Intuitive Surgical Inc (ISRG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Intuitive Surgical Inc (ISRG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.41x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.06 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.58 Billion) in one year. See Intuitive Surgical Inc financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Intuitive Surgical Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Intuitive Surgical Inc across 27 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Intuitive Surgical Inc.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Intuitive Surgical Inc (1999–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Intuitive Surgical Inc. Check ISRG operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.13x | $3.03 Billion | $2.69 Billion | ▲ +7.7% |
| 2024 | 1.05x | $2.42 Billion | $2.31 Billion | ▲ +17.9% |
| 2023 | 0.89x | $1.81 Billion | $2.04 Billion | ▲ +10.8% |
| 2022 | 0.80x | $1.49 Billion | $1.86 Billion | ▼ -38.5% |
| 2021 | 1.30x | $2.09 Billion | $1.60 Billion | ▲ +23.7% |
| 2020 | 1.05x | $1.48 Billion | $1.41 Billion | ▼ -4.5% |
| 2019 | 1.10x | $1.60 Billion | $1.45 Billion | ▲ +9.4% |
| 2018 | 1.01x | $1.17 Billion | $1.16 Billion | ▼ -9.0% |
| 2017 | 1.11x | $1.14 Billion | $1.03 Billion | ▼ -24.6% |
| 2016 | 1.47x | $1.04 Billion | $709.10 Million | ▲ +12.0% |
| 2015 | 1.31x | $771.90 Million | $587.80 Million | ▲ +14.5% |
| 2014 | 1.15x | $665.10 Million | $580.00 Million | ▼ -41.5% |
| 2013 | 1.96x | $880.00 Million | $448.90 Million | ▲ +15.4% |
| 2012 | 1.70x | $814.20 Million | $479.10 Million | ▲ +4.7% |
| 2011 | 1.62x | $677.60 Million | $417.50 Million | ▲ +8.5% |
| 2010 | 1.50x | $528.00 Million | $353.00 Million | ▲ +5.8% |
| 2009 | 1.41x | $385.06 Million | $272.43 Million | ▲ +5.6% |
| 2008 | 1.34x | $278.24 Million | $207.86 Million | ▼ -1.5% |
| 2007 | 1.36x | $205.69 Million | $151.32 Million | ▲ +11.7% |
| 2006 | 1.22x | $99.84 Million | $82.08 Million | ▲ +1.4% |
| 2005 | 1.20x | $70.79 Million | $59.00 Million | ▲ +55.5% |
| 2004 | 0.77x | $30.32 Million | $39.30 Million | ▲ +454.0% |
| 2003 | -0.22x | $-7.85 Million | $36.04 Million | ▲ +57.0% |
| 2002 | -0.51x | $-14.15 Million | $27.90 Million | ▲ +39.7% |
| 2001 | -0.84x | $-18.55 Million | $22.07 Million | ▼ -42.4% |
| 2000 | -0.59x | $-12.80 Million | $21.69 Million | ▲ +54.6% |
| 1999 | -1.30x | $-15.93 Million | $12.24 Million | — |