Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.32x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $50.26 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($158.82 Million) in one year. Explore how much of Lattice Semiconductor Corporation's assets are long-term investments to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Lattice Semiconductor Corporation across 37 annual periods. Also explore Lattice Semiconductor Corporation total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lattice Semiconductor Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Lattice Semiconductor Corporation market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.04x | $175.11 Million | $169.07 Million | ▼ -2.2% |
| 2024 | 1.06x | $140.88 Million | $132.97 Million | ▼ -41.5% |
| 2023 | 1.81x | $269.59 Million | $148.87 Million | ▲ +136.2% |
| 2022 | 0.77x | $238.81 Million | $311.55 Million | ▲ +43.9% |
| 2021 | 0.53x | $167.72 Million | $314.86 Million | ▲ +71.8% |
| 2020 | 0.31x | $91.69 Million | $295.64 Million | ▼ -29.0% |
| 2019 | 0.44x | $124.14 Million | $284.36 Million | ▲ +209.8% |
| 2018 | 0.14x | $51.46 Million | $365.23 Million | ▲ +53.0% |
| 2017 | 0.09x | $38.51 Million | $418.27 Million | ▲ +9.5% |
| 2016 | 0.08x | $41.73 Million | $496.45 Million | ▲ +276.5% |
| 2015 | -0.05x | $-22.89 Million | $480.40 Million | ▼ -108.3% |
| 2014 | 0.58x | $40.12 Million | $69.56 Million | ▼ -36.5% |
| 2013 | 0.91x | $56.50 Million | $62.20 Million | ▲ +1339.2% |
| 2012 | 0.06x | $4.50 Million | $71.21 Million | ▼ -92.5% |
| 2011 | 0.84x | $62.18 Million | $74.36 Million | ▼ -37.8% |
| 2010 | 1.35x | $79.31 Million | $58.97 Million | ▼ -41.3% |
| 2009 | 2.29x | $98.94 Million | $43.20 Million | ▲ +223.1% |
| 2008 | 0.71x | $26.23 Million | $37.00 Million | ▲ +324.0% |
| 2007 | -0.32x | $-28.50 Million | $90.05 Million | ▼ -367.5% |
| 2006 | -0.07x | $-14.49 Million | $214.16 Million | ▲ +26.2% |
| 2005 | -0.09x | $-19.98 Million | $217.77 Million | ▼ -513.1% |
| 2004 | 0.02x | $5.96 Million | $268.31 Million | ▼ -84.3% |
| 2003 | 0.14x | $34.78 Million | $245.52 Million | ▼ -13.7% |
| 2002 | 0.16x | $46.00 Million | $280.13 Million | ▲ +716.0% |
| 2001 | 0.02x | $6.97 Million | $346.21 Million | ▼ -90.6% |
| 2000 | 0.21x | $94.30 Million | $440.23 Million | ▲ +45.7% |
| 1999 | 0.15x | $63.70 Million | $433.38 Million | ▼ -86.8% |
| 1998 | 1.11x | $63.70 Million | $57.20 Million | ▲ +52.6% |
| 1997 | 0.73x | $39.70 Million | $54.40 Million | ▲ +443.8% |
| 1996 | 0.13x | $7.30 Million | $54.40 Million | ▼ -85.5% |
| 1995 | 0.92x | $39.70 Million | $43.00 Million | ▲ +1046.9% |
| 1994 | -0.10x | $-4.30 Million | $44.10 Million | ▼ -121.5% |
| 1993 | 0.45x | $15.90 Million | $35.10 Million | ▼ -60.7% |
| 1992 | 1.15x | $24.20 Million | $21.00 Million | ▲ +159.5% |
| 1991 | 0.44x | $13.50 Million | $30.40 Million | ▼ -53.0% |
| 1990 | 0.94x | $15.20 Million | $16.10 Million | ▲ +50.1% |
| 1989 | 0.63x | $10.00 Million | $15.90 Million | — |