Lindblad Expeditions Holdings Inc (LIND) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of June 2026: 0.05x

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings Inc (LIND) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $59.05 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.20 Billion) in one year. See LIND free cash flow debt coverage to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.05x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

$59.05 Million
USD

Total Liabilities

$1.20 Billion
USD

Data as of

Jun 2026
Most recent filing

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2011–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Lindblad Expeditions Holdings Inc across 15 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Lindblad Expeditions Holdings Inc cash conversion from operations.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Lindblad Expeditions Holdings Inc (2011–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lindblad Expeditions Holdings Inc. Check Lindblad Expeditions Holdings Inc cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (USD) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 0.10x $111.58 Million $1.13 Billion ▲ +9.0%
2024 0.09x $92.36 Million $1.02 Billion ▲ +235.5%
2023 0.03x $25.44 Million $945.06 Million ▲ +1167.5%
2022 0.00x $-2.20 Million $873.62 Million ▼ -106.3%
2021 0.04x $32.49 Million $811.55 Million ▲ +127.4%
2020 -0.15x $-92.26 Million $631.17 Million ▼ -195.6%
2019 0.15x $62.58 Million $409.30 Million ▼ -4.8%
2018 0.16x $56.36 Million $350.86 Million ▼ -5.4%
2017 0.17x $52.92 Million $311.72 Million ▲ +56.0%
2016 0.11x $31.43 Million $288.72 Million ▼ -27.7%
2015 0.15x $40.30 Million $267.69 Million ▲ +117.9%
2014 -0.84x $-764.80K $911.56K ▲ +72.2%
2013 -3.02x $-595.65K $197.04K ▼ -12812.9%
2012 -0.02x $-3.51K $150.02K ▲ +5.4%
2011 -0.02x $-3.71K $150.02K
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.