Lincoln Electric Holdings Inc (LECO) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Lincoln Electric Holdings Inc (LECO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $102.17 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.39 Billion) in one year. See Lincoln Electric Holdings Inc free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Lincoln Electric Holdings Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Lincoln Electric Holdings Inc across 32 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Lincoln Electric Holdings Inc to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Lincoln Electric Holdings Inc (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lincoln Electric Holdings Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Lincoln Electric Holdings Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.29x | $661.17 Million | $2.31 Billion | ▲ +4.9% |
| 2024 | 0.27x | $598.98 Million | $2.19 Billion | ▼ -15.4% |
| 2023 | 0.32x | $667.54 Million | $2.07 Billion | ▲ +80.7% |
| 2022 | 0.18x | $383.39 Million | $2.15 Billion | ▼ -15.4% |
| 2021 | 0.21x | $365.06 Million | $1.73 Billion | ▼ -8.4% |
| 2020 | 0.23x | $351.36 Million | $1.52 Billion | ▼ -11.3% |
| 2019 | 0.26x | $403.19 Million | $1.55 Billion | ▲ +15.4% |
| 2018 | 0.23x | $329.15 Million | $1.46 Billion | ▼ -0.9% |
| 2017 | 0.23x | $334.85 Million | $1.47 Billion | ▼ -7.8% |
| 2016 | 0.25x | $303.40 Million | $1.23 Billion | ▼ -32.5% |
| 2015 | 0.36x | $310.86 Million | $851.72 Million | ▼ -40.6% |
| 2014 | 0.61x | $401.70 Million | $653.43 Million | ▲ +12.7% |
| 2013 | 0.55x | $338.89 Million | $621.18 Million | ▲ +21.9% |
| 2012 | 0.45x | $327.48 Million | $731.54 Million | ▲ +81.3% |
| 2011 | 0.25x | $193.52 Million | $783.53 Million | ▼ -0.2% |
| 2010 | 0.25x | $156.98 Million | $634.31 Million | ▼ -38.7% |
| 2009 | 0.40x | $250.35 Million | $619.62 Million | ▲ +13.5% |
| 2008 | 0.36x | $257.45 Million | $723.49 Million | ▼ -20.5% |
| 2007 | 0.45x | $249.83 Million | $558.08 Million | ▲ +104.3% |
| 2006 | 0.22x | $118.68 Million | $541.60 Million | ▼ -4.7% |
| 2005 | 0.23x | $117.02 Million | $508.87 Million | ▲ +116.2% |
| 2004 | 0.11x | $51.26 Million | $481.89 Million | ▼ -49.9% |
| 2003 | 0.21x | $95.69 Million | $450.36 Million | ▼ -3.2% |
| 2002 | 0.22x | $103.60 Million | $472.12 Million | ▼ -48.4% |
| 2001 | 0.43x | $120.23 Million | $282.61 Million | ▲ +20.8% |
| 2000 | 0.35x | $120.83 Million | $342.98 Million | ▲ +40.7% |
| 1999 | 0.25x | $81.10 Million | $323.90 Million | ▼ -40.1% |
| 1998 | 0.42x | $122.10 Million | $292.00 Million | ▲ +29.3% |
| 1997 | 0.32x | $88.90 Million | $275.00 Million | ▼ -23.4% |
| 1996 | 0.42x | $107.80 Million | $255.40 Million | ▲ +82.0% |
| 1995 | 0.23x | $65.50 Million | $282.40 Million | ▲ +20.2% |
| 1994 | 0.19x | $68.70 Million | $356.00 Million | — |