Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.47x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $88.30 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($188.65 Million) in one year. See financial agility of Lattice Semiconductor Corporation to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Lattice Semiconductor Corporation across 37 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Lattice Semiconductor Corporation cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lattice Semiconductor Corporation. Check LSCC cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.04x | $175.11 Million | $169.07 Million | ▼ -2.2% |
| 2024 | 1.06x | $140.88 Million | $132.97 Million | ▼ -41.5% |
| 2023 | 1.81x | $269.59 Million | $148.87 Million | ▲ +136.2% |
| 2022 | 0.77x | $238.81 Million | $311.55 Million | ▲ +43.9% |
| 2021 | 0.53x | $167.72 Million | $314.86 Million | ▲ +71.8% |
| 2020 | 0.31x | $91.69 Million | $295.64 Million | ▼ -29.0% |
| 2019 | 0.44x | $124.14 Million | $284.36 Million | ▲ +209.8% |
| 2018 | 0.14x | $51.46 Million | $365.23 Million | ▲ +53.0% |
| 2017 | 0.09x | $38.51 Million | $418.27 Million | ▲ +9.5% |
| 2016 | 0.08x | $41.73 Million | $496.45 Million | ▲ +276.5% |
| 2015 | -0.05x | $-22.89 Million | $480.40 Million | ▼ -108.3% |
| 2014 | 0.58x | $40.12 Million | $69.56 Million | ▼ -36.5% |
| 2013 | 0.91x | $56.50 Million | $62.20 Million | ▲ +1339.2% |
| 2012 | 0.06x | $4.50 Million | $71.21 Million | ▼ -92.5% |
| 2011 | 0.84x | $62.18 Million | $74.36 Million | ▼ -37.8% |
| 2010 | 1.35x | $79.31 Million | $58.97 Million | ▼ -41.3% |
| 2009 | 2.29x | $98.94 Million | $43.20 Million | ▲ +223.1% |
| 2008 | 0.71x | $26.23 Million | $37.00 Million | ▲ +324.0% |
| 2007 | -0.32x | $-28.50 Million | $90.05 Million | ▼ -367.5% |
| 2006 | -0.07x | $-14.49 Million | $214.16 Million | ▲ +26.2% |
| 2005 | -0.09x | $-19.98 Million | $217.77 Million | ▼ -513.1% |
| 2004 | 0.02x | $5.96 Million | $268.31 Million | ▼ -84.3% |
| 2003 | 0.14x | $34.78 Million | $245.52 Million | ▼ -13.7% |
| 2002 | 0.16x | $46.00 Million | $280.13 Million | ▲ +716.0% |
| 2001 | 0.02x | $6.97 Million | $346.21 Million | ▼ -90.6% |
| 2000 | 0.21x | $94.30 Million | $440.23 Million | ▲ +45.7% |
| 1999 | 0.15x | $63.70 Million | $433.38 Million | ▼ -86.8% |
| 1998 | 1.11x | $63.70 Million | $57.20 Million | ▲ +52.6% |
| 1997 | 0.73x | $39.70 Million | $54.40 Million | ▲ +443.8% |
| 1996 | 0.13x | $7.30 Million | $54.40 Million | ▼ -85.5% |
| 1995 | 0.92x | $39.70 Million | $43.00 Million | ▲ +1046.9% |
| 1994 | -0.10x | $-4.30 Million | $44.10 Million | ▼ -121.5% |
| 1993 | 0.45x | $15.90 Million | $35.10 Million | ▼ -60.7% |
| 1992 | 1.15x | $24.20 Million | $21.00 Million | ▲ +159.5% |
| 1991 | 0.44x | $13.50 Million | $30.40 Million | ▼ -53.0% |
| 1990 | 0.94x | $15.20 Million | $16.10 Million | ▲ +50.1% |
| 1989 | 0.63x | $10.00 Million | $15.90 Million | — |