Lakeland Industries Inc (LAKE) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Lakeland Industries Inc (LAKE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.04x as of October 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-3.09 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($86.23 Million) in one year. Explore long-term investment intensity of Lakeland Industries Inc to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Lakeland Industries Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Lakeland Industries Inc across 34 annual periods. Also explore Lakeland Industries Inc (LAKE) total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Lakeland Industries Inc (1992–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lakeland Industries Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Lakeland Industries Inc (LAKE) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.24x | $-15.88 Million | $65.91 Million | ▼ -166.9% |
| 2024 | 0.36x | $10.91 Million | $30.30 Million | ▲ +251.6% |
| 2023 | -0.24x | $-5.45 Million | $22.95 Million | ▼ -129.2% |
| 2022 | 0.81x | $12.78 Million | $15.69 Million | ▼ -65.9% |
| 2021 | 2.39x | $40.67 Million | $17.01 Million | ▲ +856.0% |
| 2020 | 0.25x | $3.59 Million | $14.35 Million | ▲ +61.1% |
| 2019 | 0.16x | $1.78 Million | $11.49 Million | ▲ +180.2% |
| 2018 | 0.06x | $648.00K | $11.69 Million | ▼ -93.7% |
| 2017 | 0.88x | $11.49 Million | $13.05 Million | ▲ +3627.6% |
| 2016 | -0.02x | $-518.00K | $20.74 Million | ▼ -122.5% |
| 2015 | 0.11x | $3.33 Million | $29.95 Million | ▲ +205.2% |
| 2014 | -0.11x | $-3.88 Million | $36.74 Million | ▼ -280.3% |
| 2013 | 0.06x | $2.19 Million | $37.33 Million | ▲ +38393.3% |
| 2012 | 0.00x | $-4.46K | $29.14 Million | ▲ +99.5% |
| 2011 | -0.03x | $-836.81K | $27.21 Million | ▼ -102.9% |
| 2010 | 1.06x | $18.68 Million | $17.60 Million | ▲ +2059.5% |
| 2009 | 0.05x | $1.64 Million | $33.30 Million | ▲ +136.5% |
| 2008 | -0.13x | $-2.12 Million | $15.75 Million | ▼ -113.3% |
| 2007 | 1.01x | $8.23 Million | $8.14 Million | ▲ +240.0% |
| 2006 | -0.72x | $-8.42 Million | $11.67 Million | ▼ -844.3% |
| 2005 | 0.10x | $459.21K | $4.73 Million | ▼ -1.0% |
| 2004 | 0.10x | $2.18 Million | $22.28 Million | ▲ +16.8% |
| 2003 | 0.08x | $1.80 Million | $21.46 Million | ▲ +304.8% |
| 2002 | -0.04x | $-970.04K | $23.69 Million | ▼ -319.3% |
| 2001 | 0.02x | $412.39K | $22.09 Million | ▲ +112.6% |
| 2000 | -0.15x | $-2.86 Million | $19.36 Million | ▼ -298.5% |
| 1999 | -0.04x | $-500.00K | $13.50 Million | ▲ +82.3% |
| 1998 | -0.21x | $-3.00 Million | $14.30 Million | ▼ -267.8% |
| 1997 | 0.13x | $1.10 Million | $8.80 Million | ▲ +182.0% |
| 1996 | -0.15x | $-1.60 Million | $10.50 Million | ▼ -1027.6% |
| 1995 | -0.01x | $-100.00K | $7.40 Million | ▲ +57.4% |
| 1994 | -0.03x | $-200.00K | $6.30 Million | ▼ -201.6% |
| 1993 | 0.03x | $200.00K | $6.40 Million | ▲ +164.6% |
| 1992 | -0.05x | $-300.00K | $6.20 Million | — |