Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc (LOAN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.06x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.26 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($21.15 Million) in one year. Check Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc (LOAN) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc (1998–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc from 1998 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc across 28 annual periods. Check cash flow reinvestment rate of Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1998–2025)
Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1998 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 256.04x | $4.93 Billion | $19.25 Million | ▲ +127945.4% |
| 2024 | 0.20x | $4.93 Million | $24.66 Million | ▲ +19.4% |
| 2023 | 0.17x | $5.61 Million | $33.50 Million | ▲ +8.3% |
| 2022 | 0.15x | $5.17 Million | $33.42 Million | ▼ -19.9% |
| 2021 | 0.19x | $4.60 Million | $23.82 Million | ▲ +27.5% |
| 2020 | 0.15x | $4.22 Million | $27.88 Million | ▼ -23.1% |
| 2019 | 0.20x | $4.43 Million | $22.50 Million | ▲ +7.6% |
| 2018 | 0.18x | $4.36 Million | $23.82 Million | ▲ +25.0% |
| 2017 | 0.15x | $3.46 Million | $23.65 Million | ▼ -37.5% |
| 2016 | 0.23x | $3.05 Million | $13.02 Million | ▲ +53.7% |
| 2015 | 0.15x | $2.12 Million | $13.91 Million | ▲ +26.2% |
| 2014 | 0.12x | $1.28 Million | $10.58 Million | ▲ +11.2% |
| 2013 | 0.11x | $785.76K | $7.23 Million | ▲ +19.4% |
| 2012 | 0.09x | $533.40K | $5.86 Million | ▼ -52.2% |
| 2011 | 0.19x | $381.30K | $2.00 Million | ▼ -5.2% |
| 2010 | 0.20x | $223.88K | $1.11 Million | ▼ -85.8% |
| 2009 | 1.42x | $485.61K | $342.70K | ▼ -31.2% |
| 2008 | 2.06x | $400.96K | $194.59K | ▲ +185.3% |
| 2007 | -2.42x | $-486.73K | $201.40K | ▼ -496.3% |
| 2006 | -0.41x | $-453.13K | $1.12 Million | ▼ -122.4% |
| 2005 | -0.18x | $-676.15K | $3.71 Million | ▼ -160.2% |
| 2004 | -0.07x | $-359.47K | $5.13 Million | ▼ -175.0% |
| 2003 | 0.09x | $600.57K | $6.43 Million | ▲ +163.8% |
| 2002 | 0.04x | $234.47K | $6.62 Million | ▲ +168.8% |
| 2001 | -0.05x | $-232.22K | $4.51 Million | ▼ -452.2% |
| 2000 | 0.01x | $65.92K | $4.51 Million | ▼ -89.2% |
| 1999 | 0.14x | $500.00K | $3.70 Million | ▼ -15.5% |
| 1998 | 0.16x | $400.00K | $2.50 Million | — |