Kazia Therapeutics Ltd ADR (KZIA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Kazia Therapeutics Ltd ADR (KZIA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.29x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-4.14 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($14.36 Million) in one year. Explore KZIA strategic capital deployment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Kazia Therapeutics Ltd ADR Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Kazia Therapeutics Ltd ADR across 27 annual periods. Also explore Kazia Therapeutics Ltd ADR asset portfolio for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Kazia Therapeutics Ltd ADR (1999–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Kazia Therapeutics Ltd ADR. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Kazia Therapeutics Ltd ADR.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.92x | $-13.28 Million | $14.36 Million | ▼ -204.9% |
| 2024 | -0.30x | $-9.58 Million | $31.60 Million | ▲ +67.9% |
| 2023 | -0.95x | $-15.16 Million | $16.03 Million | ▲ +26.9% |
| 2022 | -1.29x | $-22.76 Million | $17.61 Million | ▼ -187.0% |
| 2021 | -0.45x | $-9.11 Million | $20.24 Million | ▲ +54.3% |
| 2020 | -0.99x | $-8.81 Million | $8.94 Million | ▼ -2.9% |
| 2019 | -0.96x | $-6.71 Million | $7.01 Million | ▲ +1.2% |
| 2018 | -0.97x | $-8.66 Million | $8.93 Million | ▲ +10.4% |
| 2017 | -1.08x | $-11.43 Million | $10.57 Million | ▲ +85.7% |
| 2016 | -7.55x | $-11.98 Million | $1.59 Million | ▼ -133.1% |
| 2015 | -3.24x | $-5.76 Million | $1.78 Million | ▼ -84.3% |
| 2014 | -1.76x | $-5.71 Million | $3.25 Million | ▲ +22.6% |
| 2013 | -2.27x | $-8.79 Million | $3.87 Million | ▼ -19.7% |
| 2012 | -1.90x | $-7.35 Million | $3.87 Million | ▼ -81.2% |
| 2011 | -1.05x | $-8.70 Million | $8.31 Million | ▲ +61.4% |
| 2010 | -2.72x | $-16.61 Million | $6.11 Million | ▼ -19.6% |
| 2009 | -2.27x | $-20.60 Million | $9.07 Million | ▲ +12.3% |
| 2008 | -2.59x | $-20.10 Million | $7.76 Million | ▼ -19.3% |
| 2007 | -2.17x | $-14.63 Million | $6.74 Million | ▲ +2.1% |
| 2006 | -2.22x | $-14.44 Million | $6.52 Million | ▼ -21.0% |
| 2005 | -1.83x | $-12.76 Million | $6.97 Million | ▼ -409.1% |
| 2004 | -0.36x | $-10.48 Million | $29.12 Million | ▲ +48.3% |
| 2003 | -0.70x | $-5.83 Million | $8.38 Million | ▲ +18.2% |
| 2002 | -0.85x | $-6.68 Million | $7.86 Million | ▲ +54.7% |
| 2001 | -1.88x | $-34.18 Million | $18.22 Million | ▼ -22.9% |
| 2000 | -1.53x | $-18.75 Million | $12.29 Million | ▲ +39.0% |
| 1999 | -2.50x | $-20.97 Million | $8.39 Million | — |