Lakeland Industries Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Lakeland Industries Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Lakeland Industries Inc (LAKE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.04x as of October 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-3.09 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($86.23 Million) in one year. Check cash flow reinvestment rate of Lakeland Industries Inc to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Lakeland Industries Inc (1992–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Lakeland Industries Inc from 1992 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Lakeland Industries Inc across 34 annual periods. Check Lakeland Industries Inc cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Lakeland Industries Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1992–2025)
Lakeland Industries Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1992 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lakeland Industries Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Lakeland Industries Inc operating cash flow efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.24x | $-15.88 Million | $65.91 Million | ▼ -166.9% |
| 2024 | 0.36x | $10.91 Million | $30.30 Million | ▲ +251.6% |
| 2023 | -0.24x | $-5.45 Million | $22.95 Million | ▼ -129.2% |
| 2022 | 0.81x | $12.78 Million | $15.69 Million | ▼ -65.9% |
| 2021 | 2.39x | $40.67 Million | $17.01 Million | ▲ +856.0% |
| 2020 | 0.25x | $3.59 Million | $14.35 Million | ▲ +61.1% |
| 2019 | 0.16x | $1.78 Million | $11.49 Million | ▲ +180.2% |
| 2018 | 0.06x | $648.00K | $11.69 Million | ▼ -93.7% |
| 2017 | 0.88x | $11.49 Million | $13.05 Million | ▲ +3627.6% |
| 2016 | -0.02x | $-518.00K | $20.74 Million | ▼ -122.5% |
| 2015 | 0.11x | $3.33 Million | $29.95 Million | ▲ +205.2% |
| 2014 | -0.11x | $-3.88 Million | $36.74 Million | ▼ -280.3% |
| 2013 | 0.06x | $2.19 Million | $37.33 Million | ▲ +38393.3% |
| 2012 | 0.00x | $-4.46K | $29.14 Million | ▲ +99.5% |
| 2011 | -0.03x | $-836.81K | $27.21 Million | ▼ -102.9% |
| 2010 | 1.06x | $18.68 Million | $17.60 Million | ▲ +2059.5% |
| 2009 | 0.05x | $1.64 Million | $33.30 Million | ▲ +136.5% |
| 2008 | -0.13x | $-2.12 Million | $15.75 Million | ▼ -113.3% |
| 2007 | 1.01x | $8.23 Million | $8.14 Million | ▲ +240.0% |
| 2006 | -0.72x | $-8.42 Million | $11.67 Million | ▼ -844.3% |
| 2005 | 0.10x | $459.21K | $4.73 Million | ▼ -1.0% |
| 2004 | 0.10x | $2.18 Million | $22.28 Million | ▲ +16.8% |
| 2003 | 0.08x | $1.80 Million | $21.46 Million | ▲ +304.8% |
| 2002 | -0.04x | $-970.04K | $23.69 Million | ▼ -319.3% |
| 2001 | 0.02x | $412.39K | $22.09 Million | ▲ +112.6% |
| 2000 | -0.15x | $-2.86 Million | $19.36 Million | ▼ -298.5% |
| 1999 | -0.04x | $-500.00K | $13.50 Million | ▲ +82.3% |
| 1998 | -0.21x | $-3.00 Million | $14.30 Million | ▼ -267.8% |
| 1997 | 0.13x | $1.10 Million | $8.80 Million | ▲ +182.0% |
| 1996 | -0.15x | $-1.60 Million | $10.50 Million | ▼ -1027.6% |
| 1995 | -0.01x | $-100.00K | $7.40 Million | ▲ +57.4% |
| 1994 | -0.03x | $-200.00K | $6.30 Million | ▼ -201.6% |
| 1993 | 0.03x | $200.00K | $6.40 Million | ▲ +164.6% |
| 1992 | -0.05x | $-300.00K | $6.20 Million | — |