LSI Industries Inc (LYTS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
LSI Industries Inc (LYTS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.17x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $24.98 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($148.21 Million) in one year. Check LYTS total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
LSI Industries Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for LSI Industries Inc across 34 annual periods. Also explore LSI Industries Inc asset portfolio for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for LSI Industries Inc (1992–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for LSI Industries Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see LYTS stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.23x | $38.12 Million | $165.64 Million | ▼ -23.4% |
| 2024 | 0.30x | $43.39 Million | $144.44 Million | ▼ -28.2% |
| 2023 | 0.42x | $49.59 Million | $118.57 Million | ▲ +1868.0% |
| 2022 | -0.02x | $-3.86 Million | $163.31 Million | ▼ -113.1% |
| 2021 | 0.18x | $28.01 Million | $155.65 Million | ▼ -71.8% |
| 2020 | 0.64x | $29.71 Million | $46.56 Million | ▲ +350.7% |
| 2019 | 0.14x | $11.49 Million | $81.16 Million | ▲ +11.1% |
| 2018 | 0.13x | $11.50 Million | $90.27 Million | ▼ -41.5% |
| 2017 | 0.22x | $21.03 Million | $96.60 Million | ▼ -51.0% |
| 2016 | 0.44x | $17.79 Million | $40.04 Million | ▼ -16.3% |
| 2015 | 0.53x | $20.93 Million | $39.43 Million | ▲ +44.6% |
| 2014 | 0.37x | $11.56 Million | $31.48 Million | ▲ +14.1% |
| 2013 | 0.32x | $8.85 Million | $27.49 Million | ▼ -65.8% |
| 2012 | 0.94x | $24.36 Million | $25.86 Million | ▲ +713.9% |
| 2011 | -0.15x | $-3.81 Million | $24.80 Million | ▼ -127.2% |
| 2010 | 0.56x | $16.73 Million | $29.63 Million | ▼ -22.4% |
| 2009 | 0.73x | $16.49 Million | $22.64 Million | ▲ +101.4% |
| 2008 | 0.36x | $12.66 Million | $35.02 Million | ▼ -43.7% |
| 2007 | 0.64x | $36.96 Million | $57.55 Million | ▲ +76.5% |
| 2006 | 0.36x | $21.63 Million | $59.42 Million | ▼ -54.2% |
| 2005 | 0.79x | $27.48 Million | $34.60 Million | ▲ +200.8% |
| 2004 | 0.26x | $12.11 Million | $45.87 Million | ▼ -24.3% |
| 2003 | 0.35x | $13.22 Million | $37.87 Million | ▼ -35.3% |
| 2002 | 0.54x | $27.25 Million | $50.49 Million | ▲ +1170.3% |
| 2001 | -0.05x | $-2.75 Million | $54.57 Million | ▼ -107.3% |
| 2000 | 0.69x | $19.80 Million | $28.57 Million | ▲ +10.4% |
| 1999 | 0.63x | $21.90 Million | $34.90 Million | ▲ +38.7% |
| 1998 | 0.45x | $14.30 Million | $31.60 Million | ▲ +7.0% |
| 1997 | 0.42x | $11.50 Million | $27.20 Million | ▲ +2521.3% |
| 1996 | 0.02x | $400.00K | $24.80 Million | ▼ -70.3% |
| 1995 | 0.05x | $1.80 Million | $33.10 Million | ▼ -84.0% |
| 1994 | 0.34x | $7.60 Million | $22.30 Million | ▲ +36.3% |
| 1993 | 0.25x | $4.60 Million | $18.40 Million | ▲ +187.5% |
| 1992 | 0.09x | $2.00 Million | $23.00 Million | — |