Kazia Therapeutics Ltd ADR (KZIA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Kazia Therapeutics Ltd ADR (KZIA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.29x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-4.14 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($14.36 Million) in one year. See KZIA free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Kazia Therapeutics Ltd ADR Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Kazia Therapeutics Ltd ADR across 27 annual periods. Also explore net asset momentum of Kazia Therapeutics Ltd ADR to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Kazia Therapeutics Ltd ADR (1999–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Kazia Therapeutics Ltd ADR. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Kazia Therapeutics Ltd ADR.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.92x | $-13.28 Million | $14.36 Million | ▼ -204.9% |
| 2024 | -0.30x | $-9.58 Million | $31.60 Million | ▲ +67.9% |
| 2023 | -0.95x | $-15.16 Million | $16.03 Million | ▲ +26.9% |
| 2022 | -1.29x | $-22.76 Million | $17.61 Million | ▼ -187.0% |
| 2021 | -0.45x | $-9.11 Million | $20.24 Million | ▲ +54.3% |
| 2020 | -0.99x | $-8.81 Million | $8.94 Million | ▼ -2.9% |
| 2019 | -0.96x | $-6.71 Million | $7.01 Million | ▲ +1.2% |
| 2018 | -0.97x | $-8.66 Million | $8.93 Million | ▲ +10.4% |
| 2017 | -1.08x | $-11.43 Million | $10.57 Million | ▲ +85.7% |
| 2016 | -7.55x | $-11.98 Million | $1.59 Million | ▼ -133.1% |
| 2015 | -3.24x | $-5.76 Million | $1.78 Million | ▼ -84.3% |
| 2014 | -1.76x | $-5.71 Million | $3.25 Million | ▲ +22.6% |
| 2013 | -2.27x | $-8.79 Million | $3.87 Million | ▼ -19.7% |
| 2012 | -1.90x | $-7.35 Million | $3.87 Million | ▼ -81.2% |
| 2011 | -1.05x | $-8.70 Million | $8.31 Million | ▲ +61.4% |
| 2010 | -2.72x | $-16.61 Million | $6.11 Million | ▼ -19.6% |
| 2009 | -2.27x | $-20.60 Million | $9.07 Million | ▲ +12.3% |
| 2008 | -2.59x | $-20.10 Million | $7.76 Million | ▼ -19.3% |
| 2007 | -2.17x | $-14.63 Million | $6.74 Million | ▲ +2.1% |
| 2006 | -2.22x | $-14.44 Million | $6.52 Million | ▼ -21.0% |
| 2005 | -1.83x | $-12.76 Million | $6.97 Million | ▼ -409.1% |
| 2004 | -0.36x | $-10.48 Million | $29.12 Million | ▲ +48.3% |
| 2003 | -0.70x | $-5.83 Million | $8.38 Million | ▲ +18.2% |
| 2002 | -0.85x | $-6.68 Million | $7.86 Million | ▲ +54.7% |
| 2001 | -1.88x | $-34.18 Million | $18.22 Million | ▼ -22.9% |
| 2000 | -1.53x | $-18.75 Million | $12.29 Million | ▲ +39.0% |
| 1999 | -2.50x | $-20.97 Million | $8.39 Million | — |