Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc (LOAN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc (LOAN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.06x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.26 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($21.15 Million) in one year. See how financially flexible is Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc across 28 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc. Check LOAN operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 256.04x | $4.93 Billion | $19.25 Million | ▲ +127945.4% |
| 2024 | 0.20x | $4.93 Million | $24.66 Million | ▲ +19.4% |
| 2023 | 0.17x | $5.61 Million | $33.50 Million | ▲ +8.3% |
| 2022 | 0.15x | $5.17 Million | $33.42 Million | ▼ -19.9% |
| 2021 | 0.19x | $4.60 Million | $23.82 Million | ▲ +27.5% |
| 2020 | 0.15x | $4.22 Million | $27.88 Million | ▼ -23.1% |
| 2019 | 0.20x | $4.43 Million | $22.50 Million | ▲ +7.6% |
| 2018 | 0.18x | $4.36 Million | $23.82 Million | ▲ +25.0% |
| 2017 | 0.15x | $3.46 Million | $23.65 Million | ▼ -37.5% |
| 2016 | 0.23x | $3.05 Million | $13.02 Million | ▲ +53.7% |
| 2015 | 0.15x | $2.12 Million | $13.91 Million | ▲ +26.2% |
| 2014 | 0.12x | $1.28 Million | $10.58 Million | ▲ +11.2% |
| 2013 | 0.11x | $785.76K | $7.23 Million | ▲ +19.4% |
| 2012 | 0.09x | $533.40K | $5.86 Million | ▼ -52.2% |
| 2011 | 0.19x | $381.30K | $2.00 Million | ▼ -5.2% |
| 2010 | 0.20x | $223.88K | $1.11 Million | ▼ -85.8% |
| 2009 | 1.42x | $485.61K | $342.70K | ▼ -31.2% |
| 2008 | 2.06x | $400.96K | $194.59K | ▲ +185.3% |
| 2007 | -2.42x | $-486.73K | $201.40K | ▼ -496.3% |
| 2006 | -0.41x | $-453.13K | $1.12 Million | ▼ -122.4% |
| 2005 | -0.18x | $-676.15K | $3.71 Million | ▼ -160.2% |
| 2004 | -0.07x | $-359.47K | $5.13 Million | ▼ -175.0% |
| 2003 | 0.09x | $600.57K | $6.43 Million | ▲ +163.8% |
| 2002 | 0.04x | $234.47K | $6.62 Million | ▲ +168.8% |
| 2001 | -0.05x | $-232.22K | $4.51 Million | ▼ -452.2% |
| 2000 | 0.01x | $65.92K | $4.51 Million | ▼ -89.2% |
| 1999 | 0.14x | $500.00K | $3.70 Million | ▼ -15.5% |
| 1998 | 0.16x | $400.00K | $2.50 Million | — |