Landstar System Inc (LSTR) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Landstar System Inc (LSTR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $78.21 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($803.22 Million) in one year. Explore LSTR long-term investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Landstar System Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Landstar System Inc across 33 annual periods. Also explore Landstar System Inc asset portfolio for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Landstar System Inc (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Landstar System Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Landstar System Inc (LSTR) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.27x | $224.88 Million | $840.27 Million | ▼ -21.5% |
| 2024 | 0.34x | $286.56 Million | $840.87 Million | ▼ -29.2% |
| 2023 | 0.48x | $393.65 Million | $817.92 Million | ▼ -19.3% |
| 2022 | 0.60x | $622.66 Million | $1.04 Billion | ▲ +154.9% |
| 2021 | 0.23x | $276.74 Million | $1.18 Billion | ▲ +6.8% |
| 2020 | 0.22x | $210.72 Million | $961.96 Million | ▼ -49.7% |
| 2019 | 0.44x | $307.84 Million | $706.24 Million | ▲ +1.2% |
| 2018 | 0.43x | $297.90 Million | $691.43 Million | ▲ +116.6% |
| 2017 | 0.20x | $138.96 Million | $698.58 Million | ▼ -42.1% |
| 2016 | 0.34x | $190.24 Million | $554.03 Million | ▼ -15.5% |
| 2015 | 0.41x | $216.02 Million | $531.83 Million | ▲ +121.7% |
| 2014 | 0.18x | $101.87 Million | $555.95 Million | ▼ -41.6% |
| 2013 | 0.31x | $162.01 Million | $516.22 Million | ▲ +24.9% |
| 2012 | 0.25x | $125.58 Million | $499.97 Million | ▲ +8.1% |
| 2011 | 0.23x | $118.03 Million | $507.87 Million | ▼ -7.5% |
| 2010 | 0.25x | $108.76 Million | $432.92 Million | ▼ -34.0% |
| 2009 | 0.38x | $144.96 Million | $380.64 Million | ▲ +30.6% |
| 2008 | 0.29x | $119.69 Million | $410.39 Million | ▼ -7.0% |
| 2007 | 0.31x | $140.61 Million | $448.21 Million | ▼ -55.3% |
| 2006 | 0.70x | $292.17 Million | $416.38 Million | ▲ +5382.5% |
| 2005 | 0.01x | $6.53 Million | $510.12 Million | ▼ -90.4% |
| 2004 | 0.13x | $49.74 Million | $371.67 Million | ▼ -25.8% |
| 2003 | 0.18x | $53.40 Million | $295.94 Million | ▼ -46.1% |
| 2002 | 0.34x | $84.31 Million | $251.66 Million | ▲ +66.3% |
| 2001 | 0.20x | $49.79 Million | $247.21 Million | ▼ -2.2% |
| 2000 | 0.21x | $54.05 Million | $262.50 Million | ▲ +22.7% |
| 1999 | 0.17x | $43.39 Million | $258.56 Million | ▼ -36.5% |
| 1998 | 0.26x | $53.36 Million | $201.82 Million | ▼ -22.9% |
| 1997 | 0.34x | $70.43 Million | $205.48 Million | ▲ +206.1% |
| 1996 | 0.11x | $24.99 Million | $223.24 Million | ▲ +25.8% |
| 1995 | 0.09x | $20.00 Million | $224.70 Million | ▼ -60.4% |
| 1994 | 0.22x | $36.40 Million | $161.90 Million | ▲ +93.5% |
| 1993 | 0.12x | $16.10 Million | $138.60 Million | — |