Key Tronic Corporation (KTCC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Key Tronic Corporation (KTCC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-4.01 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($219.78 Million) in one year. See how much free cash does Key Tronic Corporation generate to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Key Tronic Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Key Tronic Corporation across 34 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Key Tronic Corporation to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Key Tronic Corporation (1992–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Key Tronic Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Key Tronic Corporation stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.10x | $18.93 Million | $198.74 Million | ▲ +60.0% |
| 2024 | 0.06x | $13.78 Million | $231.35 Million | ▲ +251.4% |
| 2023 | -0.04x | $-11.31 Million | $287.65 Million | ▼ -126.0% |
| 2022 | -0.02x | $-4.91 Million | $282.05 Million | ▲ +72.5% |
| 2021 | -0.06x | $-15.05 Million | $238.14 Million | ▲ +61.4% |
| 2020 | -0.16x | $-31.00 Million | $189.30 Million | ▼ -2307.2% |
| 2019 | 0.01x | $919.00K | $123.85 Million | ▼ -91.7% |
| 2018 | 0.09x | $11.46 Million | $128.45 Million | ▲ +10.0% |
| 2017 | 0.08x | $9.43 Million | $116.27 Million | ▲ +130.7% |
| 2016 | 0.04x | $4.58 Million | $130.34 Million | ▼ -40.4% |
| 2015 | 0.06x | $7.67 Million | $130.03 Million | ▲ +114.4% |
| 2014 | 0.03x | $1.46 Million | $53.02 Million | ▼ -96.2% |
| 2013 | 0.71x | $29.28 Million | $40.97 Million | ▲ +1162.4% |
| 2012 | -0.07x | $-5.07 Million | $75.31 Million | ▼ -27.0% |
| 2011 | -0.05x | $-2.57 Million | $48.52 Million | ▼ -160.5% |
| 2010 | 0.09x | $3.70 Million | $42.23 Million | ▼ -76.8% |
| 2009 | 0.38x | $10.04 Million | $26.64 Million | ▲ +2685.2% |
| 2008 | -0.01x | $-718.00K | $49.26 Million | ▲ +63.8% |
| 2007 | -0.04x | $-1.86 Million | $46.14 Million | ▼ -5953.9% |
| 2006 | 0.00x | $-34.00K | $51.15 Million | ▼ -100.6% |
| 2005 | 0.11x | $5.11 Million | $45.26 Million | ▲ +29811.5% |
| 2004 | 0.00x | $-17.00K | $44.70 Million | ▲ +97.5% |
| 2003 | -0.02x | $-544.00K | $36.01 Million | ▼ -178.5% |
| 2002 | 0.02x | $919.00K | $47.73 Million | ▼ -89.9% |
| 2001 | 0.19x | $7.48 Million | $39.05 Million | ▲ +189.5% |
| 2000 | 0.07x | $3.26 Million | $49.21 Million | ▼ -22.8% |
| 1999 | 0.09x | $4.20 Million | $49.00 Million | ▼ -47.0% |
| 1998 | 0.16x | $7.80 Million | $48.20 Million | ▲ +1065.1% |
| 1997 | 0.01x | $700.00K | $50.40 Million | ▼ -96.8% |
| 1996 | 0.43x | $19.10 Million | $44.00 Million | ▲ +765.5% |
| 1995 | 0.05x | $3.20 Million | $63.80 Million | ▲ +511.3% |
| 1994 | -0.01x | $-700.00K | $57.40 Million | ▼ -106.2% |
| 1993 | 0.20x | $3.60 Million | $18.40 Million | ▲ +6.1% |
| 1992 | 0.18x | $4.00 Million | $21.70 Million | — |