Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.32x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $50.26 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($158.82 Million) in one year. See LSCC FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Lattice Semiconductor Corporation across 37 annual periods. Also explore Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lattice Semiconductor Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see LSCC stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.04x | $175.11 Million | $169.07 Million | ▼ -2.2% |
| 2024 | 1.06x | $140.88 Million | $132.97 Million | ▼ -41.5% |
| 2023 | 1.81x | $269.59 Million | $148.87 Million | ▲ +136.2% |
| 2022 | 0.77x | $238.81 Million | $311.55 Million | ▲ +43.9% |
| 2021 | 0.53x | $167.72 Million | $314.86 Million | ▲ +71.8% |
| 2020 | 0.31x | $91.69 Million | $295.64 Million | ▼ -29.0% |
| 2019 | 0.44x | $124.14 Million | $284.36 Million | ▲ +209.8% |
| 2018 | 0.14x | $51.46 Million | $365.23 Million | ▲ +53.0% |
| 2017 | 0.09x | $38.51 Million | $418.27 Million | ▲ +9.5% |
| 2016 | 0.08x | $41.73 Million | $496.45 Million | ▲ +276.5% |
| 2015 | -0.05x | $-22.89 Million | $480.40 Million | ▼ -108.3% |
| 2014 | 0.58x | $40.12 Million | $69.56 Million | ▼ -36.5% |
| 2013 | 0.91x | $56.50 Million | $62.20 Million | ▲ +1339.2% |
| 2012 | 0.06x | $4.50 Million | $71.21 Million | ▼ -92.5% |
| 2011 | 0.84x | $62.18 Million | $74.36 Million | ▼ -37.8% |
| 2010 | 1.35x | $79.31 Million | $58.97 Million | ▼ -41.3% |
| 2009 | 2.29x | $98.94 Million | $43.20 Million | ▲ +223.1% |
| 2008 | 0.71x | $26.23 Million | $37.00 Million | ▲ +324.0% |
| 2007 | -0.32x | $-28.50 Million | $90.05 Million | ▼ -367.5% |
| 2006 | -0.07x | $-14.49 Million | $214.16 Million | ▲ +26.2% |
| 2005 | -0.09x | $-19.98 Million | $217.77 Million | ▼ -513.1% |
| 2004 | 0.02x | $5.96 Million | $268.31 Million | ▼ -84.3% |
| 2003 | 0.14x | $34.78 Million | $245.52 Million | ▼ -13.7% |
| 2002 | 0.16x | $46.00 Million | $280.13 Million | ▲ +716.0% |
| 2001 | 0.02x | $6.97 Million | $346.21 Million | ▼ -90.6% |
| 2000 | 0.21x | $94.30 Million | $440.23 Million | ▲ +45.7% |
| 1999 | 0.15x | $63.70 Million | $433.38 Million | ▼ -86.8% |
| 1998 | 1.11x | $63.70 Million | $57.20 Million | ▲ +52.6% |
| 1997 | 0.73x | $39.70 Million | $54.40 Million | ▲ +443.8% |
| 1996 | 0.13x | $7.30 Million | $54.40 Million | ▼ -85.5% |
| 1995 | 0.92x | $39.70 Million | $43.00 Million | ▲ +1046.9% |
| 1994 | -0.10x | $-4.30 Million | $44.10 Million | ▼ -121.5% |
| 1993 | 0.45x | $15.90 Million | $35.10 Million | ▼ -60.7% |
| 1992 | 1.15x | $24.20 Million | $21.00 Million | ▲ +159.5% |
| 1991 | 0.44x | $13.50 Million | $30.40 Million | ▼ -53.0% |
| 1990 | 0.94x | $15.20 Million | $16.10 Million | ▲ +50.1% |
| 1989 | 0.63x | $10.00 Million | $15.90 Million | — |