Lesaka Technologies Inc (LSAK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Lesaka Technologies Inc (LSAK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $16.87 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($6.81 Billion) in one year. See Lesaka Technologies Inc leverage flexibility ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Lesaka Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2000–2026)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Lesaka Technologies Inc across 27 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Lesaka Technologies Inc generate cash.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Lesaka Technologies Inc (2000–2026)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lesaka Technologies Inc. Check LSAK operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.01x | $52.44 Million | $6.81 Billion | ▲ +133.1% |
| 2025 | -0.02x | $-9.12 Million | $392.33 Million | ▼ -124.5% |
| 2024 | 0.09x | $28.79 Million | $303.16 Million | ▲ +6462.3% |
| 2023 | 0.00x | $410.00K | $283.33 Million | ▲ +101.3% |
| 2022 | -0.11x | $-37.20 Million | $342.22 Million | ▲ +87.5% |
| 2021 | -0.87x | $-58.37 Million | $67.37 Million | ▼ -47.7% |
| 2020 | -0.59x | $-46.05 Million | $78.49 Million | ▼ -3133.7% |
| 2019 | -0.02x | $-4.46 Million | $245.84 Million | ▼ -105.1% |
| 2018 | 0.36x | $132.60 Million | $373.19 Million | ▲ +171.6% |
| 2017 | 0.13x | $97.16 Million | $742.75 Million | ▼ -25.9% |
| 2016 | 0.18x | $116.55 Million | $660.28 Million | ▲ +5.4% |
| 2015 | 0.17x | $135.26 Million | $807.64 Million | ▲ +309.9% |
| 2014 | 0.04x | $37.15 Million | $909.20 Million | ▼ -31.6% |
| 2013 | 0.06x | $55.92 Million | $936.35 Million | ▲ +78.8% |
| 2012 | 0.03x | $20.41 Million | $611.07 Million | ▼ -77.0% |
| 2011 | 0.15x | $66.22 Million | $455.62 Million | ▼ -60.9% |
| 2010 | 0.37x | $68.68 Million | $184.79 Million | ▼ -56.9% |
| 2009 | 0.86x | $106.77 Million | $123.73 Million | ▼ -17.4% |
| 2008 | 1.04x | $118.76 Million | $113.74 Million | ▲ +51.5% |
| 2007 | 0.69x | $65.47 Million | $95.02 Million | ▼ -44.6% |
| 2006 | 1.24x | $75.78 Million | $60.97 Million | ▲ +45.8% |
| 2005 | 0.85x | $38.14 Million | $44.75 Million | ▲ +16.0% |
| 2004 | 0.73x | $41.90 Million | $57.04 Million | ▲ +787.0% |
| 2003 | -0.11x | $-37.23K | $348.31K | ▲ +97.7% |
| 2002 | -4.63x | $-732.32K | $158.23K | ▼ -204.2% |
| 2001 | -1.52x | $-282.02K | $185.35K | ▲ +38.0% |
| 2000 | -2.46x | $-357.83K | $145.72K | — |