Lakeland Industries Inc (LAKE) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Lakeland Industries Inc (LAKE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.04x as of October 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-3.09 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($86.23 Million) in one year. See how much free cash does Lakeland Industries Inc generate to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Lakeland Industries Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Lakeland Industries Inc across 34 annual periods. Also explore Lakeland Industries Inc annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Lakeland Industries Inc (1992–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lakeland Industries Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Lakeland Industries Inc market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.24x | $-15.88 Million | $65.91 Million | ▼ -166.9% |
| 2024 | 0.36x | $10.91 Million | $30.30 Million | ▲ +251.6% |
| 2023 | -0.24x | $-5.45 Million | $22.95 Million | ▼ -129.2% |
| 2022 | 0.81x | $12.78 Million | $15.69 Million | ▼ -65.9% |
| 2021 | 2.39x | $40.67 Million | $17.01 Million | ▲ +856.0% |
| 2020 | 0.25x | $3.59 Million | $14.35 Million | ▲ +61.1% |
| 2019 | 0.16x | $1.78 Million | $11.49 Million | ▲ +180.2% |
| 2018 | 0.06x | $648.00K | $11.69 Million | ▼ -93.7% |
| 2017 | 0.88x | $11.49 Million | $13.05 Million | ▲ +3627.6% |
| 2016 | -0.02x | $-518.00K | $20.74 Million | ▼ -122.5% |
| 2015 | 0.11x | $3.33 Million | $29.95 Million | ▲ +205.2% |
| 2014 | -0.11x | $-3.88 Million | $36.74 Million | ▼ -280.3% |
| 2013 | 0.06x | $2.19 Million | $37.33 Million | ▲ +38393.3% |
| 2012 | 0.00x | $-4.46K | $29.14 Million | ▲ +99.5% |
| 2011 | -0.03x | $-836.81K | $27.21 Million | ▼ -102.9% |
| 2010 | 1.06x | $18.68 Million | $17.60 Million | ▲ +2059.5% |
| 2009 | 0.05x | $1.64 Million | $33.30 Million | ▲ +136.5% |
| 2008 | -0.13x | $-2.12 Million | $15.75 Million | ▼ -113.3% |
| 2007 | 1.01x | $8.23 Million | $8.14 Million | ▲ +240.0% |
| 2006 | -0.72x | $-8.42 Million | $11.67 Million | ▼ -844.3% |
| 2005 | 0.10x | $459.21K | $4.73 Million | ▼ -1.0% |
| 2004 | 0.10x | $2.18 Million | $22.28 Million | ▲ +16.8% |
| 2003 | 0.08x | $1.80 Million | $21.46 Million | ▲ +304.8% |
| 2002 | -0.04x | $-970.04K | $23.69 Million | ▼ -319.3% |
| 2001 | 0.02x | $412.39K | $22.09 Million | ▲ +112.6% |
| 2000 | -0.15x | $-2.86 Million | $19.36 Million | ▼ -298.5% |
| 1999 | -0.04x | $-500.00K | $13.50 Million | ▲ +82.3% |
| 1998 | -0.21x | $-3.00 Million | $14.30 Million | ▼ -267.8% |
| 1997 | 0.13x | $1.10 Million | $8.80 Million | ▲ +182.0% |
| 1996 | -0.15x | $-1.60 Million | $10.50 Million | ▼ -1027.6% |
| 1995 | -0.01x | $-100.00K | $7.40 Million | ▲ +57.4% |
| 1994 | -0.03x | $-200.00K | $6.30 Million | ▼ -201.6% |
| 1993 | 0.03x | $200.00K | $6.40 Million | ▲ +164.6% |
| 1992 | -0.05x | $-300.00K | $6.20 Million | — |