Lancaster Colony Corporation (LANC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Lancaster Colony Corporation (LANC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.07x as of March 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $45.81 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($690.94 Million) in one year. See LANC free cash flow debt coverage to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Lancaster Colony Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Lancaster Colony Corporation across 36 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Lancaster Colony Corporation.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Lancaster Colony Corporation (1989–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lancaster Colony Corporation. Check Lancaster Colony Corporation (LANC) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.89x | $251.55 Million | $281.16 Million | ▼ -0.7% |
| 2023 | 0.90x | $225.90 Million | $250.73 Million | ▲ +117.4% |
| 2022 | 0.41x | $101.81 Million | $245.69 Million | ▼ -38.6% |
| 2021 | 0.67x | $174.19 Million | $258.14 Million | ▼ -17.0% |
| 2020 | 0.81x | $170.77 Million | $210.05 Million | ▼ -26.5% |
| 2019 | 1.11x | $197.60 Million | $178.53 Million | ▲ +4.8% |
| 2018 | 1.06x | $160.71 Million | $152.21 Million | ▲ +2.7% |
| 2017 | 1.03x | $144.35 Million | $140.43 Million | ▼ -12.7% |
| 2016 | 1.18x | $142.59 Million | $121.13 Million | ▲ +7.5% |
| 2015 | 1.10x | $132.77 Million | $121.24 Million | ▼ -6.7% |
| 2014 | 1.17x | $129.09 Million | $110.03 Million | ▲ +5.8% |
| 2013 | 1.11x | $131.68 Million | $118.74 Million | ▲ +7.2% |
| 2012 | 1.03x | $122.45 Million | $118.37 Million | ▼ -26.7% |
| 2011 | 1.41x | $147.45 Million | $104.55 Million | ▲ +33.0% |
| 2010 | 1.06x | $107.69 Million | $101.55 Million | ▼ -23.6% |
| 2009 | 1.39x | $133.16 Million | $95.92 Million | ▲ +139.4% |
| 2008 | 0.58x | $93.32 Million | $160.96 Million | ▼ -5.1% |
| 2007 | 0.61x | $94.16 Million | $154.19 Million | ▼ -15.9% |
| 2006 | 0.73x | $97.02 Million | $133.60 Million | ▼ -10.7% |
| 2005 | 0.81x | $116.68 Million | $143.55 Million | ▼ -14.4% |
| 2004 | 0.95x | $119.69 Million | $126.10 Million | ▼ -26.9% |
| 2003 | 1.30x | $155.99 Million | $120.05 Million | ▼ -4.8% |
| 2002 | 1.37x | $160.32 Million | $117.43 Million | ▲ +26.0% |
| 2001 | 1.08x | $126.21 Million | $116.45 Million | ▼ -1.8% |
| 2000 | 1.10x | $128.44 Million | $116.36 Million | ▲ +17.9% |
| 1999 | 0.94x | $126.50 Million | $135.10 Million | ▼ -7.3% |
| 1998 | 1.01x | $120.00 Million | $118.80 Million | ▲ +3.6% |
| 1997 | 0.98x | $113.50 Million | $116.40 Million | ▲ +29.0% |
| 1996 | 0.76x | $84.50 Million | $111.80 Million | ▲ +66.4% |
| 1995 | 0.45x | $46.70 Million | $102.80 Million | ▼ -11.8% |
| 1994 | 0.52x | $61.10 Million | $118.60 Million | ▼ -8.1% |
| 1993 | 0.56x | $61.70 Million | $110.10 Million | ▲ +8.7% |
| 1992 | 0.52x | $67.30 Million | $130.60 Million | ▲ +53.3% |
| 1991 | 0.34x | $49.60 Million | $147.60 Million | ▲ +72.9% |
| 1990 | 0.19x | $34.90 Million | $179.60 Million | ▼ -12.3% |
| 1989 | 0.22x | $33.70 Million | $152.10 Million | — |