Key Tronic Corporation (KTCC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Key Tronic Corporation (KTCC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-4.01 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($219.78 Million) in one year. See KTCC financial flexibility score to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Key Tronic Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Key Tronic Corporation across 34 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Key Tronic Corporation operating cash flow efficiency.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Key Tronic Corporation (1992–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Key Tronic Corporation. Check KTCC operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.10x | $18.93 Million | $198.74 Million | ▲ +60.0% |
| 2024 | 0.06x | $13.78 Million | $231.35 Million | ▲ +251.4% |
| 2023 | -0.04x | $-11.31 Million | $287.65 Million | ▼ -126.0% |
| 2022 | -0.02x | $-4.91 Million | $282.05 Million | ▲ +72.5% |
| 2021 | -0.06x | $-15.05 Million | $238.14 Million | ▲ +61.4% |
| 2020 | -0.16x | $-31.00 Million | $189.30 Million | ▼ -2307.2% |
| 2019 | 0.01x | $919.00K | $123.85 Million | ▼ -91.7% |
| 2018 | 0.09x | $11.46 Million | $128.45 Million | ▲ +10.0% |
| 2017 | 0.08x | $9.43 Million | $116.27 Million | ▲ +130.7% |
| 2016 | 0.04x | $4.58 Million | $130.34 Million | ▼ -40.4% |
| 2015 | 0.06x | $7.67 Million | $130.03 Million | ▲ +114.4% |
| 2014 | 0.03x | $1.46 Million | $53.02 Million | ▼ -96.2% |
| 2013 | 0.71x | $29.28 Million | $40.97 Million | ▲ +1162.4% |
| 2012 | -0.07x | $-5.07 Million | $75.31 Million | ▼ -27.0% |
| 2011 | -0.05x | $-2.57 Million | $48.52 Million | ▼ -160.5% |
| 2010 | 0.09x | $3.70 Million | $42.23 Million | ▼ -76.8% |
| 2009 | 0.38x | $10.04 Million | $26.64 Million | ▲ +2685.2% |
| 2008 | -0.01x | $-718.00K | $49.26 Million | ▲ +63.8% |
| 2007 | -0.04x | $-1.86 Million | $46.14 Million | ▼ -5953.9% |
| 2006 | 0.00x | $-34.00K | $51.15 Million | ▼ -100.6% |
| 2005 | 0.11x | $5.11 Million | $45.26 Million | ▲ +29811.5% |
| 2004 | 0.00x | $-17.00K | $44.70 Million | ▲ +97.5% |
| 2003 | -0.02x | $-544.00K | $36.01 Million | ▼ -178.5% |
| 2002 | 0.02x | $919.00K | $47.73 Million | ▼ -89.9% |
| 2001 | 0.19x | $7.48 Million | $39.05 Million | ▲ +189.5% |
| 2000 | 0.07x | $3.26 Million | $49.21 Million | ▼ -22.8% |
| 1999 | 0.09x | $4.20 Million | $49.00 Million | ▼ -47.0% |
| 1998 | 0.16x | $7.80 Million | $48.20 Million | ▲ +1065.1% |
| 1997 | 0.01x | $700.00K | $50.40 Million | ▼ -96.8% |
| 1996 | 0.43x | $19.10 Million | $44.00 Million | ▲ +765.5% |
| 1995 | 0.05x | $3.20 Million | $63.80 Million | ▲ +511.3% |
| 1994 | -0.01x | $-700.00K | $57.40 Million | ▼ -106.2% |
| 1993 | 0.20x | $3.60 Million | $18.40 Million | ▲ +6.1% |
| 1992 | 0.18x | $4.00 Million | $21.70 Million | — |