Littelfuse Inc (LFUS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Littelfuse Inc (LFUS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.06x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $78.20 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.34 Billion) in one year. See LFUS FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Littelfuse Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Littelfuse Inc across 34 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Littelfuse Inc to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Littelfuse Inc (1992–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Littelfuse Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Littelfuse Inc stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.28x | $433.76 Million | $1.53 Billion | ▲ +13.9% |
| 2024 | 0.25x | $367.62 Million | $1.48 Billion | ▼ -17.6% |
| 2023 | 0.30x | $457.39 Million | $1.51 Billion | ▲ +21.7% |
| 2022 | 0.25x | $419.72 Million | $1.69 Billion | ▼ -16.4% |
| 2021 | 0.30x | $373.34 Million | $1.26 Billion | ▲ +31.0% |
| 2020 | 0.23x | $258.03 Million | $1.14 Billion | ▼ -1.7% |
| 2019 | 0.23x | $245.33 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▼ -21.1% |
| 2018 | 0.29x | $331.83 Million | $1.14 Billion | ▼ -11.8% |
| 2017 | 0.33x | $269.17 Million | $812.55 Million | ▲ +24.4% |
| 2016 | 0.27x | $180.13 Million | $676.26 Million | ▼ -48.5% |
| 2015 | 0.52x | $165.83 Million | $320.78 Million | ▲ +15.8% |
| 2014 | 0.45x | $153.14 Million | $343.16 Million | ▲ +26.3% |
| 2013 | 0.35x | $117.37 Million | $332.25 Million | ▼ -42.2% |
| 2012 | 0.61x | $116.17 Million | $190.17 Million | ▼ -10.3% |
| 2011 | 0.68x | $120.75 Million | $177.32 Million | ▲ +10.2% |
| 2010 | 0.62x | $104.07 Million | $168.47 Million | ▲ +222.2% |
| 2009 | 0.19x | $29.63 Million | $154.53 Million | ▼ -9.6% |
| 2008 | 0.21x | $43.47 Million | $205.08 Million | ▼ -51.3% |
| 2007 | 0.43x | $59.94 Million | $137.81 Million | ▼ -13.4% |
| 2006 | 0.50x | $80.92 Million | $161.16 Million | ▲ +66.8% |
| 2005 | 0.30x | $38.14 Million | $126.72 Million | ▼ -13.3% |
| 2004 | 0.35x | $52.98 Million | $152.59 Million | ▼ -30.9% |
| 2003 | 0.50x | $49.95 Million | $99.37 Million | ▲ +13.2% |
| 2002 | 0.44x | $40.76 Million | $91.77 Million | ▲ +4.2% |
| 2001 | 0.43x | $40.31 Million | $94.60 Million | ▼ -5.8% |
| 2000 | 0.45x | $48.69 Million | $107.65 Million | ▲ +61.3% |
| 1999 | 0.28x | $38.90 Million | $138.70 Million | ▼ -10.1% |
| 1998 | 0.31x | $39.30 Million | $126.00 Million | ▼ -16.7% |
| 1997 | 0.37x | $36.80 Million | $98.30 Million | ▼ -5.4% |
| 1996 | 0.40x | $40.00 Million | $101.10 Million | ▲ +3.1% |
| 1995 | 0.38x | $35.00 Million | $91.20 Million | ▲ +36.2% |
| 1994 | 0.28x | $29.20 Million | $103.60 Million | ▲ +5.8% |
| 1993 | 0.27x | $30.40 Million | $114.10 Million | ▲ +36.7% |
| 1992 | 0.19x | $25.20 Million | $129.30 Million | — |