Intuitive Surgical Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Intuitive Surgical Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Intuitive Surgical Inc (ISRG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.41x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.06 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.58 Billion) in one year. Check ISRG cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Intuitive Surgical Inc (1999–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Intuitive Surgical Inc from 1999 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Intuitive Surgical Inc across 27 annual periods. Check how aggressively does Intuitive Surgical Inc reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Intuitive Surgical Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1999–2025)
Intuitive Surgical Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1999 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Intuitive Surgical Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Intuitive Surgical Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.13x | $3.03 Billion | $2.69 Billion | ▲ +7.7% |
| 2024 | 1.05x | $2.42 Billion | $2.31 Billion | ▲ +17.9% |
| 2023 | 0.89x | $1.81 Billion | $2.04 Billion | ▲ +10.8% |
| 2022 | 0.80x | $1.49 Billion | $1.86 Billion | ▼ -38.5% |
| 2021 | 1.30x | $2.09 Billion | $1.60 Billion | ▲ +23.7% |
| 2020 | 1.05x | $1.48 Billion | $1.41 Billion | ▼ -4.5% |
| 2019 | 1.10x | $1.60 Billion | $1.45 Billion | ▲ +9.4% |
| 2018 | 1.01x | $1.17 Billion | $1.16 Billion | ▼ -9.0% |
| 2017 | 1.11x | $1.14 Billion | $1.03 Billion | ▼ -24.6% |
| 2016 | 1.47x | $1.04 Billion | $709.10 Million | ▲ +12.0% |
| 2015 | 1.31x | $771.90 Million | $587.80 Million | ▲ +14.5% |
| 2014 | 1.15x | $665.10 Million | $580.00 Million | ▼ -41.5% |
| 2013 | 1.96x | $880.00 Million | $448.90 Million | ▲ +15.4% |
| 2012 | 1.70x | $814.20 Million | $479.10 Million | ▲ +4.7% |
| 2011 | 1.62x | $677.60 Million | $417.50 Million | ▲ +8.5% |
| 2010 | 1.50x | $528.00 Million | $353.00 Million | ▲ +5.8% |
| 2009 | 1.41x | $385.06 Million | $272.43 Million | ▲ +5.6% |
| 2008 | 1.34x | $278.24 Million | $207.86 Million | ▼ -1.5% |
| 2007 | 1.36x | $205.69 Million | $151.32 Million | ▲ +11.7% |
| 2006 | 1.22x | $99.84 Million | $82.08 Million | ▲ +1.4% |
| 2005 | 1.20x | $70.79 Million | $59.00 Million | ▲ +55.5% |
| 2004 | 0.77x | $30.32 Million | $39.30 Million | ▲ +454.0% |
| 2003 | -0.22x | $-7.85 Million | $36.04 Million | ▲ +57.0% |
| 2002 | -0.51x | $-14.15 Million | $27.90 Million | ▲ +39.7% |
| 2001 | -0.84x | $-18.55 Million | $22.07 Million | ▼ -42.4% |
| 2000 | -0.59x | $-12.80 Million | $21.69 Million | ▲ +54.6% |
| 1999 | -1.30x | $-15.93 Million | $12.24 Million | — |