Lesaka Technologies Inc (LSAK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Lesaka Technologies Inc (LSAK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $39.10 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($403.65 Million) in one year. Explore Lesaka Technologies Inc (LSAK) long-term investment share to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Lesaka Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2000–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Lesaka Technologies Inc across 26 annual periods. Also explore how large is Lesaka Technologies Inc's balance sheet for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Lesaka Technologies Inc (2000–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lesaka Technologies Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Lesaka Technologies Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.02x | $-9.12 Million | $392.33 Million | ▼ -124.5% |
| 2024 | 0.09x | $28.79 Million | $303.16 Million | ▲ +6462.3% |
| 2023 | 0.00x | $410.00K | $283.33 Million | ▲ +101.3% |
| 2022 | -0.11x | $-37.20 Million | $342.22 Million | ▲ +87.5% |
| 2021 | -0.87x | $-58.37 Million | $67.37 Million | ▼ -47.7% |
| 2020 | -0.59x | $-46.05 Million | $78.49 Million | ▼ -3133.7% |
| 2019 | -0.02x | $-4.46 Million | $245.84 Million | ▼ -105.1% |
| 2018 | 0.36x | $132.60 Million | $373.19 Million | ▲ +171.6% |
| 2017 | 0.13x | $97.16 Million | $742.75 Million | ▼ -25.9% |
| 2016 | 0.18x | $116.55 Million | $660.28 Million | ▲ +5.4% |
| 2015 | 0.17x | $135.26 Million | $807.64 Million | ▲ +309.9% |
| 2014 | 0.04x | $37.15 Million | $909.20 Million | ▼ -31.6% |
| 2013 | 0.06x | $55.92 Million | $936.35 Million | ▲ +78.8% |
| 2012 | 0.03x | $20.41 Million | $611.07 Million | ▼ -77.0% |
| 2011 | 0.15x | $66.22 Million | $455.62 Million | ▼ -60.9% |
| 2010 | 0.37x | $68.68 Million | $184.79 Million | ▼ -56.9% |
| 2009 | 0.86x | $106.77 Million | $123.73 Million | ▼ -17.4% |
| 2008 | 1.04x | $118.76 Million | $113.74 Million | ▲ +51.5% |
| 2007 | 0.69x | $65.47 Million | $95.02 Million | ▼ -44.6% |
| 2006 | 1.24x | $75.78 Million | $60.97 Million | ▲ +45.8% |
| 2005 | 0.85x | $38.14 Million | $44.75 Million | ▲ +16.0% |
| 2004 | 0.73x | $41.90 Million | $57.04 Million | ▲ +787.0% |
| 2003 | -0.11x | $-37.23K | $348.31K | ▲ +97.7% |
| 2002 | -4.63x | $-732.32K | $158.23K | ▼ -204.2% |
| 2001 | -1.52x | $-282.02K | $185.35K | ▲ +38.0% |
| 2000 | -2.46x | $-357.83K | $145.72K | — |