Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc (LOAN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc (LOAN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.02 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($19.25 Million) in one year. See Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc across 28 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 256.04x | $4.93 Billion | $19.25 Million | ▲ +127945.4% |
| 2024 | 0.20x | $4.93 Million | $24.66 Million | ▲ +19.4% |
| 2023 | 0.17x | $5.61 Million | $33.50 Million | ▲ +8.3% |
| 2022 | 0.15x | $5.17 Million | $33.42 Million | ▼ -19.9% |
| 2021 | 0.19x | $4.60 Million | $23.82 Million | ▲ +27.5% |
| 2020 | 0.15x | $4.22 Million | $27.88 Million | ▼ -23.1% |
| 2019 | 0.20x | $4.43 Million | $22.50 Million | ▲ +7.6% |
| 2018 | 0.18x | $4.36 Million | $23.82 Million | ▲ +25.0% |
| 2017 | 0.15x | $3.46 Million | $23.65 Million | ▼ -37.5% |
| 2016 | 0.23x | $3.05 Million | $13.02 Million | ▲ +53.7% |
| 2015 | 0.15x | $2.12 Million | $13.91 Million | ▲ +26.2% |
| 2014 | 0.12x | $1.28 Million | $10.58 Million | ▲ +11.2% |
| 2013 | 0.11x | $785.76K | $7.23 Million | ▲ +19.4% |
| 2012 | 0.09x | $533.40K | $5.86 Million | ▼ -52.2% |
| 2011 | 0.19x | $381.30K | $2.00 Million | ▼ -5.2% |
| 2010 | 0.20x | $223.88K | $1.11 Million | ▼ -85.8% |
| 2009 | 1.42x | $485.61K | $342.70K | ▼ -31.2% |
| 2008 | 2.06x | $400.96K | $194.59K | ▲ +185.3% |
| 2007 | -2.42x | $-486.73K | $201.40K | ▼ -496.3% |
| 2006 | -0.41x | $-453.13K | $1.12 Million | ▼ -122.4% |
| 2005 | -0.18x | $-676.15K | $3.71 Million | ▼ -160.2% |
| 2004 | -0.07x | $-359.47K | $5.13 Million | ▼ -175.0% |
| 2003 | 0.09x | $600.57K | $6.43 Million | ▲ +163.8% |
| 2002 | 0.04x | $234.47K | $6.62 Million | ▲ +168.8% |
| 2001 | -0.05x | $-232.22K | $4.51 Million | ▼ -452.2% |
| 2000 | 0.01x | $65.92K | $4.51 Million | ▼ -89.2% |
| 1999 | 0.14x | $500.00K | $3.70 Million | ▼ -15.5% |
| 1998 | 0.16x | $400.00K | $2.50 Million | — |