Lancaster Colony Corporation (LANC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Lancaster Colony Corporation (LANC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.07x as of March 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $45.81 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($690.94 Million) in one year. Check cash flow reinvestment rate of Lancaster Colony Corporation to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Lancaster Colony Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Lancaster Colony Corporation across 36 annual periods. Also explore Lancaster Colony Corporation balance sheet assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Lancaster Colony Corporation (1989–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lancaster Colony Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see LANC market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.89x | $251.55 Million | $281.16 Million | ▼ -0.7% |
| 2023 | 0.90x | $225.90 Million | $250.73 Million | ▲ +117.4% |
| 2022 | 0.41x | $101.81 Million | $245.69 Million | ▼ -38.6% |
| 2021 | 0.67x | $174.19 Million | $258.14 Million | ▼ -17.0% |
| 2020 | 0.81x | $170.77 Million | $210.05 Million | ▼ -26.5% |
| 2019 | 1.11x | $197.60 Million | $178.53 Million | ▲ +4.8% |
| 2018 | 1.06x | $160.71 Million | $152.21 Million | ▲ +2.7% |
| 2017 | 1.03x | $144.35 Million | $140.43 Million | ▼ -12.7% |
| 2016 | 1.18x | $142.59 Million | $121.13 Million | ▲ +7.5% |
| 2015 | 1.10x | $132.77 Million | $121.24 Million | ▼ -6.7% |
| 2014 | 1.17x | $129.09 Million | $110.03 Million | ▲ +5.8% |
| 2013 | 1.11x | $131.68 Million | $118.74 Million | ▲ +7.2% |
| 2012 | 1.03x | $122.45 Million | $118.37 Million | ▼ -26.7% |
| 2011 | 1.41x | $147.45 Million | $104.55 Million | ▲ +33.0% |
| 2010 | 1.06x | $107.69 Million | $101.55 Million | ▼ -23.6% |
| 2009 | 1.39x | $133.16 Million | $95.92 Million | ▲ +139.4% |
| 2008 | 0.58x | $93.32 Million | $160.96 Million | ▼ -5.1% |
| 2007 | 0.61x | $94.16 Million | $154.19 Million | ▼ -15.9% |
| 2006 | 0.73x | $97.02 Million | $133.60 Million | ▼ -10.7% |
| 2005 | 0.81x | $116.68 Million | $143.55 Million | ▼ -14.4% |
| 2004 | 0.95x | $119.69 Million | $126.10 Million | ▼ -26.9% |
| 2003 | 1.30x | $155.99 Million | $120.05 Million | ▼ -4.8% |
| 2002 | 1.37x | $160.32 Million | $117.43 Million | ▲ +26.0% |
| 2001 | 1.08x | $126.21 Million | $116.45 Million | ▼ -1.8% |
| 2000 | 1.10x | $128.44 Million | $116.36 Million | ▲ +17.9% |
| 1999 | 0.94x | $126.50 Million | $135.10 Million | ▼ -7.3% |
| 1998 | 1.01x | $120.00 Million | $118.80 Million | ▲ +3.6% |
| 1997 | 0.98x | $113.50 Million | $116.40 Million | ▲ +29.0% |
| 1996 | 0.76x | $84.50 Million | $111.80 Million | ▲ +66.4% |
| 1995 | 0.45x | $46.70 Million | $102.80 Million | ▼ -11.8% |
| 1994 | 0.52x | $61.10 Million | $118.60 Million | ▼ -8.1% |
| 1993 | 0.56x | $61.70 Million | $110.10 Million | ▲ +8.7% |
| 1992 | 0.52x | $67.30 Million | $130.60 Million | ▲ +53.3% |
| 1991 | 0.34x | $49.60 Million | $147.60 Million | ▲ +72.9% |
| 1990 | 0.19x | $34.90 Million | $179.60 Million | ▼ -12.3% |
| 1989 | 0.22x | $33.70 Million | $152.10 Million | — |