Lattice Semiconductor Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.47x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $88.30 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($188.65 Million) in one year. Check Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (1989–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Lattice Semiconductor Corporation from 1989 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Lattice Semiconductor Corporation across 37 annual periods. Check LSCC cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1989–2025)
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1989 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lattice Semiconductor Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) cash conversion ratio.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.04x | $175.11 Million | $169.07 Million | ▼ -2.2% |
| 2024 | 1.06x | $140.88 Million | $132.97 Million | ▼ -41.5% |
| 2023 | 1.81x | $269.59 Million | $148.87 Million | ▲ +136.2% |
| 2022 | 0.77x | $238.81 Million | $311.55 Million | ▲ +43.9% |
| 2021 | 0.53x | $167.72 Million | $314.86 Million | ▲ +71.8% |
| 2020 | 0.31x | $91.69 Million | $295.64 Million | ▼ -29.0% |
| 2019 | 0.44x | $124.14 Million | $284.36 Million | ▲ +209.8% |
| 2018 | 0.14x | $51.46 Million | $365.23 Million | ▲ +53.0% |
| 2017 | 0.09x | $38.51 Million | $418.27 Million | ▲ +9.5% |
| 2016 | 0.08x | $41.73 Million | $496.45 Million | ▲ +276.5% |
| 2015 | -0.05x | $-22.89 Million | $480.40 Million | ▼ -108.3% |
| 2014 | 0.58x | $40.12 Million | $69.56 Million | ▼ -36.5% |
| 2013 | 0.91x | $56.50 Million | $62.20 Million | ▲ +1339.2% |
| 2012 | 0.06x | $4.50 Million | $71.21 Million | ▼ -92.5% |
| 2011 | 0.84x | $62.18 Million | $74.36 Million | ▼ -37.8% |
| 2010 | 1.35x | $79.31 Million | $58.97 Million | ▼ -41.3% |
| 2009 | 2.29x | $98.94 Million | $43.20 Million | ▲ +223.1% |
| 2008 | 0.71x | $26.23 Million | $37.00 Million | ▲ +324.0% |
| 2007 | -0.32x | $-28.50 Million | $90.05 Million | ▼ -367.5% |
| 2006 | -0.07x | $-14.49 Million | $214.16 Million | ▲ +26.2% |
| 2005 | -0.09x | $-19.98 Million | $217.77 Million | ▼ -513.1% |
| 2004 | 0.02x | $5.96 Million | $268.31 Million | ▼ -84.3% |
| 2003 | 0.14x | $34.78 Million | $245.52 Million | ▼ -13.7% |
| 2002 | 0.16x | $46.00 Million | $280.13 Million | ▲ +716.0% |
| 2001 | 0.02x | $6.97 Million | $346.21 Million | ▼ -90.6% |
| 2000 | 0.21x | $94.30 Million | $440.23 Million | ▲ +45.7% |
| 1999 | 0.15x | $63.70 Million | $433.38 Million | ▼ -86.8% |
| 1998 | 1.11x | $63.70 Million | $57.20 Million | ▲ +52.6% |
| 1997 | 0.73x | $39.70 Million | $54.40 Million | ▲ +443.8% |
| 1996 | 0.13x | $7.30 Million | $54.40 Million | ▼ -85.5% |
| 1995 | 0.92x | $39.70 Million | $43.00 Million | ▲ +1046.9% |
| 1994 | -0.10x | $-4.30 Million | $44.10 Million | ▼ -121.5% |
| 1993 | 0.45x | $15.90 Million | $35.10 Million | ▼ -60.7% |
| 1992 | 1.15x | $24.20 Million | $21.00 Million | ▲ +159.5% |
| 1991 | 0.44x | $13.50 Million | $30.40 Million | ▼ -53.0% |
| 1990 | 0.94x | $15.20 Million | $16.10 Million | ▲ +50.1% |
| 1989 | 0.63x | $10.00 Million | $15.90 Million | — |