Key Tronic Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Key Tronic Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Key Tronic Corporation (KTCC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-4.01 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($219.78 Million) in one year. Check Key Tronic Corporation (KTCC) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Key Tronic Corporation (1992–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Key Tronic Corporation from 1992 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Key Tronic Corporation across 34 annual periods. Check Key Tronic Corporation (KTCC) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Key Tronic Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1992–2025)
Key Tronic Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1992 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Key Tronic Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Key Tronic Corporation cash conversion from operations.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.10x | $18.93 Million | $198.74 Million | ▲ +60.0% |
| 2024 | 0.06x | $13.78 Million | $231.35 Million | ▲ +251.4% |
| 2023 | -0.04x | $-11.31 Million | $287.65 Million | ▼ -126.0% |
| 2022 | -0.02x | $-4.91 Million | $282.05 Million | ▲ +72.5% |
| 2021 | -0.06x | $-15.05 Million | $238.14 Million | ▲ +61.4% |
| 2020 | -0.16x | $-31.00 Million | $189.30 Million | ▼ -2307.2% |
| 2019 | 0.01x | $919.00K | $123.85 Million | ▼ -91.7% |
| 2018 | 0.09x | $11.46 Million | $128.45 Million | ▲ +10.0% |
| 2017 | 0.08x | $9.43 Million | $116.27 Million | ▲ +130.7% |
| 2016 | 0.04x | $4.58 Million | $130.34 Million | ▼ -40.4% |
| 2015 | 0.06x | $7.67 Million | $130.03 Million | ▲ +114.4% |
| 2014 | 0.03x | $1.46 Million | $53.02 Million | ▼ -96.2% |
| 2013 | 0.71x | $29.28 Million | $40.97 Million | ▲ +1162.4% |
| 2012 | -0.07x | $-5.07 Million | $75.31 Million | ▼ -27.0% |
| 2011 | -0.05x | $-2.57 Million | $48.52 Million | ▼ -160.5% |
| 2010 | 0.09x | $3.70 Million | $42.23 Million | ▼ -76.8% |
| 2009 | 0.38x | $10.04 Million | $26.64 Million | ▲ +2685.2% |
| 2008 | -0.01x | $-718.00K | $49.26 Million | ▲ +63.8% |
| 2007 | -0.04x | $-1.86 Million | $46.14 Million | ▼ -5953.9% |
| 2006 | 0.00x | $-34.00K | $51.15 Million | ▼ -100.6% |
| 2005 | 0.11x | $5.11 Million | $45.26 Million | ▲ +29811.5% |
| 2004 | 0.00x | $-17.00K | $44.70 Million | ▲ +97.5% |
| 2003 | -0.02x | $-544.00K | $36.01 Million | ▼ -178.5% |
| 2002 | 0.02x | $919.00K | $47.73 Million | ▼ -89.9% |
| 2001 | 0.19x | $7.48 Million | $39.05 Million | ▲ +189.5% |
| 2000 | 0.07x | $3.26 Million | $49.21 Million | ▼ -22.8% |
| 1999 | 0.09x | $4.20 Million | $49.00 Million | ▼ -47.0% |
| 1998 | 0.16x | $7.80 Million | $48.20 Million | ▲ +1065.1% |
| 1997 | 0.01x | $700.00K | $50.40 Million | ▼ -96.8% |
| 1996 | 0.43x | $19.10 Million | $44.00 Million | ▲ +765.5% |
| 1995 | 0.05x | $3.20 Million | $63.80 Million | ▲ +511.3% |
| 1994 | -0.01x | $-700.00K | $57.40 Million | ▼ -106.2% |
| 1993 | 0.20x | $3.60 Million | $18.40 Million | ▲ +6.1% |
| 1992 | 0.18x | $4.00 Million | $21.70 Million | — |