24 Million | $31.72 Million | ▼ -92.4% |
| 2020 | 2.18x | $8.87 Million | $4.06 Million | ▼ -50.9% |
| 2019 | 4.45x | $8.57 Million | $1.93 Million | ▲ +2437.4% |
| 2011 | 0.18x | $3.45 Million | $19.64 Million | ▲ +1283.6% |
| 2010 | -0.01x | $-427.81K | $28.85 Million | ▲ +98.4% |
| 2009 | -0.91x | $-2.05 Million | $2.25 Million | ▼ -641.2% |
| 2008 | -0.12x | $-1.99 Million | $16.17 Million | ▲ +33.5% |
| 2007 | -0.18x | $-2.49 Million | $13.46 Million | ▼ -562.9% |
| 2006 | -0.03x | $-655.32K | $23.51 Million | ▲ +59.8% |
| 2005 | -0.07x | $-1.34 Million | $19.28 Million | ▼ -316.7% |
| 2004 | 0.03x | $526.91K | $16.47 Million | ▲ +149.5% |
| 2003 | -0.06x | $-136.55K | $2.11 Million | ▼ -93.3% |
| 2002 | -0.03x | $-77.70K | $2.33 Million | ▲ +26.8% |
| 2001 | -0.05x | $-112.87K | $2.47 Million | ▼ -13.8% |
| 2000 | -0.04x | $-84.28K | $2.10 Million | ▲ +15.9% |
| 1999 | -0.05x | $-85.04K | $1.78 Million | ▲ +87.8% |
| 1998 | -0.39x | $-539.44K | $1.38 Million | ▼ -1461.4% |
| 1997 | 0.03x | $18.16K | $630.86K | — |