Lincoln Electric Holdings Inc (LECO) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Lincoln Electric Holdings Inc (LECO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $102.17 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.39 Billion) in one year. Explore long-term investment intensity of Lincoln Electric Holdings Inc to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Lincoln Electric Holdings Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Lincoln Electric Holdings Inc across 32 annual periods. Also explore LECO total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Lincoln Electric Holdings Inc (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lincoln Electric Holdings Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Lincoln Electric Holdings Inc market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.29x | $661.17 Million | $2.31 Billion | ▲ +4.9% |
| 2024 | 0.27x | $598.98 Million | $2.19 Billion | ▼ -15.4% |
| 2023 | 0.32x | $667.54 Million | $2.07 Billion | ▲ +80.7% |
| 2022 | 0.18x | $383.39 Million | $2.15 Billion | ▼ -15.4% |
| 2021 | 0.21x | $365.06 Million | $1.73 Billion | ▼ -8.4% |
| 2020 | 0.23x | $351.36 Million | $1.52 Billion | ▼ -11.3% |
| 2019 | 0.26x | $403.19 Million | $1.55 Billion | ▲ +15.4% |
| 2018 | 0.23x | $329.15 Million | $1.46 Billion | ▼ -0.9% |
| 2017 | 0.23x | $334.85 Million | $1.47 Billion | ▼ -7.8% |
| 2016 | 0.25x | $303.40 Million | $1.23 Billion | ▼ -32.5% |
| 2015 | 0.36x | $310.86 Million | $851.72 Million | ▼ -40.6% |
| 2014 | 0.61x | $401.70 Million | $653.43 Million | ▲ +12.7% |
| 2013 | 0.55x | $338.89 Million | $621.18 Million | ▲ +21.9% |
| 2012 | 0.45x | $327.48 Million | $731.54 Million | ▲ +81.3% |
| 2011 | 0.25x | $193.52 Million | $783.53 Million | ▼ -0.2% |
| 2010 | 0.25x | $156.98 Million | $634.31 Million | ▼ -38.7% |
| 2009 | 0.40x | $250.35 Million | $619.62 Million | ▲ +13.5% |
| 2008 | 0.36x | $257.45 Million | $723.49 Million | ▼ -20.5% |
| 2007 | 0.45x | $249.83 Million | $558.08 Million | ▲ +104.3% |
| 2006 | 0.22x | $118.68 Million | $541.60 Million | ▼ -4.7% |
| 2005 | 0.23x | $117.02 Million | $508.87 Million | ▲ +116.2% |
| 2004 | 0.11x | $51.26 Million | $481.89 Million | ▼ -49.9% |
| 2003 | 0.21x | $95.69 Million | $450.36 Million | ▼ -3.2% |
| 2002 | 0.22x | $103.60 Million | $472.12 Million | ▼ -48.4% |
| 2001 | 0.43x | $120.23 Million | $282.61 Million | ▲ +20.8% |
| 2000 | 0.35x | $120.83 Million | $342.98 Million | ▲ +40.7% |
| 1999 | 0.25x | $81.10 Million | $323.90 Million | ▼ -40.1% |
| 1998 | 0.42x | $122.10 Million | $292.00 Million | ▲ +29.3% |
| 1997 | 0.32x | $88.90 Million | $275.00 Million | ▼ -23.4% |
| 1996 | 0.42x | $107.80 Million | $255.40 Million | ▲ +82.0% |
| 1995 | 0.23x | $65.50 Million | $282.40 Million | ▲ +20.2% |
| 1994 | 0.19x | $68.70 Million | $356.00 Million | — |