Lesaka Technologies Inc (LSAK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Lesaka Technologies Inc (LSAK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.03x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-10.92 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($427.99 Million) in one year. See how much free cash does Lesaka Technologies Inc generate to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Lesaka Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2000–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Lesaka Technologies Inc across 26 annual periods. Also explore how fast is Lesaka Technologies Inc growing its equity to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Lesaka Technologies Inc (2000–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lesaka Technologies Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see LSAK stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.02x | $-9.12 Million | $392.33 Million | ▼ -124.5% |
| 2024 | 0.09x | $28.79 Million | $303.16 Million | ▲ +6462.3% |
| 2023 | 0.00x | $410.00K | $283.33 Million | ▲ +101.3% |
| 2022 | -0.11x | $-37.20 Million | $342.22 Million | ▲ +87.5% |
| 2021 | -0.87x | $-58.37 Million | $67.37 Million | ▼ -47.7% |
| 2020 | -0.59x | $-46.05 Million | $78.49 Million | ▼ -3133.7% |
| 2019 | -0.02x | $-4.46 Million | $245.84 Million | ▼ -105.1% |
| 2018 | 0.36x | $132.60 Million | $373.19 Million | ▲ +171.6% |
| 2017 | 0.13x | $97.16 Million | $742.75 Million | ▼ -25.9% |
| 2016 | 0.18x | $116.55 Million | $660.28 Million | ▲ +5.4% |
| 2015 | 0.17x | $135.26 Million | $807.64 Million | ▲ +309.9% |
| 2014 | 0.04x | $37.15 Million | $909.20 Million | ▼ -31.6% |
| 2013 | 0.06x | $55.92 Million | $936.35 Million | ▲ +78.8% |
| 2012 | 0.03x | $20.41 Million | $611.07 Million | ▼ -77.0% |
| 2011 | 0.15x | $66.22 Million | $455.62 Million | ▼ -60.9% |
| 2010 | 0.37x | $68.68 Million | $184.79 Million | ▼ -56.9% |
| 2009 | 0.86x | $106.77 Million | $123.73 Million | ▼ -17.4% |
| 2008 | 1.04x | $118.76 Million | $113.74 Million | ▲ +51.5% |
| 2007 | 0.69x | $65.47 Million | $95.02 Million | ▼ -44.6% |
| 2006 | 1.24x | $75.78 Million | $60.97 Million | ▲ +45.8% |
| 2005 | 0.85x | $38.14 Million | $44.75 Million | ▲ +16.0% |
| 2004 | 0.73x | $41.90 Million | $57.04 Million | ▲ +787.0% |
| 2003 | -0.11x | $-37.23K | $348.31K | ▲ +97.7% |
| 2002 | -4.63x | $-732.32K | $158.23K | ▼ -204.2% |
| 2001 | -1.52x | $-282.02K | $185.35K | ▲ +38.0% |
| 2000 | -2.46x | $-357.83K | $145.72K | — |