Immunoprecise Antibodies Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Immunoprecise Antibodies Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. Immunoprecise Antibodies Ltd (IPA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.05x as of April 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-1.14 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($20.82 Million) in one year. Check IPA cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Immunoprecise Antibodies Ltd (1997–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Immunoprecise Antibodies Ltd from 1997 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Immunoprecise Antibodies Ltd across 29 annual periods. Check Immunoprecise Antibodies Ltd investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Immunoprecise Antibodies Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1997–2025)
Immunoprecise Antibodies Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1997 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Immunoprecise Antibodies Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Immunoprecise Antibodies Ltd.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.31x | $-6.41 Million | $20.82 Million | ▼ -89.1% |
| 2024 | -0.16x | $-4.25 Million | $26.07 Million | ▲ +83.6% |
| 2023 | -0.99x | $-19.83 Million | $20.01 Million | ▼ -81.9% |
| 2022 | -0.54x | $-9.92 Million | $18.21 Million | ▼ -811.2% |
| 2021 | -0.06x | $-600.00K | $10.04 Million | ▲ +47.7% |
| 2020 | -0.11x | $-1.39 Million | $12.18 Million | ▲ +63.4% |
| 2019 | -0.31x | $-3.21 Million | $10.28 Million | ▼ -8.4% |
| 2018 | -0.29x | $-3.42 Million | $11.87 Million | ▲ +66.6% |
| 2017 | -0.86x | $-721.65K | $836.91K | ▼ -243.3% |
| 2016 | 0.60x | $284.09K | $472.15K | ▲ +524.3% |
| 2015 | -0.14x | $-36.11K | $254.64K | ▲ +7.7% |
| 2014 | -0.15x | $-46.60K | $303.50K | ▼ -840.9% |
| 2013 | -0.02x | $-4.33K | $265.63K | ▲ +97.4% |
| 2012 | -0.62x | $-132.72K | $213.10K | ▲ +14.6% |
| 2011 | -0.73x | $-80.39K | $110.21K | ▲ +76.9% |
| 2010 | -3.15x | $-308.49K | $97.87K | ▼ -205.4% |
| 2009 | -1.03x | $-155.68K | $150.84K | ▲ +92.6% |
| 2008 | -13.97x | $-523.45K | $37.46K | ▼ -1844.4% |
| 2007 | -0.72x | $-297.31K | $413.69K | ▲ +9.9% |
| 2006 | -0.80x | $-110.59K | $138.62K | ▲ +54.2% |
| 2005 | -1.74x | $-82.20K | $47.18K | ▲ +51.3% |
| 2004 | -3.58x | $-178.69K | $49.92K | ▲ +37.2% |
| 2003 | -5.70x | $-168.38K | $29.53K | ▼ -281.9% |
| 2002 | -1.49x | $-280.23K | $187.72K | ▼ -16357.5% |
| 2001 | -0.01x | $-8.13K | $896.75K | ▲ +100.0% |
| 2000 | -20.63x | $-208.54K | $10.11K | ▼ -263.7% |
| 1999 | -5.67x | $-202.94K | $35.78K | ▼ -68.5% |
| 1998 | -3.37x | $-226.81K | $67.39K | ▼ -677.8% |
| 1997 | -0.43x | $-108.20K | $250.04K | — |