Lancaster Colony Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Lancaster Colony Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Lancaster Colony Corporation (LANC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.07x as of March 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $45.81 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($690.94 Million) in one year. Check earnings quality score of Lancaster Colony Corporation to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Lancaster Colony Corporation (1989–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Lancaster Colony Corporation from 1989 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Lancaster Colony Corporation across 36 annual periods. Check how aggressively does Lancaster Colony Corporation reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Lancaster Colony Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1989–2024)
Lancaster Colony Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1989 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lancaster Colony Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see LANC cash flow metrics.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.89x | $251.55 Million | $281.16 Million | ▼ -0.7% |
| 2023 | 0.90x | $225.90 Million | $250.73 Million | ▲ +117.4% |
| 2022 | 0.41x | $101.81 Million | $245.69 Million | ▼ -38.6% |
| 2021 | 0.67x | $174.19 Million | $258.14 Million | ▼ -17.0% |
| 2020 | 0.81x | $170.77 Million | $210.05 Million | ▼ -26.5% |
| 2019 | 1.11x | $197.60 Million | $178.53 Million | ▲ +4.8% |
| 2018 | 1.06x | $160.71 Million | $152.21 Million | ▲ +2.7% |
| 2017 | 1.03x | $144.35 Million | $140.43 Million | ▼ -12.7% |
| 2016 | 1.18x | $142.59 Million | $121.13 Million | ▲ +7.5% |
| 2015 | 1.10x | $132.77 Million | $121.24 Million | ▼ -6.7% |
| 2014 | 1.17x | $129.09 Million | $110.03 Million | ▲ +5.8% |
| 2013 | 1.11x | $131.68 Million | $118.74 Million | ▲ +7.2% |
| 2012 | 1.03x | $122.45 Million | $118.37 Million | ▼ -26.7% |
| 2011 | 1.41x | $147.45 Million | $104.55 Million | ▲ +33.0% |
| 2010 | 1.06x | $107.69 Million | $101.55 Million | ▼ -23.6% |
| 2009 | 1.39x | $133.16 Million | $95.92 Million | ▲ +139.4% |
| 2008 | 0.58x | $93.32 Million | $160.96 Million | ▼ -5.1% |
| 2007 | 0.61x | $94.16 Million | $154.19 Million | ▼ -15.9% |
| 2006 | 0.73x | $97.02 Million | $133.60 Million | ▼ -10.7% |
| 2005 | 0.81x | $116.68 Million | $143.55 Million | ▼ -14.4% |
| 2004 | 0.95x | $119.69 Million | $126.10 Million | ▼ -26.9% |
| 2003 | 1.30x | $155.99 Million | $120.05 Million | ▼ -4.8% |
| 2002 | 1.37x | $160.32 Million | $117.43 Million | ▲ +26.0% |
| 2001 | 1.08x | $126.21 Million | $116.45 Million | ▼ -1.8% |
| 2000 | 1.10x | $128.44 Million | $116.36 Million | ▲ +17.9% |
| 1999 | 0.94x | $126.50 Million | $135.10 Million | ▼ -7.3% |
| 1998 | 1.01x | $120.00 Million | $118.80 Million | ▲ +3.6% |
| 1997 | 0.98x | $113.50 Million | $116.40 Million | ▲ +29.0% |
| 1996 | 0.76x | $84.50 Million | $111.80 Million | ▲ +66.4% |
| 1995 | 0.45x | $46.70 Million | $102.80 Million | ▼ -11.8% |
| 1994 | 0.52x | $61.10 Million | $118.60 Million | ▼ -8.1% |
| 1993 | 0.56x | $61.70 Million | $110.10 Million | ▲ +8.7% |
| 1992 | 0.52x | $67.30 Million | $130.60 Million | ▲ +53.3% |
| 1991 | 0.34x | $49.60 Million | $147.60 Million | ▲ +72.9% |
| 1990 | 0.19x | $34.90 Million | $179.60 Million | ▼ -12.3% |
| 1989 | 0.22x | $33.70 Million | $152.10 Million | — |