Kazia Therapeutics Ltd ADR (KZIA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Kazia Therapeutics Ltd ADR (KZIA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.29x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-4.14 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($14.36 Million) in one year. See KZIA FCF to total liabilities ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Kazia Therapeutics Ltd ADR Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Kazia Therapeutics Ltd ADR across 27 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Kazia Therapeutics Ltd ADR cash conversion from operations.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Kazia Therapeutics Ltd ADR (1999–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Kazia Therapeutics Ltd ADR. Check Kazia Therapeutics Ltd ADR (KZIA) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.92x | $-13.28 Million | $14.36 Million | ▼ -204.9% |
| 2024 | -0.30x | $-9.58 Million | $31.60 Million | ▲ +67.9% |
| 2023 | -0.95x | $-15.16 Million | $16.03 Million | ▲ +26.9% |
| 2022 | -1.29x | $-22.76 Million | $17.61 Million | ▼ -187.0% |
| 2021 | -0.45x | $-9.11 Million | $20.24 Million | ▲ +54.3% |
| 2020 | -0.99x | $-8.81 Million | $8.94 Million | ▼ -2.9% |
| 2019 | -0.96x | $-6.71 Million | $7.01 Million | ▲ +1.2% |
| 2018 | -0.97x | $-8.66 Million | $8.93 Million | ▲ +10.4% |
| 2017 | -1.08x | $-11.43 Million | $10.57 Million | ▲ +85.7% |
| 2016 | -7.55x | $-11.98 Million | $1.59 Million | ▼ -133.1% |
| 2015 | -3.24x | $-5.76 Million | $1.78 Million | ▼ -84.3% |
| 2014 | -1.76x | $-5.71 Million | $3.25 Million | ▲ +22.6% |
| 2013 | -2.27x | $-8.79 Million | $3.87 Million | ▼ -19.7% |
| 2012 | -1.90x | $-7.35 Million | $3.87 Million | ▼ -81.2% |
| 2011 | -1.05x | $-8.70 Million | $8.31 Million | ▲ +61.4% |
| 2010 | -2.72x | $-16.61 Million | $6.11 Million | ▼ -19.6% |
| 2009 | -2.27x | $-20.60 Million | $9.07 Million | ▲ +12.3% |
| 2008 | -2.59x | $-20.10 Million | $7.76 Million | ▼ -19.3% |
| 2007 | -2.17x | $-14.63 Million | $6.74 Million | ▲ +2.1% |
| 2006 | -2.22x | $-14.44 Million | $6.52 Million | ▼ -21.0% |
| 2005 | -1.83x | $-12.76 Million | $6.97 Million | ▼ -409.1% |
| 2004 | -0.36x | $-10.48 Million | $29.12 Million | ▲ +48.3% |
| 2003 | -0.70x | $-5.83 Million | $8.38 Million | ▲ +18.2% |
| 2002 | -0.85x | $-6.68 Million | $7.86 Million | ▲ +54.7% |
| 2001 | -1.88x | $-34.18 Million | $18.22 Million | ▼ -22.9% |
| 2000 | -1.53x | $-18.75 Million | $12.29 Million | ▲ +39.0% |
| 1999 | -2.50x | $-20.97 Million | $8.39 Million | — |