Lifevantage Corporation (LFVN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Lifevantage Corporation (LFVN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.17x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $4.77 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($28.52 Million) in one year. See financial agility of Lifevantage Corporation to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Lifevantage Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2026)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Lifevantage Corporation across 29 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Lifevantage Corporation operating cash flow efficiency.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Lifevantage Corporation (1997–2026)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lifevantage Corporation. Check LFVN cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.36x | $10.24 Million | $28.52 Million | ▲ +12.8% |
| 2025 | 0.32x | $11.88 Million | $37.32 Million | ▼ -10.5% |
| 2024 | 0.36x | $12.20 Million | $34.31 Million | ▲ +63.9% |
| 2023 | 0.22x | $6.83 Million | $31.47 Million | ▲ +6.8% |
| 2022 | 0.20x | $7.96 Million | $39.19 Million | ▲ +7.0% |
| 2021 | 0.19x | $7.96 Million | $41.92 Million | ▼ -73.5% |
| 2020 | 0.72x | $18.33 Million | $25.62 Million | ▲ +12.9% |
| 2019 | 0.63x | $17.79 Million | $28.07 Million | ▲ +39.6% |
| 2018 | 0.45x | $13.26 Million | $29.20 Million | ▲ +111.4% |
| 2017 | 0.21x | $6.60 Million | $30.72 Million | ▲ +35.6% |
| 2016 | 0.16x | $6.04 Million | $38.13 Million | ▼ -55.0% |
| 2015 | 0.35x | $13.22 Million | $37.55 Million | ▲ +45.4% |
| 2014 | 0.24x | $12.11 Million | $50.01 Million | ▼ -51.1% |
| 2013 | 0.50x | $10.66 Million | $21.54 Million | ▼ -58.5% |
| 2012 | 1.19x | $19.39 Million | $16.24 Million | ▲ +749.3% |
| 2011 | 0.14x | $4.68 Million | $33.31 Million | ▲ +170.0% |
| 2010 | -0.20x | $-4.50 Million | $22.40 Million | ▲ +51.5% |
| 2009 | -0.41x | $-5.21 Million | $12.57 Million | ▲ +23.6% |
| 2008 | -0.54x | $-747.78K | $1.38 Million | ▲ +79.2% |
| 2007 | -2.60x | $-3.13 Million | $1.20 Million | ▼ -515.4% |
| 2006 | -0.42x | $-915.63K | $2.16 Million | ▲ +87.4% |
| 2005 | -3.37x | $-2.91 Million | $865.20K | ▼ -1505.3% |
| 2004 | -0.21x | $-3.04K | $14.47K | ▲ +85.8% |
| 2003 | -1.48x | $-9.99K | $6.78K | ▲ +86.9% |
| 2002 | -11.30x | $-15.02K | $1.33K | ▼ -112.9% |
| 2000 | -5.31x | $-127.38K | $24.00K | ▼ -102617.2% |
| 1999 | -0.01x | $-807.00 | $156.18K | ▼ -1044.9% |
| 1998 | 0.00x | $111.00 | $202.97K | ▲ +107.1% |
| 1997 | -0.01x | $-1.38K | $178.82K | — |