Lincoln Electric Holdings Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Lincoln Electric Holdings Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Lincoln Electric Holdings Inc (LECO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $102.17 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.39 Billion) in one year. Check cash flow quality index of Lincoln Electric Holdings Inc to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Lincoln Electric Holdings Inc (1994–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Lincoln Electric Holdings Inc from 1994 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Lincoln Electric Holdings Inc across 32 annual periods. Check Lincoln Electric Holdings Inc cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Lincoln Electric Holdings Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1994–2025)
Lincoln Electric Holdings Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1994 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lincoln Electric Holdings Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Lincoln Electric Holdings Inc cash conversion from operations.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.29x | $661.17 Million | $2.31 Billion | ▲ +4.9% |
| 2024 | 0.27x | $598.98 Million | $2.19 Billion | ▼ -15.4% |
| 2023 | 0.32x | $667.54 Million | $2.07 Billion | ▲ +80.7% |
| 2022 | 0.18x | $383.39 Million | $2.15 Billion | ▼ -15.4% |
| 2021 | 0.21x | $365.06 Million | $1.73 Billion | ▼ -8.4% |
| 2020 | 0.23x | $351.36 Million | $1.52 Billion | ▼ -11.3% |
| 2019 | 0.26x | $403.19 Million | $1.55 Billion | ▲ +15.4% |
| 2018 | 0.23x | $329.15 Million | $1.46 Billion | ▼ -0.9% |
| 2017 | 0.23x | $334.85 Million | $1.47 Billion | ▼ -7.8% |
| 2016 | 0.25x | $303.40 Million | $1.23 Billion | ▼ -32.5% |
| 2015 | 0.36x | $310.86 Million | $851.72 Million | ▼ -40.6% |
| 2014 | 0.61x | $401.70 Million | $653.43 Million | ▲ +12.7% |
| 2013 | 0.55x | $338.89 Million | $621.18 Million | ▲ +21.9% |
| 2012 | 0.45x | $327.48 Million | $731.54 Million | ▲ +81.3% |
| 2011 | 0.25x | $193.52 Million | $783.53 Million | ▼ -0.2% |
| 2010 | 0.25x | $156.98 Million | $634.31 Million | ▼ -38.7% |
| 2009 | 0.40x | $250.35 Million | $619.62 Million | ▲ +13.5% |
| 2008 | 0.36x | $257.45 Million | $723.49 Million | ▼ -20.5% |
| 2007 | 0.45x | $249.83 Million | $558.08 Million | ▲ +104.3% |
| 2006 | 0.22x | $118.68 Million | $541.60 Million | ▼ -4.7% |
| 2005 | 0.23x | $117.02 Million | $508.87 Million | ▲ +116.2% |
| 2004 | 0.11x | $51.26 Million | $481.89 Million | ▼ -49.9% |
| 2003 | 0.21x | $95.69 Million | $450.36 Million | ▼ -3.2% |
| 2002 | 0.22x | $103.60 Million | $472.12 Million | ▼ -48.4% |
| 2001 | 0.43x | $120.23 Million | $282.61 Million | ▲ +20.8% |
| 2000 | 0.35x | $120.83 Million | $342.98 Million | ▲ +40.7% |
| 1999 | 0.25x | $81.10 Million | $323.90 Million | ▼ -40.1% |
| 1998 | 0.42x | $122.10 Million | $292.00 Million | ▲ +29.3% |
| 1997 | 0.32x | $88.90 Million | $275.00 Million | ▼ -23.4% |
| 1996 | 0.42x | $107.80 Million | $255.40 Million | ▲ +82.0% |
| 1995 | 0.23x | $65.50 Million | $282.40 Million | ▲ +20.2% |
| 1994 | 0.19x | $68.70 Million | $356.00 Million | — |