Lifevantage Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Lifevantage Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Lifevantage Corporation (LFVN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.17x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $4.77 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($28.52 Million) in one year. Check LFVN cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Lifevantage Corporation (1997–2026)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Lifevantage Corporation from 1997 to 2026. Historical debt coverage capacity for Lifevantage Corporation across 29 annual periods. Check Lifevantage Corporation (LFVN) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Lifevantage Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1997–2026)
Lifevantage Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1997 to 2026. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lifevantage Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see LFVN cash generation efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.36x | $10.24 Million | $28.52 Million | ▲ +12.8% |
| 2025 | 0.32x | $11.88 Million | $37.32 Million | ▼ -10.5% |
| 2024 | 0.36x | $12.20 Million | $34.31 Million | ▲ +63.9% |
| 2023 | 0.22x | $6.83 Million | $31.47 Million | ▲ +6.8% |
| 2022 | 0.20x | $7.96 Million | $39.19 Million | ▲ +7.0% |
| 2021 | 0.19x | $7.96 Million | $41.92 Million | ▼ -73.5% |
| 2020 | 0.72x | $18.33 Million | $25.62 Million | ▲ +12.9% |
| 2019 | 0.63x | $17.79 Million | $28.07 Million | ▲ +39.6% |
| 2018 | 0.45x | $13.26 Million | $29.20 Million | ▲ +111.4% |
| 2017 | 0.21x | $6.60 Million | $30.72 Million | ▲ +35.6% |
| 2016 | 0.16x | $6.04 Million | $38.13 Million | ▼ -55.0% |
| 2015 | 0.35x | $13.22 Million | $37.55 Million | ▲ +45.4% |
| 2014 | 0.24x | $12.11 Million | $50.01 Million | ▼ -51.1% |
| 2013 | 0.50x | $10.66 Million | $21.54 Million | ▼ -58.5% |
| 2012 | 1.19x | $19.39 Million | $16.24 Million | ▲ +749.3% |
| 2011 | 0.14x | $4.68 Million | $33.31 Million | ▲ +170.0% |
| 2010 | -0.20x | $-4.50 Million | $22.40 Million | ▲ +51.5% |
| 2009 | -0.41x | $-5.21 Million | $12.57 Million | ▲ +23.6% |
| 2008 | -0.54x | $-747.78K | $1.38 Million | ▲ +79.2% |
| 2007 | -2.60x | $-3.13 Million | $1.20 Million | ▼ -515.4% |
| 2006 | -0.42x | $-915.63K | $2.16 Million | ▲ +87.4% |
| 2005 | -3.37x | $-2.91 Million | $865.20K | ▼ -1505.3% |
| 2004 | -0.21x | $-3.04K | $14.47K | ▲ +85.8% |
| 2003 | -1.48x | $-9.99K | $6.78K | ▲ +86.9% |
| 2002 | -11.30x | $-15.02K | $1.33K | ▼ -112.9% |
| 2000 | -5.31x | $-127.38K | $24.00K | ▼ -102617.2% |
| 1999 | -0.01x | $-807.00 | $156.18K | ▼ -1044.9% |
| 1998 | 0.00x | $111.00 | $202.97K | ▲ +107.1% |
| 1997 | -0.01x | $-1.38K | $178.82K | — |